Bill O'Reilly: "Romney deserved to lose"

[PennsylvaniaMatt]

http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/Fox-News-Bill-O-Reilly/2012/11/14/id/464090?promo_code=F492-1&utm_source=Test_Newsmax_Feed&utm_medium=nmwidget&utm_campaign=widgetphase1

"He ran and he hid for the last two weeks of the campaign. He actually hid. He wouldn’t come on [our show]. He wouldn’t come on other high-profile programs on television and tell people what he believed. He wouldn’t do it. He deserved to lose."

Comments?

[eissa]

1. And he wouldn't give people things

Because that's why Obama won, you know. We all got things. Except for white folks. They're not lazy like the minorities. Oh, and don't forget those "selfish" single chicks who just want their free birth control.

[WinkyDink]

5. Including the time of day to Billo! Ha!

[demhottie]

2. I think that Romney and his campaign will be the subject of psychological studies on denial

he thought that if he hid out for the last week or two, he would maintain the lead that he tricked himself into thinking that he had.


Of course I couldn't agree more that for this and many other reasons, Romney absolutely deserved to lose

[socialindependocrat]

3. The second level of grief - Anger

He likes to make very pointed statements when he can.

He probably thinks it shows that he's in control

At the end of the day, he's still a Repuke

Nothing to see here folks. Just move along....

[Auntie Bush]

4. He'll go down in the history books as how NOT to run a campaign if you want to win.

[WinkyDink]

7. We have a few of those ourselves! (McGovern, Dukakis,....)

[Liberalynn]

6. Notice with Billo it's always about who won't come on his show

I see, according to OLiely Mittens didn't loose because he was a horrible racist, mysogynistic, homophobic, asshole who had no viable plan to run the country, other than giving tax breaks to the rich, or because Obama was just the better candidate. Mittens lost because he didn't appear on the Factor or other Faux News Shows as much as they wanted him to. I get it now.

[txdemsftw]

8. He deserved to lose

for a lot more than Scum O'Reilly gives him credit for.

[bluestate10]

9. O'Reilly doesn't realize that Romney had no choice but to hide.

Romney's views and prescriptions were toxic, if Romney made them clear, he would have lost by more than 3% and 126 Electoral votes.

[msongs]

10. loser values + loser message + loser candidate = losing election nt

[Berlum]

11. Romney is just another AWOL Republican. A draft dodger like O'Reilly (R) knows that.

So why is he making shit up now? Oh, that's right, he's an overpaid republican propaganda pimp.

[Johonny]

12. I wonder what Huckabee thinks of all the FOX chickens

At least Mike stuck his neck out there to run for office. People like Bill are big on telling GOP candidates what to do post game, but no guts to run for office. I'm sure Romney will take is criticism with all the value of all Bill's deep insight to all matters Republican.

[ecstatic]

13. This might be the first time I've ever agreed with him

But that's not the only reason why Romney deserved to lose. He hates the 99%. He hates non-whites.

[PennsylvaniaMatt]

15. I know...O'Reilly has a good point though...

If he is running to be the President of the United States, and he can't even do a simple interview on a CONSERVATIVE network, what the hell makes him think he can be President!? Hell, contrast that to President Obama, who let Brian Williams following him around FOR THE ENTIRE DAY!

[Indykatie]

14. He Was Smart Enough to Know He Would lOSE By Bigger Margin Had He Really Talked About His Plans N/T

[tanyev]

16. Reality sinking in.

Ever so slowly.

[Thrill]

17. This is the same guy who was gushing over the size of Mitts crowds the last two weeks