General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat is the republicans role in Benghazi?
There's something about the Benghazi mess that is clear to me. Republicans are trying to make a scandal out of a terrorist attack. But what if it wasn't just a terrorist attack? Why have the Republicans been having fits over it? Republicans doth protest too much. This is a big red flag. Is there something they don't want us to know?
I always thought the way Benghazi worked out and the timing was suspicious. Romney seemed a little too confident about victory, particularly over the summer. Benghazi happened before Romney received security briefings. Romney's response was over the top. Then the republicans started hearings before the election with the expectation they would find something. After that, Romney took shots at Obama about Benghazi during the debate and got crushed. But again, he behaved like he knew something.
I think the republicans are creating a smokescreen to cover their own role in the Benghazi mess.
still_one
(92,224 posts)Republicans were actually involved in attacking the embassy
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)still_one
(92,224 posts)Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)I don't get it.
still_one
(92,224 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)But now they want to waste Obama's time like they did for Clinton with Whitewater, etc.
Historic NY
(37,451 posts)The consulate office was placed right in the middle of a CIA operations to provided cover. They know but they are like yipping dogs.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)of it, either--the GOP is focused on what was said AFTER the fact.
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)For all of Rohrbachers talk about "four dead americans" he and the republicans are focused on what was said after the fact.