Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:43 PM Dec 2012

Does the second ammendment protect the sale of ammunition

Centerfire pistol ammunition should be limited to the military, law enforcement officers and guard services with permits.

Centerfire rifle ammunition should be difficult to get and required to be stored under safe conditions. (IIRC, the Swiss received their ammunition for home storage in sealed tins, which had to be accounted for periodically.)

Only .22 short rimfire and birdshot should be fairly readily available.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does the second ammendment protect the sale of ammunition (Original Post) FarCenter Dec 2012 OP
Apparently you don't know that most of what you call rifle ammunition is also used in handguns. nt jody Dec 2012 #1
Number 5 up are centerfire rifle ammunition FarCenter Dec 2012 #6
All of those are used in handguns NickB79 Dec 2012 #8
These are really fairly rare FarCenter Dec 2012 #13
The law would have to be tightened NickB79 Dec 2012 #16
I don't know what the rounds are in the first picture. You can check out available pistol rounds at jody Dec 2012 #9
I wouldn't be too concerned about single shot, break action pistols as mass murder weapons. FarCenter Dec 2012 #15
You said "Centerfire pistol ammunition should be limited" and I pointed out most rifle calibers are jody Dec 2012 #18
I think that you could draw a distinction between the two by diameter, energy and momentum FarCenter Dec 2012 #22
IT's pretty easy to make your own rounds Taverner Dec 2012 #2
Its pretty easy to make meth too DJ13 Dec 2012 #3
Hmmm...interesting...keep going... Taverner Dec 2012 #4
Handloaders have to have a source of gunpowder FarCenter Dec 2012 #7
The most difficult component is sarisataka Dec 2012 #12
Criminal will always buy guns from law enforcement and the military FarCenter Dec 2012 #17
Yes, the black market would be rife sarisataka Dec 2012 #23
The Second Amendment is a broken theory from another age. onehandle Dec 2012 #5
muskets and homemade ammo bluemarkers Dec 2012 #10
It would probably be ruled a "use tax" by the Supreme Court NickB79 Dec 2012 #11
Nuisance tax then maybe byeya Dec 2012 #14
Not USSC, but in Herrington v. United States (2010) the court said: petronius Dec 2012 #19
It wouldn't be a ban on possession. It would be a ban on manufacture and sale. FarCenter Dec 2012 #21
Same reasoning though - Herrington implies that ammunition is protected to the same petronius Dec 2012 #24
all i have is birdshot and .22 long rifle arely staircase Dec 2012 #20
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
1. Apparently you don't know that most of what you call rifle ammunition is also used in handguns. nt
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:45 PM
Dec 2012
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
6. Number 5 up are centerfire rifle ammunition
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:56 PM
Dec 2012

Which of these are used in hanguns?




Below are centerfire handgun cartridges.



Some of these, such as the .44 magnum, are used in rifles, and others, such as the 9 mm are used in submachine guns. But I don't think that any of these should be available to civilians without a permit.

The .22 short rimfire is similar to the cartridge on the right, but it is about 2/3 the length.

NickB79

(19,271 posts)
8. All of those are used in handguns
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:00 PM
Dec 2012

Hell, they make a revolver that fires fucking .45-70 Government rounds! That's the same round used to kill off buffalo on the Great Plains at 500 yards!

http://www.magnumresearch.com/Firearms/Magnum-Research-4570-Revolver-75-inch-Barrel.asp

In the world of guns, there's nothing too crazy for someone to try to do.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
13. These are really fairly rare
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:09 PM
Dec 2012

And chamber pressures and recoil are going to make any semi-automatic pistol quite large and heavy.

If it's a problem the law could be tightened to restrict centerfire rifle ammunition as well. Especially centerfire rifle ammunition less than .270 caliber.

NickB79

(19,271 posts)
16. The law would have to be tightened
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:16 PM
Dec 2012

I can buy one of these at the local Fleet Farm Supply store down the road, as well as every dedicated gun shop I've been in in the past 5 years:

http://www.rockriverarms.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=category.display&category_id=231

And then there are these:

http://www.americanrifleman.org/GalleryItem.aspx?cid=22&gid=159&id=1399

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
9. I don't know what the rounds are in the first picture. You can check out available pistol rounds at
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:02 PM
Dec 2012

the following link for the G2 Contender Pistols, http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/g2Contender.php

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
15. I wouldn't be too concerned about single shot, break action pistols as mass murder weapons.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:13 PM
Dec 2012

From left to right: 1 .17 HM2, 2 .17 HMR, 3 .22LR, 4 .22 WMR, 5 .17/23 SMc, 6 5mm/35 SMc, 7 .22 Hornet, 8 .223 Remington, 9 .223 WSSM, 10 .243 Winchester, 11 .243 Winchester Improved (Ackley), 12 .25-06 Remington, 13 .270 Winchester, 14 .308, 15 .30-06, 16 .45-70, 17 .50-90 Sharps

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
18. You said "Centerfire pistol ammunition should be limited" and I pointed out most rifle calibers are
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:17 PM
Dec 2012

or could easily be used in a handgun. That would effectively ban those rounds of rifle ammunition.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
22. I think that you could draw a distinction between the two by diameter, energy and momentum
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:40 PM
Dec 2012

Energy and momentum would tend to be associated with chamber pressures and recoil. High recoil hunting cartridges, such as .30-06 aren't very usable in pistols.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
3. Its pretty easy to make meth too
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:50 PM
Dec 2012

But its been shown that control of the components necessary to make it decreases the supply.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
4. Hmmm...interesting...keep going...
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:53 PM
Dec 2012

The shells can be reused, but perhaps the lead?

Although you can use any material for your bullet - it could be frozen meat (at least on CSI)

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
7. Handloaders have to have a source of gunpowder
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:58 PM
Dec 2012

While blackpowder is fairly easy to make, cooking up smokeless powder in your garage is more of a challenge.

You could probably buy shot shells and extract powder to reload handgun cartridges, but it might be somewhat challenging to get it to cycle reliably in an automatic.

Centerfire brass is only good for so many uses.

Centerfire primers are also another material to control.

sarisataka

(18,774 posts)
12. The most difficult component is
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:05 PM
Dec 2012

the primer. Old fashioned black powder could be used in place of smokeless but the components of primers are much more volatile and difficult to make.

Unfortunately they are the smallest and would be the easiest to smuggle. OTH your average criminal would not likely go through the trouble to craft ammo.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
17. Criminal will always buy guns from law enforcement and the military
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:16 PM
Dec 2012

There are lots of countries around the world the limit guns and ammuntion to police and army.

It never stops criminals from getting them.

sarisataka

(18,774 posts)
23. Yes, the black market would be rife
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:45 PM
Dec 2012

And why smuggle components when assembled ammo would be as easy...

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. The Second Amendment is a broken theory from another age.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:55 PM
Dec 2012

The founders had no idea. It should be repealed. Period.

bluemarkers

(536 posts)
10. muskets and homemade ammo
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:02 PM
Dec 2012

so I guess we could outlaw the sale of ammo, as lead balls were homemade

If we go back to original intent... but surely the founding fathers though there should be a bazooka in every closet?

NickB79

(19,271 posts)
11. It would probably be ruled a "use tax" by the Supreme Court
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:05 PM
Dec 2012

And there is precedent against use taxes and constitutional rights: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneapolis_Star_Tribune_Company_v._Commissioner

Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 575 (1983), was an opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States overturning a use tax on paper and ink in excess of $100,000 consumed in any calendar year.

On its face, this ruling finds that state tax systems cannot treat the press differently than any other business without significant and substantial justification. The state of Minnesota demonstrated no such justification to impose a special tax on a select few newspaper publishers. Therefore, this tax was in violation of the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press.


petronius

(26,603 posts)
19. Not USSC, but in Herrington v. United States (2010) the court said:
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:24 PM
Dec 2012
In neither Heller nor McDonald did the Supreme Court directly address restrictions on the possession of ammunition per se. ( The District's requirement that lawfully-maintained firearms be kept unloaded was not challenged in Heller.) Nonetheless, from the Court's reasoning, it logically follows that the right to keep and bear arms extends to the possession of handgun ammunition in the home; ?for if such possession could be banned (and not simply regulated), that would make it “impossible for citizens to use for the core lawful purpose of self-defense.”?By the same token, given the obvious connection between handgun ammunition and the right protected by the Second Amendment, we are hard-pressed to see how a flat ban on the possession of such ammunition in the home could survive heightened scrutiny of any kind. We therefore conclude that the Second Amendment guarantees a right to possess ammunition in the home that is coextensive with the right to possess a usable handgun there.?The government has not taken issue with that conclusion.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/dc-court-of-appeals/1543809.html

So, it seems to me that any regulation or tax intended to limit the acquisition of ammunition would be just as Constitutional (or not) as if it applied to firearms themselves...
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
21. It wouldn't be a ban on possession. It would be a ban on manufacture and sale.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:35 PM
Dec 2012

Furthermore, controlling ammunition would have some effect in not too many years as the existing stock is used up.

Controlling guns is pretty impractical given how many there are in private hands already.

petronius

(26,603 posts)
24. Same reasoning though - Herrington implies that ammunition is protected to the same
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:49 PM
Dec 2012

degree that firearms themselves are. So if guns can't be banned, then neither can ammunition. To the extent that guns can be regulated, then so can ammunition.

More generally, I can't imagine that any court would go along with an 'end-around' attempt to eliminate or infringe on 2A or any other part of the BoR - whether through taxation, banning accessories like ammo, or other means...

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
20. all i have is birdshot and .22 long rifle
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 08:30 PM
Dec 2012

as well as a browning 9mm. all of these are in a safe with trigger locks. don't feel like i am doing anything that needs to be more regulatedor curtailed through a lack of ammunition.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the second ammendmen...