Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:35 AM Dec 2012

You are on a Jury: What Proves a Rape Occurred

All these rape threads made me think of one of the most basic problems with the crime, namely that it is hard to prove. There are certainly some exceptions, such as when the act is extremely violent, but in many cases it is simply his story versus hers. In such cases, what would you need to come to the conclusion that a rape happened and the defendant is guilty?

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
2. No bright lines
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:43 AM
Dec 2012

Any crime or court case would be different from the next. But would look for some general thoughts.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
3. Well, the black eye and the antibiotics convinced me.
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:46 AM
Dec 2012

But the jury decided she wasn't a virgin at 17 so it couldn't have been rape.

Someone else I knew had to get a new winter coat because after two men dragged her to a rooftop, it wasn't worth much anymore. I found that convincing.

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
5. Where was that, that a jury didn't fint that convincing?
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:52 AM
Dec 2012

If you don't mind me asking. Small town? big city? What was the race of the woman and the jury? Many factors in society play into such things. I was just wondering.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
4. o.o
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:46 AM
Dec 2012


I have a feeling nothing good will come of this thread, but damn is it probably not going to be a slugfest.
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
6. You might be stuck deciding which witness is credible.
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 02:59 AM
Dec 2012

But that's a lot of cases, right?
CSI can't always "prove" it like on TV.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
9. Sometimes it's a tough call, other times not
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:18 AM
Dec 2012

But people judge testimony all the time in all sorts of cases. It's not limited to rape cases.

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
10. True...But I'm this crime, rather the event is a crime or isn't is often in question.
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:25 AM
Dec 2012

But I'm this crime, rather the event is a crime or isn't is often in question.


A counter example is theft. Someone steals something. People will look at oppurity, motivation etc. However, the defense willl rarely be,it happened but wasn't a crime.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
11. Well there's more fraudulent reporting of theft, so I might wonder
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:34 AM
Dec 2012

If for some reason the person reporting the theft wasn't lying. Much less likely for murder or rape.

dsc

(52,165 posts)
8. the same thing you would use to evaluate any other testimony
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 03:17 AM
Dec 2012

Does the story make sense? Did the person lie in any part of the testimony? Has the story stayed consistent over time? Is there a motive for lying? What is the demeanor of the witness?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You are on a Jury: What P...