Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:40 AM Dec 2012

Is there a good reason why congress should not require companies to pay a livable wage?

Seriously - Walmart is highly profitable, in part because it keeps its workforce largely part-time in order to avoid paying for insurance. Many workers therequalify for food stamps and other assistance.

Should minimum wage be increased to a livable wage?

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
13. ok..
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:55 AM
Dec 2012

For 1 person that is $11,170 ( http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/12poverty.shtml ).

For 40 hours/week, 52 weeks per year that comes out to be $5.37 per hour which is actually
less than the current Federal minimum wage of $7.25/hour ( http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/wages/minimumwage.htm )

(For 30 hours/week, 52 weeks per year $11,170 would be $7.16/hour )

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
5. For the location. Feds adjust the per diem for location, no reason this could not also work that way
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:45 AM
Dec 2012

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. The argument, as far as it goes, is that not everybody has to live off of their wage
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:46 AM
Dec 2012

The high school kid guessing your weight at the carnival, etc. I'm not terribly convinced, but that's the most cogent argument I've seen.

And that doesn't even get in to the fact that farm workers don't have a minimum wage.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
10. We are subsidizing a lot of company profits by giving food stamps and medicaid to their underpaid
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:50 AM
Dec 2012

part time workers. part time workers who want to work full time, but are intenetionally kept part time in order to justify NOT giving them insurance.

What can be done to help the working poor?

 

Lightbulb_on

(315 posts)
8. What defines a "livable wage"...
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:46 AM
Dec 2012

Location as mentioned above...

Also does that include luxuries like TV, AC, vacations etc.. etc.. etc..?

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
11. That power is not granted to Congress by the Constitution, therefore it belongs to the states.
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:52 AM
Dec 2012

Tenth Amendment - Reserved Powers

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
14. There is a federal minimum wage law...
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:58 AM
Dec 2012

http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/wages/minimumwage.htm#.ULtq1HeJSno

"The federal minimum wage for covered nonexempt employees is $7.25 per hour effective July 24, 2009. The federal minimum wage provisions are contained in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Many states also have minimum wage laws. In cases where an employee is subject to both the state and federal minimum wage laws, the employee is entitled to the higher of the two minimum wages. "
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
15. Yes, under the "general welfare" clause. Article I, Section 8.
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 11:04 AM
Dec 2012

But the federal minimum wage is not a "living" wage, and trying to define what that would be poses serious problems because of difference in the cost of living from one place to another.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there a good reason wh...