General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums40 Engineers Worked 14-Hour Days, 7 Days A Week To Get Obama Reelected—Here Is Their Story
The team had elite and, for tech, senior talent -- by which I mean that most of them were in their 30s -- from Twitter, Google, Facebook, Craigslist, Quora, and some of Chicago's own software companies such as Orbitz and Threadless, where Reed had been CTO. But even these people, maybe *especially* these people, knew enough about technology not to trust it. "I think the Republicans fucked up in the hubris department," Reed told me. "I know we had the best technology team I've ever worked with, but we didn't know if it would work. I was incredibly confident it would work. I was betting a lot on it. We had time. We had resources. We had done what we thought would work, and it still could have broken. Something could have happened."
In fact, the day after the October 21 game day, Amazon services -- on which the whole campaign's tech presence was built -- went down. "We didn't have any downtime because we had done that scenario already," Reed said. Hurricane Sandy hit on another game day, October 29, threatening the campaign's whole East Coast infrastructure. "We created a hot backup of all our applications to US-west in preparation for US-east to go down hard," Reed said.
"We knew what to do," Reed maintained, no matter what the scenario was. "We had a runbook that said if this happens, you do this, this, and this. They did not do that with Orca."
Read more: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-the-nerds-go-marching-in/265325/
They must not have had a union contract?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I don't think the article said. I hope they were union.
Sedona
(3,769 posts)uponit7771
(90,359 posts)...fruit of fire drilling known scenarios so they don't have to make their life and anyone else life hard
If it wasn't Obama's team running things the incompetent leadership would drive a lot of people batty by allowing the obvious to be skipped.
A unionized shop would at least have standards making the latter a lot harder
patrice
(47,992 posts)cutting corners they barely know one damned thing about and then thinking their sparkling personality will save the day, or that we can just throw a bunch of people at it and they'll "make it happen", when what you really need to know is, for example in our state party, more and better uses for resources, especially human resources and that includes fine tuned things like which order of priorities, how many targets for maximum benefit, how long on each, in what sequence for most efficient effect and a whole host of contextual issues . . . .
We are a red state: Watched one of our most dedicated, most comprehensively aware, hardest working, party "old timers" burn out this cycle. Have known her for a long time. She will NOT do this again.
Funny thing, this just made me think about it, our state party appears to function similar to our occupy, which if it weren't for the shear "muscle" of a VERY VERY FEW individuals, would have done nothing but argue and connive against one another, while they waited for "the next big thing" to come along and justify our existence. In theory, that's resolvable, but we never did and I realized just now that probably exactly the sort of thing that goes on in our state Democratic party.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)There is a lot of work to do for the democratic party to start getting a cohesive message out to every American about what we stand for, as opposed to what the rightwing propaganda is SAYING we stand for, and I HOPE that the democratic party finally decides that we are going to be a force to reckon with. Hopefully, the party will use what the Obama campaign did in this past election and go forward with it.
patrice
(47,992 posts)JackN415
(924 posts)Yes, it's not about which campaign hiring better technologists. It's about technologists wanted Obama win and to defeat Romney.
It's about pro-progress.
One of my colleague's former student (a computer scientist) worked for Obama's campaign for this reason. No amount of money from Romney would hire him.
Tess49
(1,580 posts)pipewrench
(194 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)...he got the best and I'm SO glad he did! I just wish there had been more (any) women/blacks, people over 30 and/or other "minorities" on this elite tech team. But such is the nature of IT - that's not Obama's fault. It's just not a very diverse industry at its core.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)malaise
(269,157 posts)A friend sent me by email early this morning
progressoid
(49,996 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)(disclaimer: I am one of the nerdiest geeks around)
Patiod
(11,816 posts)During Bill Clinton's second campaign in 1996, I went to volunteer, and no one knew what to do with me.
I ended up inputting scheduling on our local US Congressional candidate's calendar, because I was the only one at the office who knew the program and could type fast. I could have been some sort of mole or saboteur, for all they knew, but I could type.
Other times I stuffed envelopes, but only after sitting around for hours. I spent more time sitting in the Congressional campaign manager's office bullshitting about politics than I did working.
Fast forward to 2012 -- I got a text saying "to volunteer tomorrow, text WIN". I texted "WIN" and was IMMEDIATELY provided with nearby Obama HQ locations and shifts.
Showed up (off-shift, I might add) at one of the HQs, and was signed in, trained, provided with walking lists, clipboard, pen, water and snacks, and out the door in 10 minutes. No sitting around allowed! They even said (as nicely as possible) "don't come back until the list is complete. And find us more volunteers." Everyone in the office was working on laptops. No one was sitting around bullshitting.
These people enabled a lean, mean, 2012-era GOTV machine.
phiddle
(789 posts)Could this technology be adapted to (1) generate grassroots pressure on behalf of Democratic policies, and (2) elect more Democratic House members? This would be a change from a unitary model-elect one president- to a pluralistic model. With a nod to Howard Dean's 50-state strategy, this would be a 438-Congressional District approach.
Cha
(297,574 posts)"We now know what happened. The grand technology experiment worked. So little went wrong that Trammell and Reed even had time to cook up a little pin to celebrate. It said, "YOLO," short for "You Only Live Once," with the Obama Os.
When Obama campaign chief Jim Messina signed off on hiring Reed, he told him, "Welcome to the team. Don't fuck it up." As Election Day ended and the dust settled, it was clear: Reed had not fucked it up."