General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI yelled at my parents tonight...
They had called to wish me a happy birthday, and we had a very pleasant chat...
Until somehow we found ourselves talking about fracking. And the Keystone Pipeline.
Now, they were Republicans for all the years I was growing up, and beyond...But about oh maybe 8-10 years ago, they re-registered as Democrats. They have been faithfully voting for Democrats for some time now. I could not be any more pleased!
But I guess some of their attitudes are still Republican.
And that's why I yelled at them.
So. I need good, solid references to show them the error of their ways, and I hope that you good people can help me out. They need facts.
I hope you can help.
elleng
(130,974 posts)I'm sure you'll hear from plenty here about fracking, but this about Susan Rice and Keystone, MAYBE relevant to her possible position as SOS: State has something to say about approving Keystone, and she's got investments.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystone_Pipeline
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Be honest with yourself: Do you think the references and facts will really help? Will they actually change their minds, when it's probably their emotions that ar causing them to believe this way? Will it be worth it?
Edited to add: Happy Birthday.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)I don't do it often, but I sure can.
The references will help, because my dad especially is not basing his ideas on emotions. He is a very hard-headed, intellectual person, and highly educated. There is nothing emotional about this for him.
It will be worth it, for sure.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)the oil companies will own it and they will sell it on the open market
it is dirty oil
it will not help this country one bit
to make it flow through the pipes they have to add chemicals
if it spills or leaks it is much harder to clean
it will cross the aquifer in the middle of the US
if it spills there we will run out of water
add: gas prices will go up in the Mid-West
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)I think they already know these facts, but maybe not.
I'll give these a shot.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)I have a family member who works in the trucking business. Back when the issue first came up, he was pissed at President Obama, because "we need the jobs"
Till I pointed out that there will be a couple years of jobs, and then they will go away. The pipeline is just a way to avoid paying truckers to move the oil, so that they can actually net reduce jobs.
Which part of the issue are the points of conflict?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)I pointed out that the chemicals used end up in the drinking water, and some people have been able to set their tap water on fire.
My dad thinks that fracking is an excellent way to get oil out of the ground. He also thinks that this will go on for a long time, and produce lots of usable oil.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)definitely not support this pipe-line. From the National Wildlife site:
http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/Media-Center/Reports/Archive/2010/Tar-Sands-Staying-Hooked-on-a-Dirty-Fuel.aspx
Communities that live near the tar sands are already experiencing health problems linked to the pollution, and dozens of wildlife species are at risk, including millions of migrating cranes, swans, and songbirds. If Keystone XL crosses our border, it will cut through thousands of miles of sensitive habitat in Americas heartland. When the tar sands are refined in U.S. facilities, the resulting pollution will foul our air and water.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)quakerboy
(13,920 posts)Chemicals end up in drinking water. There are also issues with seismic problems.
If all you care about is getting oil, then he is right, this is a way to get oil out of the ground. And it will probably go on for a long time, and produce lots of oil.
Wikipedia has some decent references and explanation of the issues.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing
Try this link for some fairly factual discussion of the issues, as well.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-11/gsoa-hfv110412.php
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)quakerboy
(13,920 posts)If you need more in depth stuff, I can go looking. All depends on how many citations and what level of research you want.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)My Dad is a scholar, with a Ph.D. He knows facts, and that's what I want to give him. Rigorous facts, written by people with impeccable credentials.
I don't need a lot, though. A few good ones will be more than enough.
Thank you!
rightsideout
(978 posts)Most of it will be exported. It will only benefit the oil companies.
Tell him the oil companies are only interested in shoving a pipe up America's butt to make money.
Then there is the added CO2 from burning the stuff, but that just adds another argument to the controversy.
I find that you can't argue with these people even when you present the facts.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)My Dad is pretty factually oriented. He is not driven by emotions.
Thanks!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)So we are getting ready to destroy huge areas of our environment just so other people can profit, not even the American people.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)Along with the globally catastrophic amount of greenhouse gasses such as naturally sequestered methane, released by stripping away thousands of acres of virgin boreal habitat, a huge amount of electricity is needed to run the process in which the tar sands separated and diluted with pristine FRESH WATER, (of which we may have a crisis over sometime in the future.) Its a big FU to future generations.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)on a totally unrelated note!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)You can go off-topic anytime you like!
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)May yours beat for many, many more years...
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)I'm hoping so too...
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)I'm so sorry it came to this for you. I do hope all is better soon.
..edit to change one word
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)DCKit
(18,541 posts)PATXgirl
(192 posts)Didn't know what fracking was before but after watching that documentary, knew all I wanted to know about it.
txwhitedove
(3,929 posts)if the paperwork, record keeping and accountability are any indication of "normal" procedures for the companies involved - then God help us all with the XL leg of the pipeline pushing dangerous product. I know nothing of their security measures. The part I have seen is comparable to building a nuclear power plant to blow out lots of energy to lots of people without a real handle on who did what/who gets what/and oh now what do we do with the waste?
rainin
(3,011 posts)I'm sorry I have nothing to add to the conversation about fracking. In fact, I am learning myself as I read these very informed responses.
I only want to sympathize with you that you are having this familial discord. I am hopelessly related to ardent right wing republicans. My mom really set me off yesterday when she actually told me I should watch Fox news more - I might learn something.
I realize from your post/responses that your cause is not lost. At least your parents sound reasonable. I am sympathizing with you about how you must feel that you yelled at them. I feel terrible. But, there is nothing I can do. I just feel terrible that they got her. I wish I could do an intervention. But with me, it's hopeless. Fox News and the church have her. I lose.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)It was on Facebook. He was cheering on some idiotic idea someone had about transporting the tar sands oil on railroad tankers if the pipeline didn't go through. I pointed out how utterly stupid that was, given the consequences should that train derail, especially in his backyard. He made the usual excuses, to which I just asked him two questions:
1. Why do you think that pipeline ends at the Gulf of Mexico, and not at some the US refineries? Do you actually think it's going to stay here in the US?
2. If that oil is so great and useful and non-toxic, why aren't the Canadians refining it in their own country? They DO have oil refineries. Why are they running it through the US, and not over to one of their coastlines?
I don't know if I completely convinced my brother of how utterly wrong he is. But, he did do what he always does when somebody (usually me or my sister) points out that whatever he just posted is wrong and stupid--he deleted the whole thing.