General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeople Without Facebook Accounts Are Deemed 'Suspicious' -- Forbes
[font size="3"]Beware, Tech Abandoners. People Without Facebook Accounts Are 'Suspicious'[/font]-- Kashmir Hill, Forbes
The sudden and dramatic advent of social-media-enabling technologies into our lives seems to be causing some mid-digital-life crises. Not only has Silicon Valley developed a guilty conscience about addicting us to screens, we the users are starting to question how technology is changing us: making us fat, making us unhealthy, making us depressed, making us lonely... Thats leading some users to consider abandoning the whole enterprise. My colleague Haydn Shaughnessy gave up his smartphone last year. Now, inspired by the example of former Facebooker Katherine Losse, hes considering giving up Facebook.
I am writing with some words of caution. I used to say that "if you're not on Facebook, it's possible you don't actually exist." I think its time to update that, courtesy of Slashdot: Facebook abstainers will be labeled suspicious.
Slashdot flagged a German news story in which an expert noted that mass murderers Anders Breivik and James Holmes both lacked much of a social media presence, leading to the conclusion, in Slashdots phrasing, that not having a Facebook account could be the first sign that you are a mass murderer.
Im seeing the suggestion more and more often that a missing Facebook account raises red flags. After a woman found out via Facebook that a man whod poked her in real life had a long term girlfriend, she turned to digital manners advice givers Farhad Manjoo and Emily Yoffe of Slate to ask whether she should tell the girlfriend. They said she should and then went on a digression about transparent romances in the age of Facebook:
Emily: Wait a minute. You may have mentioned that.
Farhad: I think Ive recommended that. You know why, though? Imagine if this guy didnt have a Facebook profile. Thats why. You should be suspicious of someone who is not making your relationship known publicly on a site like Facebook. Im going to go on record with that.
Emily: Im fine with people not having a Facebook page if they dont want one. However, I think youre right. If youre of a certain age and you meet someone who you are about to go to bed with, and that person doesnt have a Facebook page, you may be getting a false name. It could be some kind of red flag.
via Transcript : Facebook stalker - "Should I tell a cheating guy's girlfriend that we hooked up?" -- Slate Magazine
The idea that a Facebook resister is a potential mass murderer, flaky employee, and/or person who struggles with fidelity is obviously flawed. There are people who choose not to be Facebookers for myriad non-psychopathic reasons: because they find it too addictive, or because they hold their privacy dear, or because they dont actually want to know what their old high school buddies are up to.
Anecdotally, Ive heard both job seekers and employers wonder aloud about what it means if a job candidate doesnt have a Facebook account. Does it mean they deactivated it because it was full of red flags? Are they hiding something?
But it does seem that increasingly, its expected that everyone is on Facebook in some capacity, and that a negative assumption is starting to arise about those who reject the Big Blue Giants siren call. Continuing to navigate life without having this digital form of identification may be like trying to get into a bar without a drivers license.
You cant get away from it. Its everything. Its everywhere, she told the Washington Post. The moment were in now is about trying to deal with all this technology rather than rejecting it, because obviously we cant reject it entirely. Well, you can, but it might lead to your being rejected down the line too. **Updated to include some reasons why a person might choose not to be on Facebook, beyond being too busy planning commando attacks.
* Craigslist Ad: 'You're Only Real If You Have A Facebook Account'
* Another update: Haydn responds (and critiques)!
* A follow-up story: You Don't Need A Facebook Account To Be Considered 'Normal' (But It Helps)
* Also, check out the replies...
Its very popular nowadays to hate Facebook among the counterculture, [font color="green"]counterculture[/font] but just because [font color="green"]your friends[/font] are useless on Facebook doesnt mean that Facebook is not a big part of peoples lives in this day and age, especially among the younger crowd that uses this networking.
-If you want to ask someone out, you can know immediately if theyre already with someone or available using Facebook.
-Many people dont have time to keep up with many people at once, or have multiple social circles that are all completely disconnected. For example, [font color="green"]Ive moved 20+ times in my life,[/font] so I have social circles from each of these places I lived and I dont have time to call each and every one of these people individually to make sure we still have a relationship. However, a relationship is maintained by comments on statuses and by being aware of whats going on in the others life.
-Facebook has become an incredibly easy way to plan events. Free to invite, can easily get the information out about an event you would like people to go to, and instant so you can know whos coming to your party or other event immediately. It can be used to contact hundreds of people at once. One of my friends just made a status a few days ago about having an extra ticket to a concert, and wanting to go with someone. Without Facebook, she would have had to contact each person she was willing to go with, see if they enjoyed the band, was free, and wanted to hang out. Instead she opened the opportunity to reconnect with old friends that she hadnt talked to in a while...
[font color="green"]Maybe youre just too old for Facebook, honestly.[/font] This is coming from the point of view of a [font color="green"]19 year old college student at a top 20 university,[/font] (and) I recognize that within my age group [font color="green"]Facebook is nearly essential to socializing.[/font] I do know a few people that dont use Facebook. I also know that [font color="green"]I would like to contact them,[/font] but considering I didnt assume they dont use Facebook when I met them I dont have their phone numbers and [font color="green"]because they reject Facebook I have no way to contact them.[/font] People I would like to see I end up never seeing because they dont use Facebook. [font color="green"]I also end up having to recount my entire life[/font] every time I see someone who doesnt use it, [font color="green"]because they dont see status updates[/font] or changes...
Keep in mind that Facebook is only as good as your friends. If you have crappy friends that only post useless things, then you would have a bad Facebook experience. If you have [font color="green"]higher quality friends[/font] who use Facebook as a social networking tool, then your experience is far improved [font color="green"]and it becomes more essential to your life.[/font]
To refer to facebook as an essential part of Life is really kind of sad. Yes, it is a large part of many peoples lives. Guess what though, it doesnt need to be! it wasnt an essential part of anyones life pre-myspace, if you wanted to see what your friends were up to, youd call them up and theyd call up other friends and they would call up others and you would all meet up somewhere and hang out and INTERACT PHYSICALLY with one another.
Also pointing out the fact that you are coming from the point of view of a 19yo is about as pointless as anything. You were born into technology. You are practically Borg. You have no history of life BEFORE the internet. Only Vague memories of phones with cords on them and Cellular phones you could kill a horse with. This is coming from a 35yo Network Administrator, who, btw, does have a facebook page but thinks updating my status every 15minutes is just plain retarded. I have managed to reconnect with a few friends from my past, but mostly I use it for the fact that it has a single signon function for many pages that I visit regularly. I, in fact, have NEVER updated a status on my Facebrik page.. even once.
Simply put, pull your head out of the facebook cloud and actually go an interact with people! soanso is now doing something retarded! is not interaction.. Try Shaking someones hand, or talking to them without using your thumbs. you may find it pretty rewarding!
Milx replies:
I understand that people drop Facebook for various reasons. What you dont understand is that that makes no difference to my point whatsoever. It doesnt make a difference to the point that in my age bracket, using Facebook makes everything a million times easier and more convenient. When people around my age dont have a Facebook it usually ends up with them becoming more socially isolated, due to all the easy ways to keep in contact through Facebook. Either that, or theyre already socially isolated so see no need for it. I know why the few friends I have that dont have Facebooks dont have them, and none of them were citing business practices as their reason... That was the point I was making, that for people around my age, not having Facebook is a serious decision that actually has a lasting effect on your social life.
Im not speaking for your age bracket, or your social group. Im speaking for mine, and expressing the flip side of FACEBOOK IS DUMB EVERYONE ON IT IS STUPID HURR
schmoe replies:
This is hilarious. Im in your age bracket and I remember being very young and very fond of computers and especially the internet before it gained critical mass. It was an absolute nightmare trying to convince anyone that this stuff wasnt just for nerds. Things like IRC where you could have actual, immediate conversations were looked at as weird and creepy. People dont even remember the older social sites like xanga, bolt or friendster. What was popular? Ad plastered AIM and MSN. Same damn thing as ICQ, which they wouldve never touched.
Now the same people that were confused and wary of technology are calling other people creepy for not using the same technologies they once labeled nerdy. I guess this is because of the general culture shift to elevating prepackaged nerdiness as defined by TV shows. Now you can be a nerd too by just pressing big icons on a smartphone. Aint life grand?
Some people have moved on, some people want privacy, and some people just dont give a damn about you waiting in line for a burger.
Lao Tsu writes:
I do believe youre one of the sanest people, Ive encountered on the net.
Thank you for seeing this stuff in context of reality, not in context of internet hype.
Leaving FB isnt a cry for help, its a choice to use time better and lose petty schoolyard, drama queens and stalkers.
The funny thing is the increased social acceptability of very creepy behaviour by people and companies on social networks.
Despite all the additional political correctness in the world, the lack of social correctness and sociopathic behaviour of people on the web is amazing .not trolls, ordinary people.
Related:
Facebook, Smart Phones An Unprecedented Tool For Law Enforcement Data Collection
Using Twitter To Help Expose Psychopaths
Is Facebook Making You Lonely?
Facebook Can Tell You If A Person Is Worth Hiring
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)K/R
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)I spoke to an offline DU acquaintance and he said that discussion boards like DU were obsolete because people don't want to communicate with a mass of people they don't know and can't be entirely sure they agree with. I.e. people don't want to communicate outside their own social circle, so they don't make any friends who are not like them. We are bowling alone.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)...establishing a FB group.
I've done this with DU members, with daily exchanges among our 26 (or more) members.
It's a private group so I can't expand on the details, but it is more immediate.
So is Twitter. Have we tried Twitter?
Keep in mind, FaceBook members often don't know how to keep two identities, Family and Political, same with Twitter, but FaceBook seems to elicit greater enrollment and participation.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Last edited Tue Nov 27, 2012, 06:15 PM - Edit history (5)
Well... I AM on FB...
I'm not very active... for the reasons so expertly and hilariously stated by TwilightGardener... nevertheless...
I would be interested.
[font size="3"]GOD WHY DID IT[/font]
[font face="Times" color="blue"]"Anything but the butterflies.png"[/font]
[font size="3"]HAVE TO BE [/font][font size="5"]FB[/font]
Part of my issue is my reluctance to use FB for substantive discussions, which even aside from the data-mining can then be viewed by any, say, distant Republican relative that is logged on to wish me happy birthday (although I suppose one could create an alternate account). For the average sheeple who are raised to not speak out about politics since independent thought is intensely unpopular, this is not a problem for them... Admittedly there is a certain degree of publicity in posting on any blog, but not really because everything we say about politics on DU is meant to be a) public and b) pseudonymous or, if we're posting under our name, the equivalent of public comment in a public soiree, I guess. Why can't there be a model for an alternative to FB that is more like traditional online discussion boards and groups. Nevertheless, I would be interested...
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Facebook conversations are limited in a way that discussion boards like DU are not. The anonymity frees people up a bit.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,346 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)I'm only on IRL part of the time. I'm AFR (Away From Reality) at least when I'm dreaming
Lars39
(26,117 posts)Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)They do seem quite eager to share their wealth of user data with the highest bidding entities while they still have it.
But my real problem with Facebook is how it's set up... consider the fact that Facebook and Twitter pages are now both hidden from nonsubscribers, creating a subscriber-model Internet, like the days of Prodigy and Compuserve, but minus the original content and sense of community.
Social networks as they are presently set up (according to critics like the film The Social Network, explicitly to cater to the enemy, i.e. those horrible cliquish people you tried to get away from in college) are in fact anti-community... since they seem to be geared to broadcasting as much info as possible about the user while limiting social interaction to "friends" creating a shallow society of spectacle.
Lars39
(26,117 posts)I'm one of those non-existent people mentioned.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Just pointing out that AOL tried to do the same thing years ago. They called it Eternal September...
Google's trying to do the same thing too, I guess... turn the Internet into its own subscriber service
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)"Eternal September" sounds like a "pets rest" place.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)The date AOL subscribers were unleashed upon the Internet.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)new "maybe there's something wrong with you" stigma of not having an account is to make those of us who have resisted finally give in, under threat of this new form of peer pressure. I just don't want to deal with people I used to know but no longer care about and will never see again. I don't want to have to interact with, and be polite to, my husband's extended family members all the damn time--posting responses and "likes" and acting like I care if someone's cousin's niece is potty trained and likes to help mommy frost Christmas cookies. I never used to have to care about this shit, why do I have to plug into this world now?
Confusious
(8,317 posts)I mostly ignore it.
It's useful sometimes, but I got other things to do.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I would have kept in touch. The fact that I haven't? Means I really don't give a shit.
I actually do have a facebook account, but I only have 40 or so "friends". My profile, posts, etc are as locked down as FB will let me make them. Only 'friends of friends' can add me, only friends can see my activity, I block every app that pops up in my feed, and hide every 'suggested post' that shows up.
Berserker
(3,419 posts)I actually hate that shit. Some sites you click on want you to have a facebook account to even see the site. I will never sign up. Facebook can blow me.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I mainly use it to keep track of a handful of friends and relatives. It's possible I have my privacy settings so high that no one can see anything anyway, although I suppose hacking the privacy settings is easily done. I just don't like to put out anything at all about myself. If I want a friend or relative to know something, I'll email or phone them.
I don't have a smartphone either. Just a very nice, if somewhat stupid cell phone.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)I am one of the last great unwashed who is not available for commercial purposes.
If Facebook continues to lose share price, it will be all my fault.
too bad guilt does not work on psychopaths.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Entire nations of assholes are converging on your location!
Fortunately, you know who these people are,
and it's not too late to institute the master plan...
OR IS IT?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)green for victory
(591 posts)What does the data that Facebook collects after about 1 year of "membership" look like?
Austrian student takes on Facebook over privacy
In this photo taken Monday, Oct. 10, 2011, Austrian student Max Schrems holds files about his activities on his Facebook account that Facebook handed over to him, in Vienna, Austria. Schrems wasn't quite sure what information about himself Facebook would send him after he filed a request with the social networking giant to receive his personal data, as is required under European law.
It certainly wasn't the stack of 1,222 pages worth on a CD that inspired him to launch an online campaign aimed at forcing the social media behemoth to abide by European data privacy laws _ something the Palo Alto, California-based company insists it already does. Since August, some 350,000 people have visited the site, dubbed "Europe vs. Facebook," and flooded Facebook's European branch, based in Ireland, with requests for their personal data. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)
One of Schrems' main complaints with Facebook, he says, is that company retains information far longer than allowed under European law, which it most cases is limited to a few months.
"I wondered, what are they doing with my data?" Schrems said, sitting with his laptop in a Viennese coffee house. "I thought through everything that one can do with that amount of information, all the marketing that is possible."
Under European law, consumers have the right to request a record of the personal information held by a company. The law further stipulates that to retain data beyond the limit of several months, a company must have a reason to do so...(more)
http://phys.org/news/2011-10-austrian-student-facebook-privacy.html
see the exact data collected
http://www.europe-v-facebook.org/EN/Data_Pool/data_pool.html
Front page
http://www.europe-v-facebook.org/EN/en.html
Facebook is a fad anyway, it will fall as fast as it has risen. F Facecrook! Delete your account!
Raine
(30,541 posts)to take all that time. I'd rather spend my online time here in DU.
onethatcares
(16,192 posts)at my age I figure if you don't know me by now, you will never, never, never know me hmmmmmm.
and if you don't know me by now, I don't give a rats ass if you ever do.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)I access it about once a month. I don't post on it much more than once a year. Not all the info on it is accurate, the people that know me know what's real and everyone else doesn't need to know.
I don't just "Friend" anyone that I get a request from.
The best way to confound any data mining operation is to confound it with false data.
And ANY employer that wants to know my FB account gets the same reaction that asking me what church I belong to would get-NOYFB.
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)From the targeted ads I see whenever I (rarely) access it, Facebook thinks I'm a Mormon Rush Limbaugh fan and Romney supporter who follows BYU football. I don't know how they got that idea, but I don't mind if they stay confused.
kydo
(2,679 posts)Cause I do not have a facebook page, never had a myspace page either. I do design websites and have been doing so since 1996. I've post on mailing lists, message boards, irc channels, user groups, you name it I have done it expect for facebook, myspace and that linkwhatevrlog.
facebook is a huge waste of time and brains.
Phentex
(16,334 posts)I have never had facebook. I didn't think i'd have time for it and based on my sister's experience with it, i don't think i am missing anything.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)face-to-face interactions.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I could care less what the corny little people think. What is important is to stand with my fellow profound elite people and say, "I am way cooler than the filthy commoners and their Facebook and television and sugar cookies and potty training and silly little pictures". Uggh!
Personally, a lot of people I love are on FB. I do like reading that they're getting a new job, or the kids are doing well. It has allowed me to stay connected with my friends and family in a creative and comfortable way. If that means that FB sells the fact that I am an agnostic who likes Tom Petty and Ricky Gervais to someone dumb enough to pay for that bit of info...Eh, whatever!
I could care less who's on Facebook. I could care less if they've never have stepped into a Walmart or McDonald's or a stadium. If it's not your thing, it's not your thing.
All I ask is don't expect my respect if you look down on us "flyover people" because we do. Just one suggestion: Make sure to take an umbrella when you go out so you don't get water in your upturned nose.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The story was about people being considered suspicious by corporations and mainstream media and culture, simply because they don't have a Facebook account. It's not about your hallucination that, because you do have a Facebook account, somewhere some snooty intellectuals are feeling superior to you, or thinking that you are a pathetic consumerist peasant ripe for the corporate harvesting.
Wind Dancer
(3,618 posts)Great response.
pecwae
(8,021 posts)I tried to sign up not long ago just to access a niece's page. I was prompted for a phone number during the sign up. I had no idea they did that and wasn't about to give them my cell.
Are we seeing the end of actual person-to-person social interaction? It sure seems that way. Plus, I cant see the point of rushing to any social media to reveal everything about my private life. Maybe it's a form of therapy for some, but there may be a price for making your personal information readily accessible. I prefer my private life to stay that way as much as possible.
drm604
(16,230 posts)friend a few family members and close friends, and never post or subscribe to anything controversial.
Ive been very political on FaceBook and now I suddenly find myself unemployed, looking for work, and wondering how many potential employers will ask about FB. I've considered opening an alternative account with a few pictures and friends and showing them that if they ask.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Well, I did that, several years ago, out of pressure from my son who lives on the other coast.
Opened the account in the dog's name, as usual. ( the cat has too many accounts now)
and said hi to the "kid", who posted back a pic or 2.
Never saw ads, I have Ad Block because I hate ads and commercials with a serious fury.
then forgot about it for a month or 2 until I got an email from the kid, so went back to the page,
and there, all over that page, were pictures and comments of total strangers, and their likes and dislikes and pics.
Emailed the kid, told him email was all I was gonna do, he can send pics that way.
closed the account. I had used the 10 minute email address to set it up.
Have no way of knowing if the account is still open, I had heard it is really almost impossible to close one.
Still cannot figure out how I came to have a social kid, the other one is a nice normal introvert who hates the telephone like his Momma.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,017 posts)I don't hate Facebook, I just never found it attractive social media. I am hearing some apathy from users lately, I don't know that it's hate so much a a bit of burnout. It seems to be going strong in general though.
But I've made up my mind. If I ever find myself in need of a personal page like that I'm going to MySpace. That'll show them.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)What's Old is New Again? Hipsters?
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Solly Mack
(90,790 posts)spanone
(135,895 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I woke up this morning feeling kind of gory
Like the cockroach fellow in that Kafka story
My family now shuns me, my friends all abhor me
My girlfriend told me, "Go away,
You're starting to bore me.
(Chorus)
'Cause you're not on Facebook
No, you're not on Facebook
Oh, you're not on Facebook
And you're not nobody if you're not on Facebook"
I sent out my resume a-looking for a job
'Cause despite what Mittens Romney thinks, I'm not a lazy slob
The interviewer told me, "Your c.v. is not auspicious.
In fact, I got to tell you, son
It's downright suspicious"
(Chorus)
'Cause you're not on Facebook
No, you're not on Facebook
Oh, you're not on Facebook
And there's something 'funny' if you're not on Facebook"
I heard some bubbleheads talking on the tube last night
Saying, "If you're not on Facebook, then something isn't right.
Just look at Andre Brevik, he's not a Facebook fan
And neither is the Unabomber,
Nor is the Son of Sam
Oh, no, they're not on Facebook
No, they're not on Facebook
And if you're not on Facebook
Well, you may be psychopathic if you're not on Facebook"
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Nice!
Romulox
(25,960 posts)section on any article he publishes on Slate. Generally they are full of venom, irrespective of topic. One has to wonder who exactly his fan base consists of...
demokatgurrl
(3,931 posts)Of being a Luddite and an introvert who just wants to be left alone by most people. I abhor the total disregard of privacy an individuality that is fostered and promoted by most of social media and would not be caught dead on Facebook. Well maybe dead, as some well-meaning relative will probably post my death announcement there.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I have an unused myspace and google+ account I never use though.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)I've got DU for that.
dawg
(10,624 posts)I don't have a Facebook account. And, less face it, I *am* kind of suspicious.
reflection
(6,286 posts)I was going to read it all, but I need to be out mass murdering. Bookmarking for later if I don't get caught. Wish me luck.
GiaGiovanni
(1,247 posts)So they scare you into providing your data to them, free of charge (via Facebook), by telling you that everyone will think you're a criminal if you don't.
Nice business model there, Forbes.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)I don't find a significant fraction of sites begging for a 'like' deserving of one. Now, if they had a "loathe intensely" button...
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)....I guess that makes me a criminal, right?
What a crock.
lastlib
(23,315 posts)Call me Rebel. Rebel With A Cause.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,346 posts)One of her requirements is you are on social media. She rattled off a few names and one of them was FaceBook.
I guess that made sense to me. She needs a way to verify, absent credit checks, if you are a real person.
She seems to be very picky. She won't rent to you if you are here to see the Bears play.
I guess I'm happy she is picky and taking SOME precaution. I'm just glad to be rid of her because she is a pain in the ass. I don't even mind she is in violation of the condo by-laws renting less than 30 day contracts.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)How can you not be a real person? I don't get it.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,346 posts)..... they can clean you out - furniture and all.
IIRC, she also mentioned Linked In as a source. She also rents on a By-owner corporate housing site.
Everything she is doing is against the condo by laws so it would probably start a shit storm if she rented to a bunch of football fans looking for a weekend party pad.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Much of our affordable housing stock has been converted into condominiums, which are less accessible to renters even at the same price -- despite the fact that renting often costs more, condo restrictions are often used to exclude certain populations from a community, like in the days of covenant restrictions. So when a community that has restrictions loses its value, rather than allowing the units to float with the market, the existing residents get really paranoid about trying to prop up the price -- which only makes sense because making it a condo gives them an economic incentive to make the units they are living in less affordable, not more.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,346 posts)We just require a more than 30 day lease - not a day-to-day or week-to-week rental like a hotel.
We also require the board review the lease contract to verify other owners rights are protected.
She has done neither. But we are very laid back and I/we respect other people's property ownership rights so we don't make a big deal out of it.
The ironic thing is this is the kind of neighbor (the only one we have like this out of 6) who waives the condo by-laws around when she has a complaint. I could write a ten page post on this woman and her bullshit.
That said, I can understand the restriction some associations have on renters. For one, too many renters affects the ability to find mortgage financing for the other units. Having a "hotel unit" operated out of the building would absolutely KILL conventional financing prospects (I'm in the mtg. business). Two, and we have unfortunately had some experience with this, some renters just don't give a fuck about the other neighbors and/or common elements. It's sad but true. Three, landlords tend to be a lot more stingy about improvements and or up-keep when it comes time to vote for improvements.
We had some renters a few years ago - loud music, yelling in the hallways at 3am, pissing off the back deck and verbally abusing one of the other owners. They had a weekend blowout with people in and out all weekend - someone stole my neighbors water bottles and rolled them down the street for fun. They admitted it. Someone else walked off with our brand new yard furniture cushions. We couldn't do anything to them as their contract was with their landlord. We finally had to start fining the owner (first time ever).
I have some friends that bought in to a larger 30 or 40 plus development mid-rise. Unbeknown to them, a lot of the units were retained and rented by the real estate company that marketed/sold the project and his employees/friends. They've had nothing but trouble with vandalism in the hallways, noise and all the other bullshit that comes with apartment living. Only now THEY are responsible for sharing repair costs. Not only that, the absentee landlords NEVER vote for any repair or improvement projects. They couldn't even hire an engineer to assess the failing foundation so they could go after the developer while the building was still under warranty. Most of the landlords are behind on assessments probably because they bought with no money down and are now in trouble.
Condo associations can turn to shit in a hurry and fuck everyone else over. As a mortgage Loan Officer, I used to SCOFF at any idea a condo was a higher risk for the lender when we were assessed higher lending fees for the "supposed" risk. Now I know different.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)left on green only
(1,484 posts)....and I really don't shive a git what stink'in society thinks about that. I mean, talk about Big Brother. You Face Palm people fell right in to the slave regime, and you did so voluntarily of your own accord.
You crave the support of whatever your "friends" think, and there isn't a thing about you that every person on this planet doesn't know. And you gave all of that up while making some total nerd named Zukerdude one of the most wealthy people on the planet.
Your stoolie "profile" is linked to your hard drive, your telephone number, your credit report, your job information, your resume, your social life, your religious beliefs (or non beliefs) and the list goes on and on.
Remember the droids sitting in the theater and listening to the words of Big Brother from the Apple ad of not so long ago?
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Norman Jeter replies:
To refer to facebook as an essential part of Life is really kind of sad. Yes, it is a large part of many peoples lives. Guess what though, it doesnt need to be! it wasnt an essential part of anyones life pre-myspace, if you wanted to see what your friends were up to, youd call them up and theyd call up other friends and they would call up others and you would all meet up somewhere and hang out and
SOME OF THIS:
INTERACT PHYSICALLY with one another.
Also pointing out the fact that you are coming from the point of view of a 19yo is about as pointless as anything. You were born into technology. You are practically Borg. You have no history of life BEFORE the internet. Only Vague memories of phones with cords on them and Cellular phones you could kill a horse with. This is coming from a 35yo Network Administrator, who, btw, does have a facebook page but thinks updating my status every 15minutes is just plain retarded. I have managed to reconnect with a few friends from my past, but mostly I use it for the fact that it has a single signon function for many pages that I visit regularly. I, in fact, have NEVER updated a status on my Facebrik page.. even once.
Simply put, pull your head out of the facebook cloud and actually go an interact with people! soanso is now doing something retarded! is not interaction.. Try Shaking someones hand, or talking to them without using your thumbs. you may find it pretty rewarding!
----------
SOME OF THAT:
Lao Tsu writes:
I do believe youre one of the sanest people, Ive encountered on the net.
Thank you for seeing this stuff in context of reality, not in context of internet hype.
Leaving FB isnt a cry for help, its a choice to use time better and lose petty schoolyard, drama queens and stalkers.
The funny thing is the increased social acceptability of very creepy behaviour by people and companies on social networks.
Despite all the additional political correctness in the world, the lack of social correctness and sociopathic behaviour of people on the web is amazing .not trolls, ordinary people.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)This is parodic satire, but it may be kind of true in a way.
I have never for a nanosecond considered joining Facebook. So many of my friends say "You should join Facebook!"
NFW.
And I don't need to volunteer info to my "file". If they want info, I'm going to at least make them work for it.
I am a huge privacy advocate, and am of the opinion that credit checks should be illegal. Businesses and government have way too much legal license to snoop into our personal affairs, and I resent it. I was livid when the Reagan crowd passed the employee drug testing bill.
Before I die, I hope to see it become a serious criminal offense for businesses to gather any information on private citizens.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)i had an account several years ago, but increasingly felt my privacy being eroded, so i dropped it and haven't looked back. i do have a twitter account to follow my youngest son, but it's under an anonymous name.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)everyone knows Nikes are awesome, if you don't have them there's something wrong with you.
Tikki
(14,560 posts)would that make you suspicious of me?
Silly person...tons and tons of people don't do online socializing.
Tikki