Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's OK everyone, a memo and a video will be sent out. Stop overreacting.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) In Republican-led states across the U.S., conservative legislators are refusing to reevaluate abortion bans even as doctors and patients insist the laws exceptions are dangerously unclear, resulting in denied treatment to some pregnant women in need.
Instead, GOP leaders accuse abortion rights advocates of deliberately spreading misinformation and doctors of intentionally denying services in an effort to undercut the bans and make a political point. At the same time, however, some states are taking steps that they say will provide more clarity about when abortions can be legally performed.
In Oklahoma, the AG sent out a memo in 2022 informing prosecutors and police that doctors should have substantial leeway to provide certain abortions. Last year, the office added that patients dont have to be septic, bleeding profusely, or otherwise close to death but reiterated a past warning that doctors should be prosecuted if theres evidence they violated the law by providing an abortion when a womans life wasnt actually in danger.
https://apnews.com/article/abortion-bans-exceptions-doctors-lawmakers-7cefca4a248076268c789ea05b367f1a
Instead, GOP leaders accuse abortion rights advocates of deliberately spreading misinformation and doctors of intentionally denying services in an effort to undercut the bans and make a political point. At the same time, however, some states are taking steps that they say will provide more clarity about when abortions can be legally performed.
In Oklahoma, the AG sent out a memo in 2022 informing prosecutors and police that doctors should have substantial leeway to provide certain abortions. Last year, the office added that patients dont have to be septic, bleeding profusely, or otherwise close to death but reiterated a past warning that doctors should be prosecuted if theres evidence they violated the law by providing an abortion when a womans life wasnt actually in danger.
https://apnews.com/article/abortion-bans-exceptions-doctors-lawmakers-7cefca4a248076268c789ea05b367f1a
So relax, the same people who can't tell the difference between sugar and meth are now properly entrusted by the people who don't know anything about a woman's body to decide if a doctor should be prosecuted based on if that woman's life was actually in danger or not. Sure, you could lose your license and go to prison, but all the bases are now covered!
I'm sure everything will be fine now. So stop worrying about it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 957 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's OK everyone, a memo and a video will be sent out. Stop overreacting. (Original Post)
ck4829
Mar 12
OP
Biophilic
(3,704 posts)1. Yeah, those guidelines are going to help alot, right?
Those poor doctors. Trained to save lives, now having to worry about some cops personal "medical" decision. How do cops or prosecutors have the knowledge to even begin to judge what is life threatening or life saving. We are elevating the idiots over the professionals. What could go wrong?
ck4829
(35,094 posts)2. The very idea sounds surreal
If a jury doesnt think a womans life needed saving, then you could go to prison.
If I was on a jury and that came up, Id always vote to acquit
you know, nullification, but Ive actually been told thats not a good idea to do that, to even advocate for it, but I guess here we are.
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)3. What is necessary is as close to right as anyone can be.