Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:17 AM Dec 2012

Thoughts on Heroes ...

I was watching Morning Joe, while getting ready for work, and heard the term "hero" mentioned; I think the term was appropriately used.

They were running a segment on the reporter, Richard Engel; he was taken captive and rescued. One of the MJ crew referred to Engel as a Hero ... Why? How is reporting the news particularly heroic? He is certainly doing a dangerous job; but heroic? Now the rescuers may have acted heroicly; but Engel ... I don't know.

This got mme thinking about how the word is currently being used. If one is a 1st responder or are in the military, one is automatically deemed a hero ... regardless of what that person actually does in that uniform. What about the fireman that never went into the burning building; or the police officer that never confronted the bad guy; or the soldier that spent her entire military career in the JAG Corp. Are they heroes ... Have they done anything particularly heroic?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thoughts on Heroes ...