Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:50 PM Nov 2012

Was Petraeus the "Sex Scandal" Drudge was Teasing on October 31

Drudeg had a big ole siren teaser: Sex Scandal Hits Campaign," released at 7:30 or so October 31. We know Cantor went to FBI Director Mueller with the information on...October 31.

There's some delay, then Drudge releases the lame "scandal" about Bob Menendez at 2am on November 1.

It always struck me as off.

Now, to be fair, Drudge often teases complete bullshit and then ends up with something as lame as this. But this time the whole thing looked odd.

The tease - "Sex Scandal to Hit Campaign" - is utterly vague.

Menendez (single, by the way) is a well-known womanizer, which is why the reported scandal fizzed out in less than a news cycle. But here's the hypothesis: Cantor leaks this to Drudge, who teases it. Then Cantor, maybe after talking to Mueller, pulls back hard - no, no, no. So Drudge comes up with the utterly lame Menendez story, which had probably been sitting in a Daily Caller vault since summer.

I would be looking at contacts between Cantor's people and Drudge on October 31.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was Petraeus the "Sex Scandal" Drudge was Teasing on October 31 (Original Post) alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 OP
Drudge is definitely "in the loop" Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #1
Good catch, (or maybe a fish story). But, something tugged the line. leveymg Nov 2012 #2
Does that mean Drudge knew before the President? BlueToTheBone Nov 2012 #3
Maybe. Why do you think the president wasn't told? ret5hd Nov 2012 #4
Because I keep forgetting everyone lies. n/t BlueToTheBone Nov 2012 #5
So you think the president was told? ret5hd Nov 2012 #6
I have a hard time believing he didn't know marlakay Nov 2012 #8
Even tho since nixon it was a requirement to NOT tell the president? ret5hd Nov 2012 #10
What requirement is that? marlakay Nov 2012 #11
Who knows? Everyone lies. n/t BlueToTheBone Nov 2012 #12
You, for example? ret5hd Nov 2012 #13
and you for sure. n/t BlueToTheBone Nov 2012 #14
I think so... Spazito Nov 2012 #7
That is a great point. What about cantor position here? That needs to be explored. hrmjustin Nov 2012 #9

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
1. Drudge is definitely "in the loop"
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:54 PM
Nov 2012

and it was speculated here before that that particular salacious claim just died.

Cantor put politics before national security and he should be prosecuted for that.

marlakay

(11,493 posts)
8. I have a hard time believing he didn't know
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:03 PM
Nov 2012

and saying the WH didn't will come back to bite them in maybe years of wasted time like Clinton in hearings….

marlakay

(11,493 posts)
11. What requirement is that?
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:38 PM
Nov 2012

I have never heard of it…shouldn't our leader be informed if head of CIA could possibly have a security problem? If for no other reason then he should watch things he says to him for awhile...

Spazito

(50,454 posts)
7. I think so...
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:02 PM
Nov 2012

the timeline fits and the lame 'fill-in' of Menendez didn't fit the 'election changer' breathless alert by Drudge even by scumbag Drudge standards.

I think Cantor or someone else, maybe the shirtless FBI guy, whispered sweet nothings in Drudge's cruddy ear about this, Drudge did the flashing red light thing and then was called off the story because it wouldn't hurt the President but would hurt the repubs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was Petraeus the "Se...