Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BadgerKid

(4,553 posts)
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 11:08 AM Nov 2012

WTH is this? Senate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.

...



Looks like a 180-turn from Sen. Leahy's previous championing *for* warrants (just search DU).
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WTH is this? Senate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants (Original Post) BadgerKid Nov 2012 OP
Fucking crazy if true. Do you have a link? Autumn Nov 2012 #1
I think it's from here. hughee99 Nov 2012 #3
Yep. BadgerKid Nov 2012 #9
WTF? think Nov 2012 #2
Leahy often second-guesses himself, and can get it very wrong in the end. leveymg Nov 2012 #4
Can you share the Bill Number? n/t fredamae Nov 2012 #5
I'm not 100% sure, but I think this might be it hughee99 Nov 2012 #6
Thank you Very much! :) n/t fredamae Nov 2012 #12
Here is the list fredamae Nov 2012 #13
So now top Dems are FOR warrantless searches of your email and Google Docs? nice...... think Nov 2012 #7
What part... lastlib Nov 2012 #8
This is insane. nt naaman fletcher Nov 2012 #10
who needs the republicans leftyohiolib Nov 2012 #11
Track Senate Judiciary Hrgs/Meetings Etc fredamae Nov 2012 #14

BadgerKid

(4,553 posts)
9. Yep.
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 12:07 PM
Nov 2012

Sorry for being remiss. Got distracted from posting the link because of wiping the milk-saturated Cheerios off my keyboard.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
4. Leahy often second-guesses himself, and can get it very wrong in the end.
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 11:19 AM
Nov 2012

He's done this before several times in the run-up to the USA Patriot Act, reauthorizations and Amendments. He comes out initially expressing "grave misgivings" but in the end ends up pushing the Bill through committee and sponsoring it on the Floor.

He did this also in the aborted inquiry into Bush Administration malfeasance related to 9/11 and deception of the Commission. Leahy was initially very open to netroots input on this, even posting and responding to questions on DailyKos. But the hearing were a whitewash.

Very disappointing.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
6. I'm not 100% sure, but I think this might be it
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 11:27 AM
Nov 2012

S.1011
Latest Title: Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act of 2011
Sponsor: Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] (introduced 5/17/2011) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/17/2011 Referred to Senate committee.
Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:s.01011:

I'm not sure that the copy of the bill at this link has the changes that were being discussed in the article, though.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WTH is this? Senate bill ...