Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:34 AM Nov 2012

I'm lazy: Can someone summarize Benghazi, Petraeus, Susan Rice and so on?

All I read was that Petraeus had an affair and how it is somehow connected to the CIA and FBI and blaming Obama for Benghazi or something. Is there a short summary of the story?

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm lazy: Can someone summarize Benghazi, Petraeus, Susan Rice and so on? (Original Post) redgreenandblue Nov 2012 OP
In short: Something(s) bad happened, finally, and Pubs are blaming the black guy. jpljr77 Nov 2012 #1
Yeah, but somehow it had to do with Petraeus banging someone and emails. redgreenandblue Nov 2012 #2
Right. That angle is confusing and stupid, and as such, I think has largely been dropped. jpljr77 Nov 2012 #3
Basically Old Codger Nov 2012 #4
4 Americans died in Benghazi on Sept 11 Enrique Nov 2012 #5
So some people speculated he really resigned over Benghazi? redgreenandblue Nov 2012 #6
one of the theories was that Obama forced him out Enrique Nov 2012 #13
Ok, it's starting to make sense (or rather no sense...) redgreenandblue Nov 2012 #14
A lady in a restaurant the other day overheard us talking about this and stopped at our Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2012 #7
I wish at that point you had been "Laura ThrowYourDrink" (on the crazy) - n/t coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #9
LOL! pinboy3niner Nov 2012 #12
Try this Proud Public Servant Nov 2012 #8
Beautiful . . . EXCEPT (wait for it) . . . all those planets coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #10
A little, bit. But I think here on DU it was suggested ... redgreenandblue Nov 2012 #11
Yeah, our side has a couple of nutso theories too Proud Public Servant Nov 2012 #15
it is because the offical story is inadequate Enrique Nov 2012 #17
That's certainly true Proud Public Servant Nov 2012 #19
Certain members of the republican party (senate) have gone around the bend. shraby Nov 2012 #16
Spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam ... bemildred Nov 2012 #18
I'm lazy, too, so no. MineralMan Nov 2012 #20

jpljr77

(1,004 posts)
1. In short: Something(s) bad happened, finally, and Pubs are blaming the black guy.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:37 AM
Nov 2012

Things had been going too well, so they put all effort into pinning this on Obama.

jpljr77

(1,004 posts)
3. Right. That angle is confusing and stupid, and as such, I think has largely been dropped.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:43 AM
Nov 2012

Of course now, it's not so much the black guy's fault as the black lady. "GRRRR, we hate her so much with her power and position," said every Republican ever.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
5. 4 Americans died in Benghazi on Sept 11
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:16 AM
Nov 2012

there were flaws in the information the government provided to the public about the attack, in particular some appearances Susan Rice made on TV the weekend after the attack.

Petraeus resigned after the election, saying it was about an affair. The CIA is connected because he was CIA director and Benghazi was a CIA facility.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
13. one of the theories was that Obama forced him out
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:40 AM
Nov 2012

to prevent him from testifying about Benghazi. That theory became less popular when Petraeus testified about Benghazi.

There are theories linking it to the election as well.

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
14. Ok, it's starting to make sense (or rather no sense...)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:45 AM
Nov 2012

It seems like it is less complex than I thought. In a nutshell: Freepers tried to peddle a conspiracy theory and failed.

So there really was no connection between the mistress and Benghazi.

I thought I had read something about the emails containing classified information, but as I said, I didn't really pay much attention to the whole Benghazi/Petraeus subject until I recently realized that DU, after so many weeks, still had threads up about it.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
7. A lady in a restaurant the other day overheard us talking about this and stopped at our
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:25 AM
Nov 2012

table and actually said, "Heard you talking and I think Rice PAID the White House for her job"

I just looked at her and said, "That's the absolutely craziest thing I have ever heard." She walked away shocked.

the wingnuts think Rice misled the public so it wouldn't look like Obama failed in reigning in terrorism during his
presidency (forgetting he got Bin Laden).

When was it clear it was terrorism? Before the election?

Personally, I think this doesn't matter at all. I was an act of murder no matter who did it - a crazed protester or a group who planned it under the cover of basic civil unrest. There is quite a fine distinction. But....they are running this idea to the ground.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
12. LOL!
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:40 AM
Nov 2012

Now, now. You're a pacifist, remember?

But I think a spit-take would have been entirely appropriate. ('Laura Spit Your Drink'?)

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
8. Try this
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:32 AM
Nov 2012

Since Republicans live in their own special universe (and, heck, since you're using the Starship Enterprise as an avatar), let's take that metaphor and run with it.

Think of Benghazi as the sun. Think of the various things that make Republicans apoplectic about Benghazi as planets orbiting that sun.

Planet 1 is supposedly Rice's performance on the Sunday shows after Benghazi, where she conveyed talking points that later proved to be inaccurate or incomplete.

Planet 2 is the Petraeus thing, which is unrelated to Benghazi per se but which led to his resignation right before the Benghazi hearings, something wingnuts decided was suspicious.

Basically, GOPstronomers are looking for signs of life on one of these planets, while hoping to discover other planets as well. They've already conceded that Planet Petreaus, like our own Venus, is hot and humid but cannot sustain life. So now they've got McCain, a/k/a "Rover," crawling all over the surface of Planet Rice. No life there yet either, but the probe continues.

Make sense now?

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
10. Beautiful . . . EXCEPT (wait for it) . . . all those planets
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:35 AM
Nov 2012

revolve around the Earth which is only 6,000 years old.

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
11. A little, bit. But I think here on DU it was suggested ...
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:36 AM
Nov 2012

... that there was some conspiracy to Carter-ize Obama over Benghazi and that Petraeus and his mistress were involved in it.

I think there was a thread up on the topic for a long time, but I don't remember the exact title.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
15. Yeah, our side has a couple of nutso theories too
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:50 AM
Nov 2012

One is that military support was deliberately withheld during the Benghazi attack in order to tar Obama with a debacle similar to the botched Iran rescue mission in 1980 -- with the similar result of making him a one-term president.

Similar, but even further out there, is the notion that this was somehow all about a coup that Obama discovered and foiled. This is basically the plot of the 1950's potboiler 7 Days in May, which is a fine book and better movie but -- and I really can't stress this enough -- is fiction.

Luckily, our side confines its tinfoil-hat types to internet forums, which is why the above goofiness had no legs. Their side, however, gives their tinfoil-hat types jobs on Fox and seats in the Senate, which is why we all have to hear it so regularly.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
17. it is because the offical story is inadequate
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:54 AM
Nov 2012

people are filling in the details that we are not allowed to know. Our overseas activities are none of our business.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
19. That's certainly true
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:02 PM
Nov 2012

And probably has everything to do with the CIA presence in the annex that no one is supposed to be talking about. What bugs me is not speculation, which is reasonable in the absence of facts, but the way speculation instantly flies to the furthest reaches of the improbable. Poor William of Occam spins in his grave, desperate for a shave.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm lazy: Can someone sum...