General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm sorry but the new Obama Presidential Center is one ugly building.
I don't know who designed it. I have a home nearby and see it almost every day. My neighbors are shaking their heads.
Ocelot II
(115,894 posts)So far it's butt-ugly, though.
highplainsdem
(49,044 posts)Ocelot II
(115,894 posts)I'm glad I don't have to look at it.
?q=75&w=3200&fm=webp
highplainsdem
(49,044 posts)That would IMO require lots of glass and soaring lines.
Captain Zero
(6,836 posts)They always leak.
Seems like they heard the concerns about taking up park space, so they went up with it, but I keep expecting some Frenchman to appear at the top and hurl insults and taunts at those below.
TxGuitar
(4,211 posts)And your father smelt of elderberries!"
ariadne0614
(1,737 posts)Strength, security, benevolence, and vision. It looks solid, like Obama.
ShazzieB
(16,554 posts)It's not a style of architecture I would choose myself, but it's far from a monstrosity!
There's no pleasing some folks.
Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)Silent Type
(3,005 posts)electric_blue68
(14,956 posts)highplainsdem
(49,044 posts)Redleg
(5,857 posts)Most of the original buildings from the late 60s and early 70s are neo-brutalist style. I have to say though that the university has done a nice job with the placement of trees and green areas to soften the effect.
Mossfern
(2,570 posts)It's a blend of primitive and modern style.
I was just wonder if people are supposed to be able to read that upper left section, or if they're just random letters.
harumph
(1,917 posts)The prospective image you link to makes it seem like it'll be covered with light colored stone veneer and then there's the lettering.
I think it'll grow on people - YMMV.
bigtree
(86,008 posts)...it's tidy and trim, with a look of a arty vase.
I suspect folks will get used to it.
Rebl2
(13,572 posts)better. At least it doesnt look like slabs of concrete.
whathehell
(29,096 posts)It's a bit unusual looking, but hardly horrendous, imo.
looks like a bomb shelter. I hope they do something more to it than just concrete or whatever it is.
rpannier
(24,341 posts)Hopefully they have something less stark planned
riversedge
(70,346 posts)ActRaiser
(36 posts)I love futuristic architecture, but that thing looks like a Minecraft house made by a 7 year old.
Think. Again.
(8,515 posts)...local resistance to the building claiming public park space when it was first proposed, am I right about that? And is the community more comfortable with that situation now?
former9thward
(32,097 posts)There are not many parks on the south side and this is taking space in one of the biggest ones -- Jackson park. The Friends of the Parks organization has filed suits but so far none have gotten anywhere.
yardwork
(61,715 posts)Once the decision was made to site it in Chicago, it had to be vertical.
sheshe2
(83,948 posts)Some of that resistance might have something to do with that 'uppity black man' having been President. Just a thought.
Me, I like it. It's built for the future, our kids future.
lindysalsagal
(20,747 posts)maxsolomon
(33,431 posts)It's in the historically black South Side of the Midwest's most Liberal city.
dweller
(23,682 posts)chowder66
(9,087 posts)I think it's kind of cool.
https://www.obama.org/stories/opc-2019/
Hard to believe how many comment without first Googling what the finished building will look like.
chowder66
(9,087 posts)Not everyone will like it. I mentioned below to another poster that it reminds me of an ancient monolith which I find to be pretty darn cool.
buildings are different in person.
chowder66
(9,087 posts)I just try to stay away from the mean ones. : )
Cha
(297,788 posts)It is Cool.
chowder66
(9,087 posts)chowder66
(9,087 posts)Voltaire2
(13,213 posts)The finished design looks quite good to me, also I'm not convinced this is actually a 'brutalist' style:
chowder66
(9,087 posts)Voltaire2
(13,213 posts)chowder66
(9,087 posts)really any kind of ancient monolith with a sculpture like feel.
The more I look at the more I find it fascinating.
CrispyQ
(36,539 posts)It's kind of weird, like a robot head.
obamanut2012
(26,158 posts)Hekate
(90,858 posts)Now that I have spent some time at the link you provided us, it seems a perfect plan and worthy of Michelle and Barack Obamas vision.
Why do people have to be so reflexively cranky? I dont get it.
brooklynite
(94,786 posts)I've been to the architecture firm doing the building and have seen the model. What you're looking at is a part of an unfinished structure.
madaboutharry
(40,231 posts)I think it is hideous. It looks like a water treatment plant.
Rebl2
(13,572 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,041 posts)A lot.
If it's anything like the rendering, it should be pretty impressive.
Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)tavernier
(12,410 posts)But its different. It might be pretty interesting once the eye gets used to it. Frankly Im sick of all those glass towers that now dominate the major cities. Big yawn. Its kind of soothing and pleasant when the eye travels to the old, classic architecture in between a sea of tall glass toothpick skyscrapers.
enid602
(8,659 posts) The Museum buildings design embodies the idea of ascensionof a movement upward from the grassroots. Its form is inspired by the idea of four hands coming together; a recognition that many hands shape a place. Inside, exhibits will explore the fullness of the American storyfrom the promise of our founding documents to the movements that challenged us to live up to them.
Bayard
(22,179 posts)Nope. Don't see it.
highplainsdem
(49,044 posts)True Dough
(17,337 posts)are all inside pants pockets!
4D chess!
HUAJIAO
(2,405 posts)Silent Type
(3,005 posts)that will survive like pyramids for thousands of years. Not super excited by it, but accept Obamas vision for the site.
Hekate
(90,858 posts)Polybius
(15,507 posts)I like it.
Hekate
(90,858 posts)as the sun crosses it during the day (partly why Im so fond of the Getty Villa museum a very different kind of building, but the travertine marble changes with the light of the sun throughout the day) . Im sure the words on the corner of the building will be meaningful as well.
Silent Type
(3,005 posts)of something to come like the Obamas (Prez and FLOTUS) vision of peace/future in 35 words.
That might make a huge difference in that building.
electric_blue68
(14,956 posts)that's interesting. 👍
I suppose I'll get used to it. 🙂
As in I 've never gotten to Chicago, I wasn't going visit it until Obama's Library was/is finished. 👍
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,102 posts)jimfields33
(16,010 posts)But like some say, maybe it will be changed.
Hekate
(90,858 posts)A large square panel lower left. And the words on the upper left corner have plenty of air space behind them, seemingly, so I would not think that light is being excluded there. In addition the long low portion of the building on the right seems to be supplied with large glass windows and doors.
I think itll have natural light when the sun is out.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,102 posts)Hekate
(90,858 posts)Celerity
(43,584 posts)BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,102 posts)electric_blue68
(14,956 posts)I didn't realize what I thought was a lattice are words! Like it's a two sided corner.
If the ?stone, or concrete work is that textured as smaller slabs that's kind of interesting, catches the light differently. I thought but was a smooth surface.
LeftInTX
(25,601 posts)sprinkleeninow
(20,267 posts)GenThePerservering
(1,840 posts)its got an ancient vibe to it.
Too bad about the sacrifice of park space, though - we need as much of that as we can get (everywhere).
dweller
(23,682 posts)Of the artists renderings has it surrounded by a vast park and natural surroundings
✌🏻
flying rabbit
(4,644 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,504 posts)I do wonder about the lack of windows however.
rsdsharp
(9,213 posts)jalan48
(13,900 posts)elleng
(131,191 posts)In/near Hyde Park? I lived there, for about 10 years; pleasant.
Does look rather 'blah,' at the moment.
former9thward
(32,097 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,478 posts)LeftInTX
(25,601 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,505 posts)Theres recency bias on display every day here.
Voltaire2
(13,213 posts)People can have opinions on buildings that are different from their opinions about the person connected to the building.
Emile
(23,015 posts)of an aircraft carrier.
sheshe2
(83,948 posts)He was far before his time.
I like the finished design and all of the parks and trails. It is built for today and for future generations.
Hekate
(90,858 posts)sheshe2
(83,948 posts)Built to last for many lifetimes. They were built on a lot of blood sweat and tears, by slaves. Pretty much speaks volumes, to me at least, why it was designed this way.
This is on the South side of Chicago where he worked as a community organizer.
Thanks Hekate.
ornotna
(10,807 posts)Based on the rendering I like it.
LeftInTX
(25,601 posts)Polly Hennessey
(6,810 posts)Red Mountain
(1,737 posts)would make a great episode set.
yorkster
(1,509 posts)Think it has a sculptural quality. And the stone will look warmer in light. Interesting.
cilla4progress
(24,782 posts)...
DET
(1,324 posts)The first thing that came to mind was chunky and clunky. Brutalist with pretensions. It almost looks medieval - like it should have a drawbridge and be surrounded by a moat. I would have thought that a building celebrating Obama would look more airy and aspirational.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,346 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,480 posts)NanaCat
(1,301 posts)Construction? The finished project will look nothing like that. It will be white, but will have cutaway features and a faceted exterior to reflect sunlight over the course of a day.
The design is supposed to be evocative of upraised hands together, to allude to reaching for the skies, to aspirations. It has some very strong evocations of African art, as well. Some of the architects' final renderings have a hint of Kenyan tribal symbolism going on when seen from a distance--which would be fitting for a half-Kenyan former President.
I remember how some people hated the Vietnam Memorial at its unveiling because it seemed so dreary and harsh, like a black wound through the earth, but it soon thereafter became one of the most beloved of all the memorials in DC because its very starkness let people imbue it with their own meaning.
Let's wait until we see the finished product with the Obama Library, and let it tell its story over time, or for us to imprint it with ours, before rendering a verdict on its design.
former9thward
(32,097 posts)The National Archives will store Obama materials.
electric_blue68
(14,956 posts)I get what the designer said about the hands.
If you look at your hand in a sideways, on edge position thumb facing you; see how the back of the hand isn't straight it tilts some what "backwards" till the knuckles, then the fingers slant forward.
That's a he shape each side of the overall building is imitating.
chowder66
(9,087 posts)And that is cool in my opinion.
hatrack
(59,593 posts)edhopper
(33,638 posts)?1560785563
former9thward
(32,097 posts)They are not there now and trees that were there have been cut down for the construction.
edhopper
(33,638 posts)of what it will look like.
former9thward
(32,097 posts)But those take generations. Also they were going to use marble but switched to granite because of Chicago weather. Granite has no reflection and is terrible to look at.
riversedge
(70,346 posts)yardwork
(61,715 posts)Hekate
(90,858 posts)Now, I would like to visit it when completed, roam the gardens, explore the interior. Having never been to Chicago, it would be quite an experience altogether.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,374 posts)Tommy Carcetti
(43,215 posts)I'll wait until I see the final product for my own opinion, but whatever.
The Clinton Library kind of looks like a fancy oversized trailer but it serves its purpose.
IA8IT
(5,566 posts)On April 8, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals handed down its latest opinion that consciously shielded from any judicial oversight the construction of the Obama Presidential Center in historic Jackson Park.
The opinion guts the guarantee of an 1869 grant from the Illinois legislature providing that the land encompassing Jackson Park would be held, managed and controlled by the (Park Commission) as a public park, for the recreation, health, and benefit of the public, and free to all persons forever, by making three fatal mistakes to insulate the project from all substantive review.
First, the initial creation of a 99-year use agreement for the center flatly violates the public trust doctrine, which prohibits the outright transfer of public lands to private institutions if fair value is not received in return. Transferring possession of the site required that the center has in hand the money both to build and maintain the property. The foundation had neither when it promptly cut down hundreds of mature trees in August 2021 in a project that is late and over budget.
Instead of building the center near underserved communities west of Washington Park the foundation and the city entered a sweetheart deal that delegated to the foundation the ability to pick the Jackson Park site under a 99-year lease of 19.3 acres of prime parkland for $10, an obvious giveaway of public trust lands. How? By relabeling the original lease as a use agreement to avoid judicial scrutiny. The opinion ignores that blatant subterfuge by noting that the title to the center remains with the city, even though virtually 100% of the economic benefits went to the foundation in violation of the terms of the 1869 grant.
PJMcK
(22,056 posts)The building isnt finished yet.
To judge it now would be unfair to the designers and the builders.
Lets see it when its finished
Fla Dem
(23,780 posts)Mysterian
(4,597 posts)in your own special way.
maxsolomon
(33,431 posts)I can't believe the comments on this post - or the drive-by OP.
What did you want? The Getty Villa?
RobinA
(9,898 posts)automatically like it because we like Obama? I don't think so. I can like Obama and do not like this building one bit. Looks like an abandoned industrial site. No windows, the writing is illegible at this point. It doesn't look like anything and doesn't make me want to come inside to see what it is. I just don't get it.
maxsolomon
(33,431 posts)I think DU would have preferred the Getty Villa. Or maybe Neuschwanstein Castle.
NanaCat
(1,301 posts)Final product, because it does have windows. Not a lot, but it does have them:
Besides, it's a library not a hotel or office complex. Sunlight is toxic to library materials. You do realize that...right?
RobinA
(9,898 posts)at everything I have found. I see a stone box with some writing that goes around a 90% angle away from the viewer. Kinda Pyramids meet Tower of London. Only the Tower has more windows. Yes, I'm aware that you don't want unfiltered light in a library. The Library of Congress has somehow figured it out, as well as many other libraries the world over.
maxsolomon
(33,431 posts)in addition to the obvious ones on the facade. There is also a multi-story component on a corner that looks to be another series of screened windows. They wanted to control light inside so that's a good method.
former9thward
(32,097 posts)His materials will not be stored there. The archives in D.C. has them. Because of technology, the internet, the archives now keeps presidential materials, not the former presidents. That is why it is called a Presidential Center not a Library. So much for your no windows "argument".
Also, the picture you showed was the original conception which was marble. Because of Chicago weather they have dumped the marble and switched to granite. Which cannot be made attractive.
But carry on....
Crataegus
(60 posts)I'd like to see the architects proposal.
Unfortunately this looks like a WW2 german flak tower.
maxsolomon
(33,431 posts)It's far beyond the "proposal" stage. Note: the building at the right (with the planted roof) and the one where this view is from are also part of the project.
https://chicago.curbed.com/2019/10/28/20936254/obama-presidential-center-design-changes-museum-library-map
former9thward
(32,097 posts)They dumped the marble for granite because of Chicago weather. Good luck trying to make that attractive.
maxsolomon
(33,431 posts)Do you know of one with granite?
Limestone would have been a more local choice, but maybe too pourous and a bit dull.
NanaCat
(1,301 posts)Because they're all over the internet, if one bothers to do a Google search for 'Obama library architect renderings.'
Trying to comprehend how that's so very difficult...
PufPuf23
(8,843 posts)former9thward
(32,097 posts)Maybe you should move instead?
DFW
(54,447 posts)And they should repaint over those ugly orange girders of the upper floors.
Whats that? Its not finished yet?
Oh. Thats another matter entirely.
Never mind!
mucifer
(23,576 posts)True Dough
(17,337 posts)this:
BeyondGeography
(39,386 posts)(This was part of a Conan OBrien WH Correspondents Dinner skit back in the day.)
True Dough
(17,337 posts)so they're not brothers from different mothers!
CousinIT
(9,263 posts)I think the entire Obama Presidential Center is impressive and it embodies himself, his family, his historical life and presidency and his beliefs and inspirations.
Museum buildings are often odd-looking but that building is not "The Obama Presidential Center" - it's ONLY the museum part of it. The rest is amazing!
https://www.obama.org/presidential-center/campus/
CoopersDad
(2,198 posts)Seems pretty nice at ground level, where people will be.
former9thward
(32,097 posts)When they were going to use white marble. They dumped the marble for granite because of Chicago weather.