Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVictoria's Secret apologizes for use of headdress
FLAGSTAFF, ARIZ. -- Victoria's Secret has apologized for putting a Native American-style headdress on a model for its annual fashion show, after the outfit was criticized as a display of ignorance toward tribal culture and history.
The company responded to the complaints over the weekend by saying it was sorry to have upset anyone and that it wouldn't include the outfit in the show's television broadcast next month, or in any marketing materials.
"We sincerely apologize as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone," the company said.
Headdresses historically are a symbol of respect, worn by Native American war chiefs and warriors. For many Plains tribes, for example, each feather placed on a headdress has significance and had to be earned through an act of compassion or bravery. Some modern-day Native American leaders have been gifted war bonnets in ceremonies accompanied by prayers and songs.
"When you see a Lakota chief wearing a full headdress, you know that he was a very honorable man. He was a leader. He did a lot of honorable things for his people," said Michelle Spotted Elk, a Santa Cruz, Calif., woman of mixed heritage whose husband is Lakota. "It also has religious significance. With them, there's not a division between spirituality and their leadership."
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/11/12/3913946/victorias-secret-apologizes-for.html#storylink=cpy
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1345 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Victoria's Secret apologizes for use of headdress (Original Post)
proud2BlibKansan
Nov 2012
OP
This model looks as if she is coming out of one of the death camps after WWII...
WCGreen
Nov 2012
#4
mmonk
(52,589 posts)1. Yeah, take it off.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)3. The headdress, too
mmonk
(52,589 posts)7. What headdress?
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)2. I don't see any headdress.
Oh, up there. How did I miss that?
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)4. This model looks as if she is coming out of one of the death camps after WWII...
Way too thin. How do they have the energy to walk across the stage.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)5. Didn't Cher do something similar on her and Sonny's TV show decades ago?n/t
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)6. They say you can never be too rich or too thin...
...but check out those thighs...
That's what too thin looks like.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)8. It's too long anyway. Stupid outfit.
zbdent
(35,392 posts)9. I have numerous magazines full of pictures of women so poor
they can't afford clothing ...
(a nod to Night Court)