Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:25 PM Nov 2012

50.6% to 47.8% is, I don't know, weird...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/obama-elected-2012_n_2084515.html

Not sure whether those are the final official numbers, but I suppose they are pretty accurate.

Just seems to be strange to me. Leaving aside the fact that strategically (through electoral vote) it can be called a landslide, the numbers for the popular vote are a little frightening.

So basically, the rape discussions, the "47% parasites" remark, the forced haircut, the dog on roof, the constant lies, the Sandra Fluke episode, Obama's solid record and "Sandy" and debate bumps, in sum, yield barely a 3% margin in America.

I don't really know what to think. Sure, it is great that the election was won, but somehow these numbers suggest that the country has a long way to go.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
1. They're not done counting in most states, including CA.
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:28 PM
Nov 2012

We need to wait for the election vote total certifications first, I guess.

 

sally5050

(151 posts)
2. Think Election Fraud, vote suppression and other very scary tactics
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:28 PM
Nov 2012

obama missed this grand opportunity to weed out Karl Rove's sincerely devastating election fraud tricks.

rove and romney were surprised for a very good reason.

the real popular vote was likely closer to 20%, that is consistent with brainwashed extreme religious types who prefer a religious zealot that supports their view of the world (romney) than obama.

check into the threads on how a wireless patch was put on hart intercivic machines in 3 states days before the election.
check into the threads here and elsewhere on voter suppression including GOP operatives from florida saying money and strategy went into that instead of GOP get out the vote (meaning they know there aren't enough GOP voters to GET OUT).

but even if that # is 20-30% , it's a scary number. but in my own family only 2 are democrats and the rest are fearful republicans.

fear wins out over sanity every time.

we must teach our children to battle the inner demons of fear which might drive them to behave like a sorry republican.

godai

(2,902 posts)
4. Compared to Bush (500 and 70K 'victories'), it is a landslide.
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:37 PM
Nov 2012

Rove and co. divided the country and so it remains. Red states are very red.

malthaussen

(17,217 posts)
5. 45% of the female vote is what bugs me the most
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:41 PM
Nov 2012

If the assaults by the GOP on the distaff voters could only persuade 55% of them to vote Democratic, then something is seriously wrong with their diets.

-- Mal

David__77

(23,553 posts)
6. Reagan, who was 100 times worse than Romney, won in a landslide twice.
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:50 PM
Nov 2012

I'd say that the country is making progress. Reagan was a nut who could have easily led humanity to thermonuclear annihilation. His cabal was an evil mix of Birchers, racists, and Friedmanite radicals. Romney could not hope to be so evil.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,243 posts)
7. 332 electoral votes is a landslide by any metric. The president has a +4 mil popular vote spread.
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:55 PM
Nov 2012

People should stop obsessing about the numbers at this point. Remember a little rain event called Sandy? It devastated certain blue regions of the country, which may account for a 2-3% deficit in the popular vote. There were also people who were just utterly confused and exasperated by the GOP's efforts, in many states, to suppress the vote. There's no way to know how many people, after hearing all the news, and seeing the hours long lines outside the polling places, decided just not to participate.

My belief is that this election would have been much closer to the '08 results if not for Sandy and GOP voter intimidation. JMHO.

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
9. I'd say 400, but there is no real definition to what is or what isn't
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 02:03 PM
Nov 2012

I personally think the last landslide was 1988. If we use the term to much, like 1992, 1996, 2008, and 2012, it cheapens it. I'm starting to think there will never be another true landslide again.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,243 posts)
11. When some analysts were laying odds that the president would cobble together enough EV's to just....
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 05:04 PM
Nov 2012

break 270, I'm gonna stick with "LANDSLIDE", which = MANDATE. But thanks anyhoo.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
8. Hate for this President runs deep among many americans.
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:59 PM
Nov 2012

They won't come out and say it, but many of Romney's voters would not vote for a Black and many would not vote for a woman, Hispanic or Asian, regardless of the person's ability. I would put that number as high as half of Romney's vote count, that would work out to around 25% of all americans.

President Obama has a lot to like. He is a big family man. Went through marital problems, but is in a clearly strong marriage and he loves his wife. He cares about the country. He is respectful toward his opposition, even when they say horrible things about him and behaves badly in his presence. And he is as smart as Clinton and is one of the smartest Presidents that the nation has had in 100+ years, I put hm in the category with Clinton, FDR and Teddy R in terms of intellectual abilities. The President's accomplishments lag FDR's a bit, but my sense is that he has surpassed Clinton and is flush with Teddy Roosevelt.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»50.6% to 47.8% is, I don'...