General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUPDATE: " Bradley Manning Trial" for those Dems who are Civil Rights Advocates!
Bradley Mannings Unlawful Pretrial Punishment Hearing, Day 2
By: Kevin Gosztola Wednesday November 28, 2012 9:38 am
UPDATE 6:40 PM EST Coombs asked Dr. Hoctor if reasons why Manning was on POI status were transparent. Hoctor answered, It became clearer over time what was going on.
I think they were really very worried about his safety and I dont think they trusted any doctors. He also mentioned suicides had been a problem in the military in general. Thered been suicide on base and a suicide in the brig.
He also said the commanding officers of the Brig decided they were going to run the risk management aspect of this case. I just wish they would have told me that in more certain terms that was what they intended to do.
UPDATE 6:35 PM EST Another hearing extending late into the evening. And much to catch up on.
Navy Captain Dr. William Hoctor, the psychiatrist who was seeing Manning, took the stand. There was a lighter moment in the proceedings when Hoctor said dancing in his cell did not bother him. Hes sitting in his cell all day, he said. Hes got to do something to amuse himself.
This and peek-a-boo he was playing with the bars is conduct the commanders who have taken the stand both Choike and Oltman have cited this activity when justifying keeping him on prevention of injury status.
UPDATE 2:25 PM EST Defense finishes cross-examination of Col. Oltman. Oltman grew increasingly disgusted with Coombs during questioning. Coombs kept going up to hand him a document (emails) to read. He became agitated at one point: Again, youre going to hand me something to look at and flipped his hands. He was tired of Coombs asking if he recalled something only to be handed a document minutes later confirming he did say what he could not recall.
UPDATE 1:35 PM EST Oltman was asked about what he knew happened in the March 2 incident where Manning jokingly or in a matter-of-fact manner stated if he wanted to kill himself he could with his underwear waistband or flip-flops. He said this to a master sergeant who was talking to him about his POI status. (Papatke? We dont get access to court records so guessing.)
MORE at: and an EXCELLENT READ AT:
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I've been following on twitter. @kgosztola https://twitter.com/kgosztola
The media is not allowed to take notes so he can only report during breaks. There are other indy media there as well, usually around 3 on trial days but the prospect of Manning testifying, which he probably will do tomorrow has the big news orgs vying for a press pass. Yesteday, CNN didn't make the cut... I am not sure about today.
Some other coverage
Alexa O'Brien @carwinb https://twitter.com/carwinb
Nathan Fuller ?@nathanLfuller https://twitter.com/nathanLfuller
Art Supereroes @WikileaksTruck https://twitter.com/WikileaksTruck
Adam Klasfeld @onearmedmaninc https://twitter.com/onearmedmaninc
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)travelled the country and knew what he was talking about rather than deliver talking points or play guessing games like the rest of the media does.
He has gained a very good reputation as someone who actually does the work of a good reporter something really rare these days.
I follow him on Twitter also.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I started this DU thread post Kevin's (and other journalists) tweets that they made during breaks.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021902885
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)and we stop hearing about his dumb, idiot, oath breaking piece of shit ass.
Agony
(2,605 posts)regardless of any other silliness.
full stop
randome
(34,845 posts)I don't think there IS a humanity oath in the U.S. military, is there?
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)He's a disgrace to the uniform and the nation.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)I have far more respect for someone who is willing to do that right thing than I do someone who blindly follows orders.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)look the other way when other human beings were being tortured, humiliated and killed without any trial or proof of guilt.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)I know what the fuck Manning did is illegal as shit and compromised his fellow soldiers.
He's shit and deserves far more punishment than he will ever receive.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)And he's the one who gets punished.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Our entire system is set up to benefit the powerful. Why should this situation be any different?
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)countries throughout history when wrong was always right and the powerful beneficiaries of the system were always right.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Manning is a hero. If you want to kiss the ass of the military-industrial establishment, you are in the wrong party Romney...whatever.
It's usually the right wing that hates whistle blowers.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)quite a few in the military have (or had) a top secret clearance. It doesn't make you the be all and end all of what is right and proper. Clamber down off that high horse, because you are looking increasingly ridiculous sitting up there waving your sword and smacking yourself in the face with your own knees.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)are those who support Manning.
Just like wingnuts looked ridiculous supporting Scooter Libby.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)millions world wide who support a soldier who witnessed war crimes in progress, took his oath seriously, reported them, and was told to be quiet. He then took the courageous step of becoming a Whistle Blower.
He tried to stop torture and he paid a price. The torturers otoh, have not even been investigated.
He had morals, but morals are not in style these days. The only ridiculous thing about all of this is that the wrong person on trial.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)That and churning out good little soldiers who do nothing but take orders. Can't have someone in the military thinking for themselves, can we? I'd strongly suggest educating yourself on this matter, but somehow I don't see that happening. You might want to start with the Nuremberg Trials.
mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)code of honor as well as to obey commands. Sometimes the two conflict.
We shall see what the testimony is at the trial.
I have heard that Manning reported criminal conduct to his superior officer and that no action was taken.
That does not excuse his release of such large number of records and information in my opinion. But it is somewhat mitigating. His superior officer had the same duty to obey military law as Manning did. Again, not an excuse, but perhaps mitigating when it comes to deciding his punishment.
We shall see what happens.
randome
(34,845 posts)Simply because he was emotionally unbalanced and his superiors ignored the signs.
But he did break his oath and he did not personally review the thousands of documents he handed over to a foreign national.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)were following a code also. Doesnt make it moral.
Shame on those that want to turn their backs on atrocities because of some stupid ass rational like, "he signed a pledge".
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)But there was no reason to break an 'oath to humanity' by handing over documents too numerous to review to a foreign national. That's not whistleblowing. We have very clear avenues to pursue for whistleblowing.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)follow and kill as ordered and/or ignore atrocities. Of course security is the rationalization. It always is.
randome
(34,845 posts)In fact, there is a special avenue to follow for the military known as The Military Whistleblower Protection Act.
Other countries have followed our lead on this and other whistleblower protections.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Generally they offer very little protection.
randome
(34,845 posts)There are tons of supporting laws such as No FEAR Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, even the Freedom of Information Act. You can hate on 'authoritarians' all you want but the truth is our country provides a LOT of protection for whistleblowers.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)Even the Obama administration has been extremely hard on whistle blowers. In fact, it's very easy to argue that the Obama administration has been harder on whistle blowers than any other administration in the past. If you think that the U.S. offers substantial protection for whistle blowers, you're fooling yourself. It's all just lip service. Reality tells a far different story:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-18/obama-pursuing-leakers-sends-warning-to-whistle-blowers.html
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/obamas-whistleblowers-stuxnet-leaks-drones
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/05/obama-campaign-brags-about-whistleblower-persecutions
randome
(34,845 posts)You want to be a Whistleblower, follow the procedures. I'm sure it isn't rocket science.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)You said that the U.S. is oh so great at protecting whistle blowers. That's utter bullshit. The U.S. is fucking horrible at protecting whistle blowers. All it offers is lip service. The Obama administration is probably the worst administration that there has ever been in terms of protecting whistle blowers. Are you familiar with the WWI Espionage Act? The Obama administration has prosecuted more people under it THAN ALL OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS COMBINED. Does that sicken you even just a little bit? This sure isn't rocket science.
randome
(34,845 posts)You want to be a whistleblower, follow the procedures. You don't hand over classified information to a blogger, as Shamai Leibowitz did.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)the point. The Obama administration has been extremely hard on whistle blowers who followed every proper channel they were supposed to. You can't say that these "leakers" should follow proper whistle blowing procedure and they'll be hunky dory when this administration and pretty much every administration that has come before it has proven time and time again that it doesn't give one damn for whistle blowers. It's an absolutely ridiculous argument.
randome
(34,845 posts)He also signed the Whistle Blower Enhancement Act. Progress has been made and is being made. I'm sure it can be better.
But no one should get away with handing over classified documents -WITHOUT REVIEW- to a foreign national. Manning knew about one incident. The other documents he knew nothing about. He didn't care if it put anyone else at risk.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)"I'm sure it can be better", well it sure as hell can't get much worse. Manning is NOT being prosecuted because what he released was damaging to the U.S., he's being prosecuted because what he released is embarrassing to the U.S.. There's a big difference.
Hayabusa
(2,135 posts)More often than not, I'd imagine that they just serve the purpose of letting the place know that you have the information. Guess what would have happened to Manning if he had gone through the proper channels? He'd probably have "committed suicide" shortly afterwards. Hell, if the case wasn't so widely know, he probably would have anyway.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Considering him a hero is delusional, IMO.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Are you going to defend pre- trial treatment that qualifies as ...torture?
That is actually one of the things at trial here...and us joining lovely places like oh...Iran in this respect.
Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)Being put in a smock so you don't hang yourself and being placed in a solitary cell is hardly torture. Frankly, it's offensive to those who have had to go through it.
A high profile prisoner states that he just wants to kill himself and expects no reaction? Anyone who has been in the Army for more than 45 minutes knows that nowadays that just doesn't fly, especially in a case like his.
He was a troubled Soldier (classic 10%er) and it seems like he wanted to lash out at those who he perceived as having "wronged" him. I've had dozens just like him pass through. He just managed to crash and burn in a particularly spectacular way.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Disagree with you, and I will leave it at that.
Oh you are in the army, you know the UCMJ forbids pre trial punishment as well.
You defend that.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)The standards of Nuremberg made that much clear.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)The standards of the UCMJ make it clear.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)Concentration camp overseers should go free because they followed orders.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Nuremberg does not apply in the slightest in this case.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Next.
But you have not yet dealt with the pre-trial treatment which contravenes the UCMJ. So not knowing how Nuremberg might apply, I understand.
randome
(34,845 posts)That doesn't mean it did not occur but there needs to be some evidence of it before the judge takes it into consideration.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)If you reply to me and I don't respond, the safest assumption is I am ignoring you.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)You still handle the truth.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)Much easier to only converse with people who have the same extremely limited world view that you do.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)Manning is being punished because what he exposed was EMBARRASSING to the U.S., not because what he exposed put the U.S. at risk. You should really learn the difference.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)way behind.
Hayabusa
(2,135 posts)laws of war that make what he exposed clear as well.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | MFP Sun Oct-01-06 03:44 AM
Original message
What My Father Saw at Nuremberg (Christopher Dodd)
What My Father Saw at Nuremberg
Sixty years ago today, my father watched the U.S. win the battle of ideas.
Have we lost our way?
By Christopher Dodd, SEN. CHRISTOPHER DODD (D-CONN.) is a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
October 1, 2006
.. At Nuremberg, we rejected the certainty of execution for the uncertainty of a trial. The test was one of principle over power, and the United States passed.
President Harry Truman understood that our nation's ability to bring about a world of peace and justice was rooted not in our military might but in our moral authority; not on the ability to compel people with our tanks and planes but to convince them that our values and our ideals were right. He understood that our ability to succeed in spreading American values of freedom and human rights are only as effective as our willingness to uphold them ..
Today, we debate secret prisons, suspension of habeas corpus, warrant-less searches and wiretaps. The president even asks us to reinterpret the Geneva accords to sanction the torture of enemy prisoners ..
We would do well to remember the words of Justice Jackson: "We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our own lips as well."
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-dodd1oct01,0,6859766.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=238083&mesg_id=238083
Agony
(2,605 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)your spewing about him?
If you want others to convince then you need to give them convincing evidence of your own viewpoint to get them to take you seriously.
So far you just spew hate...for no seeming, rational reason...
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)I have precisely ZERO sympathy for a Blue Falcon like Manning.
The fucker will never be punished to the level he deserves.
He's worse than the fuckers who abandoned their posts because they're birthers. He revealed shit that could have got fellow soldiers killed.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)He can never be rewarded to the level he deserves. The people who followed orders and kept quiet about torture are the ones who should be punished. I have no use for them or anyone who defends them.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)How do you feel about Bush, did you follow all the orders that Chicken Hawk gave you?
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Manning is shit. He's going down and he's never getting out.
Good riddance to bad trash.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)Look up "standards of Nuremberg".
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)We have our haters too!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Look it up
EOTE
(13,409 posts)The military really hates folks who can think for themselves. It's pretty sickening how the military industrial complex has fucked this country. It's also sickening how good it is at creating pathetic sycophants who'll excuse any fucking atrocity the military commits.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)anymore than the abused he exposed got a trial or any proof of guilt.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)He's scum.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:01 AM - Edit history (1)
Say either..
A coverup of War crimes or
An assassination plot to kill the president or
A military overthrow of the US government or
A medical report of experimentation on unknowing, uninformed soldiers
What would you do ???!!!
You can take that classified documents reasoning and shove it up your god damn, moronic Ass.
Authoritarians like you do not belong on a liberal progressive forum like DU imo.
I would like to think that you would try to read more about this young man and his case, but I know you will not.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)By Raf Sanchez, Washington
9:00PM GMT 18 Dec 2011
... Captain Casey Fulton, who served in the same unit, said on Sunday that during one late night shift in May 2010 she found Pte Manning pinned to the ground by his female superior, Specialist Jihrleah Showman.
"<Showman> said he had struck her and she had a big red welt on her face," Captain Fulton said ...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8964543/Bradley-Manning-attacked-female-soldier-and-sent-picture-of-himself-as-a-woman.html
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)but it does demonstrate his character.
Classic 10%er.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)She must have been trembling in fear.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)incident, so I will redact that---
(01:44:33 PM) bradass87: DADT isnt really enforced
(01:44:56 PM) bradass87: top interrogator here has a civil union in NJ
(01:45:18 PM) bradass87: i punched a **** in the phace
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/manning-lamo-logs/
Apparently she pinned him down after that.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)for psychiatric investigation and/or discharge. I wonder why he wasn't.
Seems to me it was pretty obvious that he had problems and that there may have been problems in his unit if not beyond.
During the Viet Nam War, recruits were discharged for less.
We have a volunteer military. It seems to me that if someone is clearly unsuited for military life, they should be discharged.
This whole matter did not need to happen.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)His own words---
02:59:41 PM) bradass87: GID discharge family issuess and possibility of transition in near future
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/manning-lamo-logs/
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)That the material released put anybody at even an iota of risk, but you probably do not realize that.
What he released though, proved highly embarrassing, to put it mildly.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Well, that's one way to put a dishonest spin on it, I guess.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)He's a traitorous bastard who is lucky he wasn't charged with open treason.
I see DUers throw around the treason word like it's meaningless and when a real case of treason comes up, some will put the traitor on a pedestal.
Same crap happens on the rightwing sites. They throw around the word treason, yet when Scooter Libby is demonstrated to be a real traitor, the right wing assholes put that traitor on a pedestal.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Human rights trump oaths designed to keep atrocities a secret.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)However, authoritarian posters like the one you are replying to can't see beyond orders and oaths.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Your rational that he was in the service and therefor his pledge trumps humanity and morality is sad. Strange that it is the same as my right-wing brother in law.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)George Bush. War criminal. Bradley actually did something to get him closer to justice.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)How can anybody support that?
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)throwing out international agreements and conventions with impunity. 100,000+ Iraqis citizens are dead because of him and his WMD-crazed oil grab. George Bush is a criminal using the law to avoid punishment. Anyone bringing him to justice is a hero. Monsters abusing the law do not get a pass, but those bringing them to justice do.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Had Manning confined his doc dump to only such as you describe, he might have some semblance of a defense.
He did not. He engaged in espionage and aided and abetted the enemy. He is a traitor and a disgrace. iMO, he deserves the death penalty.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Are you familiar with the Geneva Convention?
Yes, even the UCMJ contemplates that one.
Regardless, I am still waiting for you to answer the detention mistreatment. Lets start at the basics here.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Many people on DU claim to be things they aren't.
Suffice it to say, they will never get it, no serious as a heart attack, they don't get it and continue to claim careers and knowledge of things they no little of.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)From that point on it, under international law, it was the duty of every soldier to obstruct in any way possible.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Principle IV states: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him".
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'".
Principle VII states, "Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law."
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)follow and kill as ordered and/or ignore atrocities. Of course security is the rationalization. It always is.
I posted this in #70 but thought it could be said again.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And releasing large amounts of classified information, not knowing what was in them, is not whistle blowing. In no way. It is irresponsible.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)We need more Mannings in this world. Wikileaks and Anonymous are doing great things too.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)By David Dishneau, The Associated Press
9:08 p.m. EST, November 28, 2012
An Army private accused of sending reams of classified U.S. documents to the secret-spilling website WikiLeaks was kept in tight pretrial confinement partly because another prisoner had recently committed suicide, the former security chief at the Quantico, Va., Marine Corps base testified Wednesday.
Marine Col. Robert Oltman appeared as a witness on the second day of a pretrial hearing for Pfc. Bradley Manning, who is seeking dismissal of all charges, claiming his confinement in the Quantico brig amounted to illegal punishment.
Oltman and others have testified that psychiatrists who examined Manning at Quantico repeatedly recommended that his conditions be eased. But Oltman, whose command included the brig, said he was skeptical about at least one of those recommendations because another detainee had killed himself in December 2009 after his custody status was reduced based upon the advice of the same doctor, Navy Capt. William Hocter, the psychiatrist assigned to the brig.
"He didn't have the strongest credibility with me with regards to his recommendations," Oltman said under questioning by civilian defense attorney David Coombs ...
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-manning-wikileaks-20121128,0,7910406.story
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)They're in spaghetti mode, throwing anything against the wall to see if it will stick.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)the Quantico brig was usually used for short-term holding; and when the government finally moved Manning from Quantico they seem to have at the same time permanently closed portions of the Quantico brig. So, naturally, the defense has been soliciting testimony to the effect that Quantico was entirely ill-prepared to house Manning for any extended period
But overall I think the defense is an uphill climb, and that at best he can hope his defense convinces the court: (1) he had serious psychological issues and (2) he didn't inflict huge damage
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I wonder what kind of "confession" they intimidated out of him. Should be interesting to hear his testimony.
As I said before, his superior officers should have sent him packing long before he released all the documents (assuming he released them).
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Hoctor was not the only psychiatrist that recommended easing of Manning's conditions. And did Otlman, keep EVERY prisoner in pretrial confinement when Hoctor, et. al., recommend the easing of conditions? That is, was Oltman selective in rejecting some recommendations over others and was Manning the only one?
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)Manning had killed himself
Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)... and he would be lauded as a martyr who had been assassinated by the military industrial complex.
I don't understand how folks who supposedly prefer diplomacy to military action can side with him. The release of DoS cables made diplomacy more difficult and thus military conflict more likely.
If I, as a foreign nation, have something sensitive to speak to the US about I am less likely to do so if I think that my information is going to be potentially dumped to a group like wikileaks or a spotlight ranger like Assange.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)as reported on the first day of the trial.....so why wasn't he on suicide watch????
10:28 PM EST Overgaard told the court that while detained in Kuwait Manning had created nooses and gathered metal to harm himself. Coombs had no reaction to this when given a chance to rebut argument that professional and records should be made available to the government.
Overgaard indicated the government wanted to use notes from Kuwait on Mannings mental health condition to argue putting him in maximum custody, on prevention of injury status or suicide risk was justified. Coombs said material from Kuwait could be referenced if it had influenced brig psychiatrists or decisions made by commanding officers. However, it did not have any influence it was irrelevant.
The judge granted this order to look at records from evaluations after 2009.
10:23 PM EST Cpt. Angel Overgaard argued a motion for court order for mental health care professionals and records. Overgaard wanted to be able to speak to psychiatrists that had treated or had contact with Manning. She alleged the prosecution wasnt able to question certain individuals because they claimed they needed a waiver. Coombs said none of these people had been told not to talk to the government and, if there really was a problem, he would tell these psychiatrists they should respond to government requests for testimony.
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/08/28/bradley-manning-august-motion-hearing-day-1-live-blog/
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)recommendation. Was the brig commander supposed to take a chance on Manning, arguably his most high profile prisoner? Let's not forget that Manning was put on POI status by that same doctor.
Second, all the cells at the Quantico brig are single. There is no solitary confinement per se..... but there are restrictions on what the prisoner is allowed to do and his access to privileges.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)By Larry Shaughnessy, CNN Pentagon Producer
updated 9:36 PM EST, Thu November 29, 2012
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/29/justice/manning-wikileaks/index.html
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)They caused far more harm than Manning did and I'm sure they violated several laws in the process.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)war is glory, and all altruistic ethical actions that threaten the omnipotence of the Military Industrial Complex are crimes, it is only natural that conservatives would put a hero on trial while giving millions to their bankster ("Masters of the Universe" priests.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)cstanleytech
(26,297 posts)of Manning in this case exactly?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)cstanleytech
(26,297 posts)Or did they torture him gitmo style?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)mistreating him.
Not allowed to exercise. Not allowed to lay down during the day. Only 1/2 hour outside to exercise. No communication with anyone. Florescent lights shone on him throughout the night and if he turned over to avoid them, he was woken up.
The psychiatrists have testified that"
http://www.bradleymanning.org/news/quantico-psychiatrist-bradley-manning-treated-worse-than-death-row-inmates
Quantico psychiatrist: Bradley Manning treated worse than death row inmates
Two mental health professionals testified to the fact that Quantico was the first brig to blithely ignore their recommendations to remove a detainee from restrictive conditions.
Bradleys treatment would continue indefinitely
When Cpt. Hoctor expressed his concerns, and the fact that Bradleys restrictive conditions should not be justified with mental health language, to Col. Robert Oltman, Security Battalion Commander in charge of Quantico, Col. Oltman told him that Cpt. Hoctor should continue to report weekly but that well do what we want to do, and that Bradley would be on POI watch for the foreseeable future.
This made Cpt. Hoctor the angriest [hed] been in a long time, as the treatment was senseless, had no psychiatric justification, and a Battalion Commander had never before said outright that such a confinement statues would continue indefinitely regardless of his recommendations. He also said that this treatment could harm Bradley, as everyone has limits, though hed been strong.
cstanleytech
(26,297 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)He testified that he didn't actually want to die but to get the hell out of his cage. When he got on American soil, his mood improved and two doctors recommended that he be removed from solitary which, in their assessment, would do more damage than good. (And, of course, it is well documented that prolonged solitary IS torture and has long term debilitating effects.)
They stripped him naked, against regulations, and mocked him Dr. Seuess style in emails. They were trying to break him.
cstanleytech
(26,297 posts)classified documents to wikileaks.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)His lawyer is attempting to knock out some of the charges/some of the time BM will be facing, post-conviction.
cstanleytech
(26,297 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)of such evidence as a means to dislodge some of the charges, and cut the eventual sentence. You have a procedure under the UCMJ that allows for what is essentially a due process hearing before trial.
Manning is facing 22 charges, and any plea deal reached with the government would give him decades in prison. So the defense strategy seems to be:
1) Delay trial. Every single day Manning is in pre-trial confinement in medium security in Leavenworth is one day less that he has to serve in max security post conviction.
2) Knock some of the charges out pretrial.
3) Make the case that the holdover in Quantico constituted pre-trial punishment (i.e. he was kept in conditions that were not necessary to keep him from harm, but were punitive) and that equity demands that he get a ratio cut of his sentence served for each day served in the brig---so for every one day in the brig, he might get 3 days off his sentence.
His lawyer will reintroduce all of this at sentencing, but it's a great pre-trial strategy.
cstanleytech
(26,297 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Overgaard indicated the government wanted to use notes from Kuwait on Mannings mental health condition to argue putting him in maximum custody, on prevention of injury status or suicide risk was justified. Coombs said material from Kuwait could be referenced if it had influenced brig psychiatrists or decisions made by commanding officers. However, it did not have any influence it was irrelevant.
The judge granted this order to look at records from evaluations after 2009.
10:23 PM EST Cpt. Angel Overgaard argued a motion for court order for mental health care professionals and records. Overgaard wanted to be able to speak to psychiatrists that had treated or had contact with Manning. She alleged the prosecution wasnt able to question certain individuals because they claimed they needed a waiver. Coombs said none of these people had been told not to talk to the government and, if there really was a problem, he would tell these psychiatrists they should respond to government requests for testimony.
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/08/28/bradley-manning-august-motion-hearing-day-1-live-blog/
How interesting that up until now, the government has not been able to question the government mental health workers who saw this suicidal behavior in Kuwait.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)But people working in military intelligence cannot be given a green light to hand over documents to foreign nationals, either.
Can a President, instead of issuing a pardon, reduce someone's sentence?