Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LastLiberal in PalmSprings

(12,603 posts)
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 10:55 AM Nov 2023

Have you noticed AG Garland no longer says Trump will be treated

like any other person? "No one is above the law," I recall were the words he used. That message got blown out of water the day the first indictment dropped.

Any normal defendant would be in jail by now. Law enforcement reports the judges, law clerk, prosecutors, etc., have received "credible threats" of violence, but even the court of appeals is cowed by the onslaught of TFG's vitriol, and won't approve a meaningful gag order for this criminal defendant.

BTW, I am hereby declaring myself as candidate for president, so I can do whatever the hell I want with no fear of consequences.

109 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Have you noticed AG Garland no longer says Trump will be treated (Original Post) LastLiberal in PalmSprings Nov 2023 OP
bullshit. Nothing has changed from his repeated statements bigtree Nov 2023 #1
Garland waited too long. Frasier Balzov Nov 2023 #2
a conviction doesn't stop Trump from assuming office bigtree Nov 2023 #5
I find myself waiting with increasing impatience to read Roger Stone's obit. calimary Nov 2023 #18
"Too much caution turns into immunity." Adam Schiff -nt CrispyQ Nov 2023 #6
rushing cases to court often results in aquittals and cases overturned on appeal bigtree Nov 2023 #9
My sweet-self? CrispyQ Nov 2023 #21
that upset you? bigtree Nov 2023 #52
Post removed Post removed Nov 2023 #67
1/6/2021 (coup attempt) to 11/18/2022 (Jack Smith brought in) 23 months. Hotler Nov 2023 #8
mentioning 'the Biden administration' as a catalyst to charges bigtree Nov 2023 #13
Why the dig at the Biden adm????? edisdead Nov 2023 #107
NO. MorbidButterflyTat Nov 2023 #66
Bullshit. Judges are giving Trump extraordinary special treatment. Irish_Dem Nov 2023 #31
No question ... "extraordinary special treatment". Definitely politics at play in this whole thing ... more than a KPN Nov 2023 #37
what you want might not be the best course bigtree Nov 2023 #50
They are making the US judiciary and system of justice look weak. Irish_Dem Nov 2023 #98
Absolutely. While regular criminals may not be locked up for minor chouchou Nov 2023 #64
AND WITH A STRAIGHT FACE !!! uponit7771 Nov 2023 #85
Thanks, bigtree, elleng Nov 2023 #51
Nope, trump should have been in jail for at least a few days and given a very heavy fine Escurumbele Nov 2023 #82
Have you noticed that Jack Smith is now in charge of all Trump investigations? Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #3
But that would Interfere with the Requitsit BASH AG GARLAND Cha Nov 2023 #47
Right? ShazzieB Nov 2023 #81
Smith is proceeding at warp speed, gab13by13 Nov 2023 #56
Garland had a team on the field before he was appointed AG. Beastly Boy Nov 2023 #63
There was never any intention of treating Trump like any other person. lees1975 Nov 2023 #4
that's brilliant. Have the Biden WH pressure the DOJ to convict Trump bigtree Nov 2023 #7
After Trump's approach to DOJ, that's almost a laughable statement. I agree that a DOJ KPN Nov 2023 #41
you have zero proof Garland 'dragged his heels' bigtree Nov 2023 #44
There is plenty of proof, gab13by13 Nov 2023 #53
funny, you've never provided any bigtree Nov 2023 #58
PERFECT.. homegirl Nov 2023 #42
holy hell. edisdead Nov 2023 #108
Or that AG Garland is giving PO1135809 enough rope to hang himself. ProudMNDemocrat Nov 2023 #10
They have given Trump enough rope to stretch from NY to LA. Chainfire Nov 2023 #62
Heh... 2naSalit Nov 2023 #84
Have you noticed that Garland says nothing about Trump's prosecution... brooklynite Nov 2023 #11
He hasn't said anything at all about the case since the handoff to Jack Smith. Ocelot II Nov 2023 #12
As well he shouldn't. sop Nov 2023 #22
Exactly! Ocelot II Nov 2023 #23
Oh, for Pete's sake. Oopsie Daisy Nov 2023 #14
+1 NCIndie Nov 2023 #33
There are countless examples of Jan 6 defendants who mouthed off far more Major Nikon Nov 2023 #15
Shit, my black ass John Shaft Nov 2023 #16
How many times MorbidButterflyTat Nov 2023 #68
If Obama did half the stuff Trump did - my gosh. Oneironaut Nov 2023 #71
Michelle Obama agrees with you (link) uponit7771 Nov 2023 #86
Good idea and now apparently you don't have to show up for debates. Seems like a no brainer! usaf-vet Nov 2023 #17
If he isn't homegirl Nov 2023 #20
I must have missed where participating in debates was a requirement AZSkiffyGeek Nov 2023 #28
I missed it too and I suppose this is Garland's fault too? Is he supposed to arrest him if he doesn't participate? Bev54 Nov 2023 #39
If it isn't Prez Biden's fault, it's AG Garland's MorbidButterflyTat Nov 2023 #69
"Trump calls to revamp the RNC if GOP debates go ahead" sop Nov 2023 #26
You or I homegirl Nov 2023 #19
Are you saying that everyone charged with possession of classified documents is jailed pending trial? onenote Nov 2023 #40
How many times does he have to say it? milestogo Nov 2023 #24
Seems like the answer for many will always be "one more time than he has". n/t CincyDem Nov 2023 #30
Ag Garland has to "say it" at least once a day EVERY DAY!! Cha Nov 2023 #55
Then he must MorbidButterflyTat Nov 2023 #72
I view complaints like this as pure nonsense, can't help but wonder if some folks are just trying to depress tritsofme Nov 2023 #25
Ding ding ding AZSkiffyGeek Nov 2023 #27
We can turn out big and be fairly and factually critical of the people we support, we're not MAGA uponit7771 Nov 2023 #88
No need...Jack's doing the talkin' (and the takin' action). n/t CincyDem Nov 2023 #29
Jailing Trump upon indictment would cross a lot of lines NCIndie Nov 2023 #32
I agree, the lines of equal justice for all would apply to the rich and powerful too. Right now it doesn't, anyone else uponit7771 Nov 2023 #89
Inaction? NCIndie Nov 2023 #93
"Jailing political rivals is what third world despots do" ... "... when they commit no crimes". There, fixed it for you uponit7771 Nov 2023 #94
Sorry, but my post did not require your silly editing. NCIndie Nov 2023 #95
There are literally people in this thread who've been jailed for less than what TFG has done and no amount of ... uponit7771 Nov 2023 #96
You miss my point entirely. NCIndie Nov 2023 #97
"he's a former president" isn't a good reason after the 500th time, your point was addressed uponit7771 Nov 2023 #105
This is a bunch of malarkey. LakeArenal Nov 2023 #34
Some people just enjoy whining. It's a pastime. tritsofme Nov 2023 #35
"I whine until I win." czarjak Nov 2023 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author Oneironaut Nov 2023 #74
Facts Not In Dispute: Anyone else would've been in jail for acting like TFG does in court PERIOD end of story. To claim uponit7771 Nov 2023 #90
That's not the part that's malarkey..... LakeArenal Nov 2023 #99
the black fellow in the Ga. RICO case bigtree Nov 2023 #100
True, I said acted like that includes number of offenses to court uponit7771 Nov 2023 #104
When one says something which is then demonstrated to be false, the RockRaven Nov 2023 #36
Garland has never referred to Trump period. He does say nobody is above the law Bev54 Nov 2023 #38
70 plus recs for pure nonsense bigtree Nov 2023 #49
I have a question about the Great Merrick Garland: gab13by13 Nov 2023 #57
this is nice bigtree Nov 2023 #59
I have said many times that Garland would have made a fantastic Supreme Court justice, gab13by13 Nov 2023 #60
Not sure what point you are making here. ShazzieB Nov 2023 #80
This one has a super easy answer. Mike Lee wanted a vacancy on the critical DC Circuit for Trump to fill. tritsofme Nov 2023 #65
Agree. MorbidButterflyTat Nov 2023 #73
Yup, he was proven wrong, wasn't he. IMO republianmushroom Nov 2023 #43
Nope, only in the imagination of folks who either love to whine, or make a living off of it. tritsofme Nov 2023 #45
And that is your opinion. republianmushroom Nov 2023 #46
So people are imagining they were sent to jail for 1/10th of what Benedict Donald has done?! REALLY?! That's some cope uponit7771 Nov 2023 #91
Nonsense. Everyone who goes to trial can disobey the judges orders and ignore gag rules Autumn Nov 2023 #48
wondering 90-percent Nov 2023 #61
Trump is taking a gigantic shit on the judicial system, just like he always did before. Oneironaut Nov 2023 #70
He got impeached. TWICE. ShazzieB Nov 2023 #78
The Justice Dept Joinfortmill Nov 2023 #75
I am beyond being impatient waiting for justice. Patton French Nov 2023 #76
Have you noticed Garland has not said much about Trump since 8/11/23 live love laugh Nov 2023 #77
He turned the whole thing over to Jack Smith and gave him the authority to act autonomously. ShazzieB Nov 2023 #79
That was my point to the OP. live love laugh Nov 2023 #109
They treat him different because he is a past President. pwb Nov 2023 #83
Michelle Obama agrees with you (link) uponit7771 Nov 2023 #87
***MICHELLE OBAMA AGREES WITH YOU!!!**** uponit7771 Nov 2023 #92
Careful, you may suppress the vote by posting the truth. gab13by13 Nov 2023 #102
"The way I see it, not holding Trump accountable will suppress the vote." Same I'm just slightly more optimistic in ... uponit7771 Nov 2023 #103
Trump is definitely being treated differently. One hopes the end results are the same as for anyone. Freethinker65 Nov 2023 #101
That has been bullshit from the start, anyone else doc03 Nov 2023 #106

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
1. bullshit. Nothing has changed from his repeated statements
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:04 AM
Nov 2023

...that Trump isn't above the law.

Witness the multiple felony charges brought by the SC GARLAND appointed ON HIS OWN initiative.

There's something called due process of law which many folks looking on haven't been able to discern from the television court cases they rely on to make these ridiculous judgments.

If courts or juries decide that Trump deserves to be jailed based on the completion of a trial or some plea from the defendant, that's when it will happen. Not because someone on the internet stamps their feet and demands it.

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
5. a conviction doesn't stop Trump from assuming office
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:40 AM
Nov 2023

...so it's a bullshit argument that rushing these cases to court earlier would have prevented anything, much less a Trump candidacy.

It's interesting that critics are still pretending convictions are a slam-dunk because of something read or heard in the news, forgetting that there is a process of law in which defendants have myriad rights and opportunities to delay or divert proceedings, and ignoring the complicated process unfolding right before them.

This isn't tiddlywinks. Garland and Smith have done what's possible in moving the prosecutions forward, recognizing that it is going to take an overwhelming amount of evidence which isn't always admissible in court, or just laying out in the open for prosecutors to use effectively in a trial.

That's why the beginning of this prosecution involved removing the assumed privileges the Trump WH officials and attorneys have used to shield their testimony from the courts. That's something Garland did to perfection.

___Thomas Windom, a little-known federal prosecutor who is presently representing the Special Counsel position before Judge Chutkan on the Trump protective order and more, is the man Deputy AG Lisa Monaco tasked in Fall 2021 to oversee key elements of the Justice Department’s investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election results - one of the first indications that Trump and his associates were under DOJ investigation.

NYT:

"It (was) Mr. Windom, working under the close supervision of Garland’s top aides, who is executing the department’s time-tested, if slow-moving, strategy of working from the periphery of the events inward..."

"He ha(d) been leading investigators who have been methodically seeking information about the roles played by some of Mr. Trump’s top advisers, including Rudolph W. Giuliani, Jenna Ellis and John Eastman, with a mandate to go as high up the chain of command as evidence warrants."

"Mr. Windom’s second objective — mirroring one focus of the Jan. 6 committee — is a widening investigation into the group of lawyers close to Mr. Trump who helped to devise and promote the plan to create alternate slates of electors."


...it was Merrick Garland, not Jack Smith, who oversaw the arrests of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys leaders who were outlined in detail in the January 6th Committee's final report as linked to the Trump White House through the former president's close confidant and frequent WH visitor, Roger Stone, who the report describes as having a longstanding, close relationship several of the already convicted insurrectionist leaders.

For some stupid reason, one of the complaints about AG Garland was that he was only arresting 'foot soldiers.' You don't get a Jan. 6 indictment of Trump for the PB and Oath Keepers' rioting without the sedition charges GARLAND successfully prosecuted against both Proud Boys and Oath Keepers leaders. Weird trying to separate those historic convictions from any ultimate charges Trump gets hit with, as so many of his critics have, just to (falsely) say Garland was doing nothing.

Those 'foot soldiers' who were arrested, charged, and convicted of crimes ranging from blocking government proceedings to committing seditious acts are essential to making the case against Trump - at least that's what the Jan. 6 committee took pains to point out.

There were 1,059 arrests related to Jan 6th, and DOJ says they’re still looking for 323 additional people to charge. But, most important in those arrests and convictions, DOJ has indicted and convicted the top commanders of those foot soldiers, with direct ties to Trump's top aides, on sedition charges.

The sedition charge, which is rarely used and harks back to the Union’s efforts to protect the federal government against secessionist rebels during the Civil War, was also used in two separate trials against nine members of another far-right group, the Oath Keepers militia. Six of those defendants — including Stewart Rhodes, the organization’s founder and leader — were convicted of sedition; each of the others was found guilty of different serious felonies.

As the verdicts were read in the fourth-floor courtroom, Mr. Tarrio, Mr. Pezzola and the other defendants — Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs and Zachary Rehl — remained steely. With the exception of Mr. Pezzola, the men were also found guilty of conspiring to obstruct the certification of the election, which took place at the Capitol on Jan. 6. All five defendants were convicted of a third conspiracy count as well, which accused them of interfering with the duties of members of Congress that day.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/04/us/politics/jan-6-proud-boys-sedition.html


Indictments weren't handed down for the “Watergate Seven,” including John Mitchell, H.R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, until March 1, 1974, almost two years after the burglars were charged. Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are the equivalent measure of those burglars, or 'foot soldiers.'

So, the question here is, how do you get to an indictment of Trump for his ties to the Capitol riot leaders without the efforts of Merrick Garland in rounding up and convicting these WH connected insurrectionists?

Aside from that important peg in the board, what would be the actual value in arriving in court ready to prosecute Trump for a conspiracy that hadn't yet been fully prosecuted? Hell, even now Stewart Rhodes is stretching his conviction out into an appeal. What Garland's team spent their time on is absolutely integral to any conspiracy prosecution of Trump for the attempt to overthrow democracy that day.

And, they were completists. They did their job diligently, and with historic successes in the sedition convictions: something Trump should be expected to face in his own prosecution.

See for yourself what the Jan. 6 committee expected in the way of prosecutorial accountability. Ask yourself, who delivered that?

...excerpts from the Jan. 6 Committee Final Report:

Ali Alexander, a rightwing provocateur who has worked closely with Roger Stone, quickly organized a new “Stop the Steal” campaign. On November 10, 2020, Alexander established “Stop the Steal” as an entity incorporated in Alabama.Alexander added a bank account and various websites.

One of Alexander’s key allies in the “Stop the Steal” movement was Alex Jones. Prior to January 6th, Jones riled up crowds both in-person and online with incendiary rhetoric about the election. Jones’ InfoWars was also a platform for others in the election-denial coalition. For instance, both Enrique Tarrio and Stewart Rhodes made multiple appearances on InfoWars, including between election day 2020 and January 6, 2021.

Another frequent guest on InfoWars was Roger Stone — a nexus character in the “Stop the Steal” coalition. Stone recommended that then Presidential Candidate Donald Trump appear on Jones’s show in December 2015. Trump accepted the invitation and praised Jones at length during his appearance. The significance of Trump’s interview with Jones should not be underestimated. Donald Trump was a leading presidential contender at the time and would go on to win the election. His appearance with Jones normalized InfoWars, welcoming its conspiracy-minded audience into Trump’s base. Trump did not appear on InfoWars again. However, Stone continued to make regular guest appearances.

After election day 2020, Alexander Jones, and other “Stop the Steal” organizers, held rallies around the country to protest fictional claims of voter fraud. These events provided an opportunity for radicals and extremists to coalesce. The Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Three Percenters were all attendees. QAnon adherents were well-represented. So, too, were the white nationalist Groypers and their leader, Nick Fuentes.

“Stop the Steal” events and other protests throughout 2020 helped build the momentum for January 6th. The Select Committee collected data on 85 right-wing events between January 1, 2020, and January 20, 2021, which were inspired by opposition to COVID-19 lockdown measures, racial justice protests, and, later, the perceived theft of President Trump’s victory. Far-right extremists protested at or inside State capitols, or at other government buildings, in at least 68 instances. Of those, 49 occurred during the period after the election through January 6th. In the year leading up to January 6th, there were at least nine events at which far-right actors entered State capitols.At least four of these capitol incursions—in Michigan, Idaho, Arizona, and Oregon—involved identifiable individuals who later participated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Consider, for example, the protests held in Atlanta between November 18 and 21, 2020. Leaders and rank-and-file members of the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Groypers, gathered outside the State capitol and the governor’s mansion for nonstop events, including armed protests. Enrique Tarrio and Stewart Rhodes personally led contingents of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, respectively.

"... the “Stop the Steal” protests in Atlanta, Georgia, prefigured January 6th in important respects. “Stop the Steal” organizers tried to use the mob they had assembled — including extremists from the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Three Percenters and Groypers — to intimidate lawmakers and overturn the election results in Georgia, which was required to certify former Vice President Biden’s victory in the State by the end of that week. They implored their followers to “storm the capitol.” As discussed in Chapter 8, this same coalition of radicals did just that on January 6, 2021.

Other “Stop the Steal” events helped pave the way for the events of January 6th. Two rallies in Washington D.C. — on November 14 and December 12, 2020 — were critically important. Alexander’s “Stop the Steal” was not the only protest organization present at these events. Both were called “Million MAGA Marches” and drew in other rally organizers. One of these other protests was called the “Jericho March” prayer rally. Regardless, the same constellation of actors that appeared in Atlanta also incited Trump supporters in Washington.

On the evening of December 11th, hundreds of Proud Boys and friends gathered in downtown Washington, DC to listen to an impromptu bullhorn speech by Tarrio and Nordean, along with Roger Stone and Shroyer. Stone implored the crowd to “fight to the bitter end.”?

The next day, as the Proud Boys marched in force on the streets, Tarrio teased in a social media post that he had a meeting in the White House. The visit, which was only a public White House tour, appears to have been facilitated by a friend, Bianca Gracia, the head of Latinos for Trump. As the rallies concluded the next day, the Proud Boys took to the streets again. Two key events occurred that evening.

First, members of the Proud Boys tore down a Black Lives Matter banner from a historically Black church in downtown Washington, DC. They filmed themselves burning it. Tarrio was eventually charged with destruction of property. He was arrested on January 4, 2021, and banned from Washington, DC, barring him from joining the group at the Capitol. As explained in Chapter 8, however, Tarrio’s arrest did not stop him from conspiring with his men on January 6th.

Minutes after the flag burning, a man wearing black clothes walked into a crowd of Proud Boys. Assuming he was associated with Antifa, they began pushing and harassing him, and he drew a knife in response. In the ensuing melee, four Proud Boys suffered stab wounds, including Bertino, a confidant to Tarrio. Bertino’s wounds were severe and life-threatening, preventing him from joining the group on January 6th.

The Proud Boys began to reorient and formalize their operations to focus on January 6th after President Trump’s December 19th tweet. Inspired, in part, by Bertino’s stabbing, the Proud Boys centered their new hierarchy in group chats that used terms such as “Ministry of Self Defense” (MOSD). However, the words “Self Defense” were misleading: Enrique Tarrio and others would soon go on the offense. And the MOSD served as their organizational scaffolding for the January 6, 2021, attack.

On December 20, 2020, Tarrio established a “national rally planning committee” and created an encrypted MOSD chat to organize their activities. Tarrio added Proud Boys leaders from across the country, including several who played lead roles in the violence on January 6th. In the ensuing weeks, the Proud Boys traded equipment recommendations, shared maps marked with law enforcement positions, and established command and control structures. A separate encrypted chat, named “Boots on the Ground,” was established for foot soldiers who would be in Washington, DC on January 6th.

The Proud Boys’ planning for January 6th was a significant step in the group’s evolution. Previously, they were loosely organized. The MOSD was created to enforce a “top down structure” with a defined leadership.Tarrio stressed the command structure by telling members that they needed to “fit in, or fuck off.”?

...As explained above, a constellation of far-right characters came together in late 2020 as part of the “Stop the Steal” cause. Among them was Roger Stone, a right-wing political operative whose career as a self-trumpeted dirty trickster stretched back decades. Stone is arguably President Trump’s oldest political advisor. For example, he worked for Donald Trump’s independent presidential bid during the 2000 campaign. In addition to his political connections, Stone cultivated relationships with far-right extremists, including the two groups charged with seditious conspiracy: the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys.

The Select Committee found that at least seven members of the Oath Keepers provided security for Stone, or were seen with him, in the weeks immediately preceding the attack on the U.S. Capitol. Text messages released by Edward Vallejo, an Oath Keeper charged with seditious conspiracy and other crimes, show that Stewart Rhodes and Kelly Meggs discussed providing security for Stone. Some of these Oath Keepers guarded Stone during an event at Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC on the night of January 5th. Stone was also flanked by Oath Keepers outside of the Willard Hotel on the morning of January 6th. One of the Oath Keepers who provided security for Stone was Joshua James, who pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy, obstruction of Congress and other charges in March 2022. James was also reportedly seen in Stone’s hotel room at the Willard hours before the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Stone has a longstanding, close relationship with the Proud Boys. Stone has taken the Proud Boys oath and repeatedly defended the group. Danish documentarians filmed him working with Proud Boys for years. In one scene, filmed in 2019, Stone warmly greets Joe Biggs, a Proud Boys leader central to the Capitol violence. Stone says of Biggs: “My guy, right here.”? In a 2019 court case, Stone identified Enrique Tarrio as one of his volunteers, explaining that Tarrio had access to his phone and could post to Stone’s Instagram account from it.

As mentioned above, Stone, Tarrio and another Proud Boy leader, Ethan Nordean, addressed an impromptu rally in Washington, DC on the night of December 11, 2020. Owen Shroyer, an InfoWars host, was also with them. “We will fight to the bitter end for an honest count of the 2020 election,” Stone told the crowd. “Never give up, never quit, never surrender, and fight for America!”?A few weeks later, on January 2, 2021, Tarrio led a Proud Boys protest outside of Senator Marco Rubio’s home in Florida. The Proud Boys wanted to convince Rubio to vote against certification of the vote on January 6th.Stone reportedly called into the event to speak to Tarrio’s crowd.

One way in which Stone maintained these contacts was through a Signal chat group named “F.O.S.” — or Friends of Stone. Two days after the election, Stone sent a text: “We provide information several times a day. So please monitor the F.O.S. feed so you can act in a timely fashion.”? Ali Alexander and Stone continued to coordinate about Stop the Steal strategy and events between the election and January 6th. In addition to Alexander, Stone’s “Friends” on the Signal chat included Rhodes and Tarrio.

In July 2020, President Trump granted Stone clemency after he was convicted of lying to Congress and other charges. Then, on December 23rd, President Trump pardoned Stone. Several days later, at a dinner on the evening of December 27th, Stone thanked President Trump. In a post on Parler, Stone wrote that he “thanked President Trump in person tonight for pardoning me” and also recommended to the President that he “appoint a special counsel” to stop “those who are attempting to steal the 2020 election through voter fraud.” Stone also wrote that he wanted “to ensure that Donald Trump continues as our president.” Finally, he added: “#StopTheSteal” and “#rogerstonedidnothingwrong.” The Select Committee has learned that Stone discussed the January 6th event with the President, likely at this same dinner on December 27th. The President told Stone he “was thinking of speaking.”?

The Select Committee sought to question Roger Stone about his relationships with President Trump and far-right extremists, as well as other issues. During his deposition, Stone invoked his Fifth Amendment right nearly 90 times. Stone has publicly stated that he committed no wrongdoing and that he encouraged a peaceful protest.


...who was it that dove into all of that, before and during the Jan. 6 committee hearings (which actually delayed the start of the first PB and OK court appearances) and came up with historically successful sedition convictions?

Who did all of that? You know who.

calimary

(81,608 posts)
18. I find myself waiting with increasing impatience to read Roger Stone's obit.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 12:59 PM
Nov 2023

And crack open the champagne.

Or at least some chocolate.

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
9. rushing cases to court often results in aquittals and cases overturned on appeal
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:55 AM
Nov 2023

_ Scooter Libby.

Sometimes I think that's actually the aim of some critics out in internet-land who press the DOJ to act precipitously based on news reports. Rush an incomplete prosecution into court and secure a win for the defendant on appeal or an outright aquittal.

...not your sweet-self, of course.

There are over 20 experienced prosecutors working behind Jack Smith, alone, not to mention the Justice Dept..

Positing about them like they care less about convicting than those of us on the internet is silliness and shouldn't be taken seriously.

CrispyQ

(36,567 posts)
21. My sweet-self?
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:18 PM
Nov 2023

It's apparent you're happy with how the case has been handled & plan to state your opinion over & over & over in this thread but seriously, sweet-self? You just validated everything I've thought of you in the past.

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
52. that upset you?
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:28 PM
Nov 2023

...really?

Jesus, whatever. I meant it to be the opposite of derogatory, because I thought you might think I was ragging on you personally, and not talking about critics in general.

I can't account for that. It's not a derogatory term, it's a literary one. Shakespeare, for one example...

"Thyself thy foe, to thy sweet self too cruel."

Just not a slam, at all.

Response to bigtree (Reply #52)

Hotler

(11,484 posts)
8. 1/6/2021 (coup attempt) to 11/18/2022 (Jack Smith brought in) 23 months.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:49 AM
Nov 2023

IMO. From the get go I feel that the Biden Admin. and the DOJ were nonchalant towards the crimes of the coup attempt.

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
13. mentioning 'the Biden administration' as a catalyst to charges
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 12:11 PM
Nov 2023

...is exactly what republicans are accusing this administration of perpetrating against their candidate.

Didn't happen, because this president and this administration understands than justice is properly, constitutionally, and legally metted out by the Justice Dept. and other law enforcement agencies and agents, not by the president or the WH.

Thing is, the choices Joe Biden made early in his administration are paying dividends for the nation, including his appointment of the man republicans denied a seat on the Supreme Court.

Not only was it Merrick Garland's correct and prescient decision to appoint Jack Smith, it was his efforts laying the ground work; fighting the court challenges over privilege and access; obtaining the search warrant of Maralago which has resulted in an indictment of Trump on dozens of charges; which effectively enabled this administration's DOJ to carry out their responsibilities of checks and balances.

The notion spread lately that Garland's DOJ was unconcerned, indifferent, or otherwise negligent in his duty to investigate (and prosecute) the Trump WH because of disagreements within the FBI is such a simplistic and really inane view of how the department operates.

...from the recent, otherwise gaslighting article by WaPo's Carol Leonning:

"It is not unusual for FBI agents and Justice Department prosecutors to disagree during an investigation about how aggressively to pursue witnesses or other evidence. Often, those disagreements are temporary flare-ups that are debated, decided and resolved in due course."

"The idea of closing the probe was not something that was discussed or considered by FBI leadership and would not have been approved, a senior law enforcement official said."


..the notion that DOJ was just sitting on their hands in the interim before they announced a formal investigation into Trump's activities is belied by report after report of FBI and DOJ activity behind the scenes, like this one today:

Pete Strzok @petestrzok 22h
Newly unredacted Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit information: before the search, the FBI and DOJ knew more than half (between 34 and 39 of approximately 64) of the boxes that were removed from the storage area had not been returned.

or this one:

This July 26, 2022 article by Carol D. Leonnig, the same person who claimed there wasn't attention at DOJ on the Trump WH, including the president, should give pause in accepting the claims that DOJ was negligent in the early days of Garland's time in office.

Justice Department investigators in April (2022) received phone records of key officials and aides in the Trump administration, including his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, according to two people familiar with the matter. That effort is another indicator of how expansive the Jan. 6 probe had become, well before the high-profile, televised House hearings in June and July on the subject.

The Washington Post and other news organizations have previously written that the Justice Department is examining the conduct of Eastman, Giuliani and others in Trump’s orbit. But the degree of prosecutors’ interest in Trump’s actions has not been previously reported, nor has the review of senior Trump aides’ phone records.


...or, consider this:

(@MuellerSheWrote) Before Jack Smith was appointed, Merrick Garland:

Seized John Eastman's phone
Seized Jeffrey Clark's phone
Seized Scott Perry's emails
Seized Eastman's emails
Seized Epshteyn's phone
Seized Mike Lindell's phone
Seized Mike Roman's phone
Seized Scott Perry's phone
Got Kash Patel's testimony
Appointed Windom
Appointed Cooney
Subpoenaed the fraudulent electors
Subpoenaed 7 state's election officials
Subpoenaed Sidney's PAC
Subpoenaed Rudy
Opened IG probe into Clark
Opened IG probe into DoJ response to 1/6
Negotiated subpoena for Meadows
Battled the 11th circuit for classified docs
Subpoenaed trump for classified docs
Subpoenaed trump for surveillance video
Executed a search warrant on trump
Convicted Bannon of contempt
Indicted Navarro for contempt
Subpoenaed the speakers from 1/6
Subpoenaed the organizers of 1/6
Secured seditious conspiracy convictions
Subpoenaed records for any member of congress involved in 1/6
Subpoenaed info on Jenna Ellis
Secured testimony from Mark Short
Secured testimony from Jacob Engel
Secured testimony from Philbin
Secured testimony from Cippollone
Subpoenaed info on trump's PACs
Won privilege battles for Short, Engel, and the Pats
Negotiated for Pence's subpoena
Seized the phone records of Meadows
Secured the 1/6 committee transcripts
Subpoenaed 7 secretaries of state

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1647043510544273408.html


...that's just what's in the public record. DOJ secrecy rules (correctly) prevent us from definitively knowing or saying just what they did in the early days of the investigation. The absence of that information may well be an open invitation for Garland critics to speculate the worst of his actions and intentions, but it's still bunk without that inside knowledge, which is essentially the bulk of the case, and not available in anything we read in the news.

The argument that the man who, by himself, appointed the person who deepened and accelerated the probes into the Trump WH was somehow negligent is an insult to logic.

Common sense should tell us that Merrick Garland is overseeing a smart and deliberately effective collection of investigations and prosecutions which he, himself, set in motion. If we can't acknowledge that, we're left pretending all of this prosecutorial progress before us just appeared out of thin air.

edisdead

(1,967 posts)
107. Why the dig at the Biden adm?????
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 12:35 PM
Nov 2023

WTF?

Do you even understand how the judicial branch functions?

Irish_Dem

(48,097 posts)
31. Bullshit. Judges are giving Trump extraordinary special treatment.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:36 PM
Nov 2023

Everyone knows it.
Due process my ass.

KPN

(15,679 posts)
37. No question ... "extraordinary special treatment". Definitely politics at play in this whole thing ... more than a
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:53 PM
Nov 2023

bit of caution -- extraordinary caution? -- about political consequences.

"The woman who deliberates is lost." Joseph Addison, 1713 -- better known today as "he who hesitates is lost".

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
50. what you want might not be the best course
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:24 PM
Nov 2023

...folks screaming for Trump to be jailed on contempt or bail violations, for instance, aren't judges (like Chutkan, McAfee, or Engoron) focusing on completing their trials without automatically causing diversionary issues rising from their own rulings to derail their proceedings.

Due process involves more than deepening jeopardy for defendants. I'm old enough to remember when defendant rights were important enough to my party to defend that preogative wherever it applied, especially in the case of a government prosecution, or one as politically-charged as this one.

Adherence to those principles ensures solid convictions. You can get as stern about it as you please, but due process means a lengthy process for those who can provide a sustained defense against charges.

It's sophistry to suggest that's something unusual or untoward. High profile prosecutions of high-ranking public officials are drawn out because they're almost always heavily defended.

These Trump judges, with the exception of Cannon, are all proceeding with the care we should expect if we want solid convictions.

Engoron has already ruled against Trump, and juries will determine the ultimate outcome of the other trials.

Your 'ass' has nothing to do with it.

Irish_Dem

(48,097 posts)
98. They are making the US judiciary and system of justice look weak.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 10:17 AM
Nov 2023

They look like they are protecting themselves, not the US system of law.
They refuse to protect the DA, staff, witnesses and jury.

They also give extraordinary privilege to a white powerful male.
They are afraid of him. Everyone can see that.

No one else gets this kind of special treatment.

And while my ass is none of your business, it has everything to do with what I am saying.

This discussion is not a courtroom discussion, it is the court of public opinion.
So I get to say what I want.

I come from a military family which risked their lives many times over to protect
the rights of all Americans. In fact one of them was killed in combat.

I figure it is my obligation to pay them back for their sacrifice.
To fight wrongdoing and try to make the world a tiny bit better than
when I arrived.

American judges should be hanging their heads in shame right now.
And that goes all the way up to the corrupt Supreme Court which is a junta, not a court.

chouchou

(657 posts)
64. Absolutely. While regular criminals may not be locked up for minor
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 05:39 PM
Nov 2023

...actions, the bottom line is: expensive lawyers, past fears and who you blow.
The justice system has never been fair or even-handed and never will be.
It's like the entertainment business. "You actually think we judge people/musicians/singers
..by their talent" "What planet are you from?"

Escurumbele

(3,417 posts)
82. Nope, trump should have been in jail for at least a few days and given a very heavy fine
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 08:20 AM
Nov 2023

Any other person would still be in jail, the rule of law, and the process of the law that you say must run its course (paraphrasing) has been too lenient towards the SOB, he is a thug who continues to incite violence and insult judges, clerks, and everyone he doesn't agree with.

He is a menace to everyone, including republicans who don't seem to realize it. The way dictators and mob bosses work is by removing anyone who they, through their paranoia, deem to be a threat, and even a bother to them, so those idiots who are now kissing his butt, many of them will suffer as well, they just don't seem to open their eyes enough to understand it.

The SOB should have been in jail, the gag orders should have never been given any pause, I don't know what purpose it has served besides giving the SOB an open mic to insult and threaten anyone he deemed to be an enemy. $5,000.00 and then $10,000.00 fines are a joke, one that his idiot followers pay, why not give him a fine of $100,000.00 for the first break of his gag order, followed by a $200,000.00 and from then on at increments of $300,000.00 with no limit.

Beastly Boy

(9,581 posts)
3. Have you noticed that Jack Smith is now in charge of all Trump investigations?
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:11 AM
Nov 2023

And Smith's actions speak louder than words. He is meticulously proceeding in accordance with due process of law.

Why would Garland interfere?

ShazzieB

(16,661 posts)
81. Right?
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 02:57 AM
Nov 2023

I can't believe people still want to go down this "Garland did nothing! DOJ is useless!" rabbit hole. What a ridiculous waste of time.

Trump has been indicted for multiple crimes, 91 counts, for God's sake. The DC trial is scheduled to start little over 3 months from now. Yes, it would be nice if things had happened faster, but it's not over till it's freaking over!

Some people really need to get a grip.

gab13by13

(21,508 posts)
56. Smith is proceeding at warp speed,
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:42 PM
Nov 2023

In the words of Glen Kirschner, "Smith is working a 2 minute offense, while garland didn't have a team on the field." He said that on the Stephanie Miller show.

I never asked DOJ to rush a trial, I only asked that Garland open up a Trump investigation. Garland's pyramid strategy has been a bust, no one who attacked the Capitol flipped on Trump.

Beastly Boy

(9,581 posts)
63. Garland had a team on the field before he was appointed AG.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 05:38 PM
Nov 2023

On Jan. 7, 2021, Michael Sherwin announced that he is not ruling out investigating Trump. Garland took over in Mar. '22. A year later there was no doubt that Trump has been investigated by DOJ for some time.

And here you are, 20 months later, you are still lamenting about Garland not investigating Trump. And for these 20 months, all you have been asking was that DOJ rush the trial, You still didn't get off your "time is of the essence" high horse.

BTW, Smith has been on Trump's case (and his case alone) for over a year since he took over the at least seven month old Garland investigation. Any trials yet?

lees1975

(3,943 posts)
4. There was never any intention of treating Trump like any other person.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:19 AM
Nov 2023

No matter what was said. That's for public consumption, not for what the Justice Department or the courts will do. Any other person who mouthed off, threatened court personnel and judges like he has done would be held in jail unitl their trial.

I'm not really sure there was ever any intention to charge him until public pressure following the congressional investigation pushed it. The man has committed massive crimes against the people of the United States, got away with Russian collusion and possibly treason because he was President and his corrupt attorney general wouldn't prosecute. No one batted an eye at that travesty. I'm not expecting much to come from what's piled up in the way of indictments now.

Does the administration and the Democratic party want to unite Democrats and win the election in 2024 and bring in independent voters looking for someone to follow,, ending all of the bickering over "he's too old" and "inflation, inflation, inflation"? Then put some effort into prosecuting Trump and make sure he ends his life in a federal prison where he goes before he gets the GOP nomination. Let's see Garland make something out of this. Crimes were committed against the people of the United States. He's the attorney general, he should be on our side making sure this happens and pushing it along using every stitch of his power to make sure it does, not passively standing by looking academic in the DOJ office.

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
7. that's brilliant. Have the Biden WH pressure the DOJ to convict Trump
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:48 AM
Nov 2023

...to secure his election.

Brilliant.

Why didn't they think of that? It's not like that's an abuse of power or something for the Biden WH to openly push for his political opponent to be jailed.

"...he should be on our side," is advocating WH interference into Justice Dept. investigations and prosecutions to secure a political victory for the defendant's political opponent.

That's just ludicrous.


...here's a 'normal person not being precipitously jailed for the SAME crimes Trump is charged with in Ga.'

Trump ally accused of intimidating witnesses will not be jailed, judge rules
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/21/donald-trump-harrison-floyd-bail-georgia-election

Read more, and convey what's actually occurred, not just the prosecution happening in your own head.

KPN

(15,679 posts)
41. After Trump's approach to DOJ, that's almost a laughable statement. I agree that a DOJ
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 02:05 PM
Nov 2023

that is/was not politicized is a better way compared to Trump's abuse. At the least, the Biden admin could have directed that a decision about investigating Trump and the use of a special prosecutor as the means of doing so be made within a relatively short (certainly shorter) time-frame. Did investigating, prosecuting on the ground, at or in the Capitol J6 participants investigating Trump? Indirectly, but not without significant loss of time.

Let's face it, Garland dragged his heels.

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
44. you have zero proof Garland 'dragged his heels'
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 03:48 PM
Nov 2023

...and what does it mean that, "the Biden admin could have directed," other than to suggest the 'administration' is responsible for the pursuit of justice, not the actual Justice Dept. which is in place to ensure an impartial application the laws the rest of the 'administration' is mainly in charge of enacting.

It's simply hypocrisy to expect that the Trump WH, for instance, should be removed from investigations and prosecutions, but that the Biden WH should exert their influence on the process.

I'm old enough to remember many of these same Garland critics wailing when he appointed Jack Smith that he would slow down the investigation. We now know well that his actions not only sped up the probes, but deepened and enhanced the prosecutions.

The whinging out of critics' head that something or the other should have been done (without knowing if any of it had actually BEEN done), is just obtuse and really exposes the vacuousness of these critics' Garland bashing,

The man, by himself, appointed the SC who accelerated and deepened the probes into the Trump WH

The 'Biden administration,' more specifically, the DOJ began investigating the financial crimes in the Trump WH as early as 2021 with Lisa Monaco's appointment of Tom Windom.

Start there, or you're just projecting, because it's really bogus to come on criticisms of Garland without one shred of evidence to back it up other than pointing to the time taken to make it happen.

gab13by13

(21,508 posts)
53. There is plenty of proof,
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:37 PM
Nov 2023

here is just one;

The Michigan AG, Dana Nessel, sent a criminal referral to her US Marshal. Nessel waited one year for DOJ to act and when DOJ did nothing she proceeded to do the fake elector prosecution herself. When Jack Smith took over he finally acted on Nessel's referral.

Time matters bigtree: DOJ waited 1 1/2 to 2 years to open up investigations into Trump, no one ever asked garland to rush to trial, I just wanted him to investigate.

Need more examples? I have plenty.

Time Matters, the closer a Trump trial gets to the election the better will trump's argument be for election interference. I can certainly believe that his fascist Supreme Court may very well postpone all trials until after the election.

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
58. funny, you've never provided any
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:47 PM
Nov 2023

...outside of similar non-sequitur responses.

Untruth: "DOJ waited 1 1/2 to 2 years to open up investigations into Trump."

"Michigan AG, Dana Nessel..." is just silliness.

Don't do this. It's just embarrassing.

edisdead

(1,967 posts)
108. holy hell.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 12:39 PM
Nov 2023

So do the things that we wouldn’t want anyone else doing to keep them from doing the things

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,899 posts)
10. Or that AG Garland is giving PO1135809 enough rope to hang himself.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 11:55 AM
Nov 2023

As the great Lawrence O'Donnell was quoted as saying..."Anything from here on out what Donald Trump says and does, WILL BE USED AGAINST HIM IN A COURT OF LAW."

I hold hope that Special Counsel Jack Smith has all this documented to present as evidence when the time merits. For it is he who will have the last laugh or stare.

brooklynite

(95,012 posts)
11. Have you noticed that Garland says nothing about Trump's prosecution...
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 12:00 PM
Nov 2023

...because he's handed over responsibility to Jack Smith?

sop

(10,299 posts)
22. As well he shouldn't.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:19 PM
Nov 2023

Trump has been saying the whole thing is "political persecution" from the start. That allegation will be the centerpiece of every campaign rally speech he makes in 2024. AG Garland must stay completely out of this.

Ocelot II

(116,004 posts)
23. Exactly!
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:21 PM
Nov 2023

It's Smith's case now; Garland is staying out of it, as he should. And Smith hasn't said anything about it either since the initial announcement, except what's in his court filings.

Major Nikon

(36,828 posts)
15. There are countless examples of Jan 6 defendants who mouthed off far more
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 12:39 PM
Nov 2023

...while remaining out on bail. Many even did so during court hearings.

homegirl

(1,436 posts)
20. If he isn't
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:06 PM
Nov 2023

participating in debates--he isn't a GOP candidate for POTUS in 2024. Time for the GOP to announce his none participation in the process eliminates Donald from the contest.

The GOP top people have to put on their Big Boy pants and eliminate Donald from the political stage.

Bev54

(10,093 posts)
39. I missed it too and I suppose this is Garland's fault too? Is he supposed to arrest him if he doesn't participate?
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 02:02 PM
Nov 2023

MorbidButterflyTat

(1,882 posts)
69. If it isn't Prez Biden's fault, it's AG Garland's
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 06:26 PM
Nov 2023


Slobby doesn't participate in the "debates" because he's a friggin coward.

And they're basically auditions for his VP, IMO.

sop

(10,299 posts)
26. "Trump calls to revamp the RNC if GOP debates go ahead"
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:28 PM
Nov 2023

(The Hill, 11/20/23) - "Former President Trump is calling to 'revamp' the Republican National Committee (RNC) if the group proceeds with its primary debates, which Trump has repeatedly spurned."

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4319600-trump-calls-to-revamp-the-rnc-if-gop-debates-go-ahead/

"Revamp" is obviously a threat. He'll probably start calling for violence against the RNC soon.

homegirl

(1,436 posts)
19. You or I
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:01 PM
Nov 2023

would have been in jail awaiting trial for possession of Classified, Secret and Top Secret U.S. Government documents by JANUARY 30, 2021!!!!

Put him behind bars to await trial! NOW!!!

onenote

(42,854 posts)
40. Are you saying that everyone charged with possession of classified documents is jailed pending trial?
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 02:03 PM
Nov 2023

Because I can cite several examples disproving that claim.

tritsofme

(17,444 posts)
25. I view complaints like this as pure nonsense, can't help but wonder if some folks are just trying to depress
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:24 PM
Nov 2023

Democratic turnout.

NCIndie

(556 posts)
32. Jailing Trump upon indictment would cross a lot of lines
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:40 PM
Nov 2023

He and his supporters would be justified in their howling about jailing political enemies.

uponit7771

(90,371 posts)
89. I agree, the lines of equal justice for all would apply to the rich and powerful too. Right now it doesn't, anyone else
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:15 AM
Nov 2023

... would be jailed by now, that's a fact not in dispute.

Enabling Benedict Donald's law breaking through inaction does worse to the greater US than insulting a buncha clowns.

NCIndie

(556 posts)
93. Inaction?
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:43 AM
Nov 2023

He is more than just rich. He is the former president. Jailing political rivals is what third world despots do. We have a justice system that has clearly defined paths. The “inaction” has given us four ongoing trials with nearly 100 charges.

Do you want to establish a precedent where “lock her up” is more than a catch phrase for idiots?

uponit7771

(90,371 posts)
94. "Jailing political rivals is what third world despots do" ... "... when they commit no crimes". There, fixed it for you
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:46 AM
Nov 2023

TFG has committed acts in the court that would've gotten a non former president thrown in jail by now.

He's beyond pushing the boundaries as a fact, "He's a former president" isn't a good reason to allow them to be pushed further

NCIndie

(556 posts)
95. Sorry, but my post did not require your silly editing.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:50 AM
Nov 2023

Feel free to repeat yourself endlessly, but your notions of inaction will continue to be unfounded.

uponit7771

(90,371 posts)
96. There are literally people in this thread who've been jailed for less than what TFG has done and no amount of ...
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:53 AM
Nov 2023

... posting is going to change that fact.

Facts matter and "he's a former president" is an excuse that has worn its welcome

Response to tritsofme (Reply #35)

uponit7771

(90,371 posts)
90. Facts Not In Dispute: Anyone else would've been in jail for acting like TFG does in court PERIOD end of story. To claim
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:17 AM
Nov 2023

... the opposite is text book gas lighting

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
100. the black fellow in the Ga. RICO case
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 11:37 AM
Nov 2023

...was just allowed to remain out on bail after threats recognized and acknowledged by the court.

So, just false.

RockRaven

(15,097 posts)
36. When one says something which is then demonstrated to be false, the
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:50 PM
Nov 2023

wise thing to do is STFU, not repeat the falsehood ad nauseam.

It was a counterproductive thing to make a show of saying in the first place -- because it is so obviously false.

Bev54

(10,093 posts)
38. Garland has never referred to Trump period. He does say nobody is above the law
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 01:59 PM
Nov 2023

and I don't know of any recent statements he has said any different. Much of what is happening is in the court system and not decisions to be made by Garland, you can thank the Judges. When has Garland or any AG had control over the Judges?

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
49. 70 plus recs for pure nonsense
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:02 PM
Nov 2023

...essentially lies about this Democratic AG who not only prosecuted the lion's share of the actual rioters, including SEDITION charges for the riot leaders, but appointed the man who's prosecuting Trump right now on 91 felony counts.

What a bizarro world where he doesn't get credit for his historic efforts, and critics ride him just like Trump's thugs do - all claiming to be defending or trying to advance some political aim, all the while bleating about justice being done as if it's some political cudgel for their own personal edification.

gab13by13

(21,508 posts)
57. I have a question about the Great Merrick Garland:
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:47 PM
Nov 2023

When Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, why did Utah Senator Mike Lee ask Trump to nominate Merrick Garland?

bigtree

(86,021 posts)
59. this is nice
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 04:52 PM
Nov 2023

...suggesting the Biden admin Attorney General, the man Barack Obama nominated for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court, supported unanimously by Senate Democrats, was somehow just a product of a republican suggestion to Trump?

What?

gab13by13

(21,508 posts)
60. I have said many times that Garland would have made a fantastic Supreme Court justice,
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 05:03 PM
Nov 2023

If I make a supposition I say I made a supposition, you are mischaracterizing what I asked.

Why did Mike Lee ask Trump to replace Comey with Garland? I am not sure if I know the answer to that question, I thought maybe you knew the answer?

The Great Merrick Garland can never be proven to be a member of the Federalist Society but he did moderate a dozen of their conferences. Wasn't Trump given a list that was provided by the Federalist Society for him to pick his SC nominee from?

ShazzieB

(16,661 posts)
80. Not sure what point you are making here.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 02:46 AM
Nov 2023

Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the seat that should have been Garland's. There's absolutely no reason to think he ever considered nominating Garland. Why would he? Garland was Obama's pick, and we all know Trump loathes Obama.






tritsofme

(17,444 posts)
65. This one has a super easy answer. Mike Lee wanted a vacancy on the critical DC Circuit for Trump to fill.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 05:47 PM
Nov 2023

No more complicated than that.

uponit7771

(90,371 posts)
91. So people are imagining they were sent to jail for 1/10th of what Benedict Donald has done?! REALLY?! That's some cope
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:19 AM
Nov 2023

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
48. Nonsense. Everyone who goes to trial can disobey the judges orders and ignore gag rules
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 03:59 PM
Nov 2023

that are imposed on them.

90-percent

(6,834 posts)
61. wondering
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 05:27 PM
Nov 2023

I wonder if TFG's right to yell fire in a crowded theater triggers some deranged MAGA gun lover to kill someone they identify as a PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL DEMOCRAT could result in more significant restrictions on his almost daily stochastic terrorism speeches and truth social posts?

-90% Jimmy

Oneironaut

(5,547 posts)
70. Trump is taking a gigantic shit on the judicial system, just like he always did before.
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 06:27 PM
Nov 2023

He’s done multiple things that, in a just world, would have gotten him impeached, and, thrown in jail in disgrace. Why would the excusing, minimizing, and treating him with kid gloves stop now? He’s still a big, harmless circus act, after all.

ShazzieB

(16,661 posts)
78. He got impeached. TWICE.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 02:33 AM
Nov 2023

Republicans in the Senate, except for a tiny handful, refused to vote to convict him. That's on them, and their almighty leader, AKA the Turtle.

Joinfortmill

(14,521 posts)
75. The Justice Dept
Fri Nov 24, 2023, 07:20 PM
Nov 2023

doesn't speak much at all about ongoing cases, especially the AG. Trump will be brought to justice, sooner rather than later.

ShazzieB

(16,661 posts)
79. He turned the whole thing over to Jack Smith and gave him the authority to act autonomously.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 02:38 AM
Nov 2023

It would be inappropriate for Garland to make public statements about the prosecution,of the Orange Horror after doing that, it's Smith's job now.

pwb

(11,318 posts)
83. They treat him different because he is a past President.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 08:24 AM
Nov 2023

The shittiest past President ever . And he uses it to the max. I think he has used up his privilege. Take him away .

uponit7771

(90,371 posts)
92. ***MICHELLE OBAMA AGREES WITH YOU!!!****
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 09:21 AM
Nov 2023
https://www.comicsands.com/kimmel-michelle-obama-barack-documents-2658959117.html

During an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live!, former First Lady Michelle Obama said her husband—former Democratic President Barack Obama—"would be in somebody's jail" if he'd stolen classified documents from the White House.

gab13by13

(21,508 posts)
102. Careful, you may suppress the vote by posting the truth.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 12:09 PM
Nov 2023

The way I see it, not holding Trump accountable will suppress the vote.

Right now my faith lies with judge Chutkan, she appears rock solid in getting Trump to trial before the election.

A lot of people do not understand Trump's strategy, calling him a moron is totally missing what he is doing. Trump has no legal evidence to clear him of his many crimes, Trump needs to delay his trials as close to the election as he can, preferably for him, until after the election. If Jack Smith can bring Trump to trial in March it will be 1 day before Super Tuesday, guess what Trump will do?

Trump plans to claim election interference and appeal that right up to his fascist Supreme Court. Don't tell me that there are no legal grounds for Trump's appeal, I was told that the J6 Electoral vote count was just a symbolic procedure.

Time matters. It is a fact, born out by former prosecutors, born out by every member of the J6 committee, that Merrick Garland waited close to 2 years to start investigating Trump.

Time Matters, and I plan on voting no matter which scenario plays out, it matters nothing to my desire to vote.

uponit7771

(90,371 posts)
103. "The way I see it, not holding Trump accountable will suppress the vote." Same I'm just slightly more optimistic in ...
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 12:29 PM
Nov 2023

... thinking they're holding out putting Benedict Donald is jail till after enough MAGA endorse him and there's enough of the electorate disgusted with MAGA attitude.

MAGA is a dark force for democracy

Freethinker65

(10,116 posts)
101. Trump is definitely being treated differently. One hopes the end results are the same as for anyone.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 12:02 PM
Nov 2023

If Trump is allowed to delay indefinitely (or if he wins the election), he will not face any real consequences and will most likely ask SCOTUS to overturn any damages assessed/paid because of some unitary executive BS. If Trump wins the election, not paying for his former crimes will seem quaint. He will be fully allowed to abuse his power.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Have you noticed AG Garla...