General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNow is not the time to talk about Gun Control
Last edited Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:48 PM - Edit history (1)
and and any such discussion should be regulated to the killing enablers' gun nut forum on DU.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)GObamaGO
(665 posts)I predict this will be locked or you will be told to take it to the gungeon.
jody
(26,624 posts)support for the Second Amendment?
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)n/t
jody
(26,624 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)n/t
jody
(26,624 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)You don't support the 2nd amendment?
jody
(26,624 posts)make Obama recant . . ."
What is your answer to that question?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)My question to you is this. Do you only care about winning debates and your right to bear arms or does the killing of innocent children give you pause to maybe consider the point that gun violence in this country is getting to the point of unacceptable levels.
jody
(26,624 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Your losing the effect you think your arguments have. People will be calling for gun control. Get use to it.
jody
(26,624 posts)advocate some degree of banning firearms.
.
I don't see you posting to those
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)tactics anymore.
jody
(26,624 posts)I'm opposed to the right to kill with bullshit arms.
jody
(26,624 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Wind Dancer
(3,618 posts)gcomeau
(5,764 posts)People pull this crap every single time.
Mass shooting ---> "Oh, don't talk about it NOW... a little respect!!!" ---> anyone brings it up later? Immediate and vociferous denial that there's any problem to be addressed and discussion shouted down.
arthritisR_US
(7,298 posts)Iggo
(47,568 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)like this one occur, more people get involved with that conversation. Sorry that bothers you.
We truly need to find a way to stop massacres like this from happening. You can't stop this conversation just because you don't like where it's taking place.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Now reread the entirety of my post.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Nor will it be. It will be discussed generally, and not just on this website. Right now, the discussion is primarily in GD, where you posted. You can join those discussions or not. That's your choice.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)because i thought it was obvious. Apparently not. Sorry about that.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Say what you think, directly and without playing word games. Anything else will be misunderstood right now. When there's a very serious thing going on, it's not time to mess around with word games. Truly.
You can still edit your original post, you know. You can still explain that you were being sarcastic and regret that.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)I think most people get what I meant. thanks anyway for your advice.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)or what you stand for. Many of them will misunderstand your OP, and naturally so.
You're not as famous as you believe on DU.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Famous for anything. I have 20 followers on twitter and most of them are spam followers.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Initech
(100,104 posts)YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)If not now, when?
tosh
(4,424 posts)JanMichael
(24,890 posts)while we do it.
MrYikes
(720 posts)but could someone at least say something just a little bit bad about the people who did this?