Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,016 posts)
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:10 AM Nov 2012

Cantor lies about "whistleblower", was anything but

Cantor lies about "whistleblower", was anything but
by JohnAdams999

Turns out Cantor's "whistleblower" was not a whistleblower but a person who sent shirtless pics to one of the women in the investigation and leaked it to Cantor for political purposes because he thought it was a "coverup for Obama".

Ms. Kelley, a volunteer with wounded veterans and military families, brought her complaint to a rank-and-file agent she knew from a previous encounter with the F.B.I. office, the official also said. That agent, who had previously pursued a friendship with Ms. Kelley and had earlier sent her shirtless photographs of himself, was “just a conduit” for the complaint, he said. He had no training in cybercrime, was not part of the cyber squad handling the case and was never assigned to the investigation.

But the agent, who was not identified, continued to “nose around” about the case, and eventually his superiors “told him to stay the hell away from it, and he was not invited to briefings,” the official said. The Wall Street Journal first reported on Monday night that the agent had been barred from the case.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/us/timeline-shows-fbi-discovered-petraeus-affair-in-summer.html?hp


And more:

Later, the agent became convinced — incorrectly, the official said — that the case had stalled. Because of his “worldview,” as the official put it, he suspected a politically motivated cover-up to protect President Obama. The agent alerted Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, who called the F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, on Oct. 31 to tell him of the agent’s concerns.

The official said the agent’s self-described “whistle-blowing” was “a little embarrassing” but had no effect on the investigation.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/11/petraeus_likely_most_mentally_balanced_individual.php?ref=fpblg

So basically this entire scandal both at the outset and in the denouement was driven by Freakshow FBI Agent X who both wanted to bed the victim of the alleged harassment and also decided that the FBI was covering up it’s investigation of the Tampa socialite to protect President Obama. And this because of his “worldview”. Please let us meet this awesome example of American law enforcement.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/13/1161087/-Cantor-lies-about-whistleblower-was-anything-but
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cantor lies about "whistleblower", was anything but (Original Post) kpete Nov 2012 OP
I heard this on MSNBC yesterday.... Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #1
I just said in another post mercuryblues Nov 2012 #7
How dirty is that? Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #8
I need one more mercuryblues Nov 2012 #10
Very true. If we think it's bad, there's something worse going on underneath. loudsue Nov 2012 #18
Cantor Lies... KharmaTrain Nov 2012 #2
I hope this leaker sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #3
I hope so too LeftInTX Nov 2012 #24
"Based on what we're learning this morning... ProSense Nov 2012 #4
So basically the Republics involved in this blew their chance at a decent candidate in 2016 justiceischeap Nov 2012 #6
This is the part that I love the best! yardwork Nov 2012 #15
^^ This ^^ Hutzpa Nov 2012 #21
"Republics" is grammatically incorrect. TahitiNut Nov 2012 #23
What did Cantor know and when did he know it. godai Nov 2012 #5
Fire the shirtless guy JackN415 Nov 2012 #9
Cantor was the actual FBI target in this investigation NNN0LHI Nov 2012 #11
So this Benghazi "scandal"... liberalmuse Nov 2012 #12
hahahaha Hutzpa Nov 2012 #22
K&R stonecutter357 Nov 2012 #13
Cantor John2 Nov 2012 #14
But how did the "shirtless FBI agent" know that the harassing emails would lead to ciking724 Nov 2012 #16
Perhaps is what Fox specializes in. Coyotl Nov 2012 #20
What a tangled web we weave NBachers Nov 2012 #17
Sheesh! No KIDDING! Well, michael isikoff is ALIVE AND ON FIRE! He sure loves a sex scandal. calimary Nov 2012 #19

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
1. I heard this on MSNBC yesterday....
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:16 AM
Nov 2012

The FBI agent deserves to be drawn and quartered for this.

Here's my question...Was Cantor acting honorably when he didn't report this to Boehner and other Republicans....or was he hoping to take advantage of this himself in some way....or is this just another case of one Republican male protecting another?

mercuryblues

(14,537 posts)
7. I just said in another post
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:29 AM
Nov 2012

Cantor only told a select few people. I speculate that he was going to try to get Gen P to say a falsehood in the Benghazi hearing, that Cantor could use to impeach Obama. Making cantor the hero on the right. I think Gen P, wouldn't play the game and his affair exposed. No Democrats were informed

mercuryblues

(14,537 posts)
10. I need one more
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:49 AM
Nov 2012

These are republicans we are talking about. What they do, is much worse than what I think they are doing.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
18. Very true. If we think it's bad, there's something worse going on underneath.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:03 PM
Nov 2012

I just hope Obama has the scope of this, and they can turn the tables on the traitors.

sandyshoes17

(657 posts)
3. I hope this leaker
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:21 AM
Nov 2012

starts talking, seems like Cantor thru him under the bus. He can be in a lot of trouble.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. "Based on what we're learning this morning...
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:21 AM
Nov 2012
<...>

Based on what we're learning this morning, it appears much of this scandal was fueled by bizarre personal conduct, and a strange FBI agent who was a little too eager to undermine President Obama before the election with a controversy that had nothing to do with the White House.

Indeed, had the FBI agent in question not believed weird conspiracy theories about the president, he wouldn't have gone to Republican lawmakers, who in turn wouldn't have pushed the issue, which means the Petraeus scandal -- which involved no criminal wrongdoing -- probably would have gone away without further incident.

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/11/13/15136065-petraeus-sex-scandal-manages-to-get-even-stranger

Seems like some Republicans were aiming for a set up and it back fired.

Idiots.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
6. So basically the Republics involved in this blew their chance at a decent candidate in 2016
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:27 AM
Nov 2012

I can live with that.

yardwork

(61,707 posts)
15. This is the part that I love the best!
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:39 AM
Nov 2012

Any way we look at this, the Republicans lost big. They lost Petraeus, who was their guy embedded in the Obama administration, first in charge of both wars and then in charge of the CIA, and a probable 2016 contender.

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
21. ^^ This ^^
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:05 PM
Nov 2012

it's called the long term game and they've lost big time and there I believe there is more to come, some people are going to pay for the loss of Ambassador Stevens life.

Team kick ass are not in play mode. These are the sign to look for which will give you an indication of how Obama is going to run his second term.



KICK ASS MODE has been triggered, no more Mr Nice Guy.

godai

(2,902 posts)
5. What did Cantor know and when did he know it.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:23 AM
Nov 2012

What's he hiding? How did he know the FBI agent? Silly, I know but seems Central Command needs to move out of Tampa. It always bothered me that Tommy Franks would sit in Tampa and supposedly run the wars, probably in between rounds of golf and parties.

ciking724

(78 posts)
16. But how did the "shirtless FBI agent" know that the harassing emails would lead to
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 11:41 AM
Nov 2012

the administration or the general? Perhaps he was already monitoring the emails and knew of the affair or affairs, both Paula and Jill. I'm leaning toward the blackmail theory. They were attempting to blackmail General Petraeus. Now I am beginning to believe that Jill did not report anything to the shirtless guy, especially if she was having an affair with the other general; she would not want to be exposed on that. The shirtless guy was reading her emails back and forth to the other general and got a little worked up and decided he would get in on the action by sending a shirtless photo of himself. Very strange behavior, indeed!

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
20. Perhaps is what Fox specializes in.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:03 PM
Nov 2012

They lean a lot

Grasping at straws because of a "worldview" might mean his windmill is leaning too!

calimary

(81,467 posts)
19. Sheesh! No KIDDING! Well, michael isikoff is ALIVE AND ON FIRE! He sure loves a sex scandal.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:30 PM
Nov 2012

Just saw him on MSNBC, and was struck by his body language. Eyes wide open, almost bugging out at times, eyebrows dancing up and down, leaning in toward the camera with his head slightly cocked to the side, "lettin' you in on the dirty stuff." He reminded me of Rona Barrett, the onetime Hollywood gossip columnist. She always delivered her lines, on camera, with her head cocked in this sly little sideways posture where she was kinda looking at you with a wink and an "oooh, tsk-tsk, guess what I found out!" He made me think of her immediately. Almost shameless. He was damn near drooling. Somebody needs to give that guy a bib! Or maybe his own peep show.

Same stuff went on during the Monica Lewinsky business. OMG was he slobbering back then!!! And when all that settled down and the scandals and potential scandals in the bush/cheney administration came and went with nary an eyelash batting, and he'd reliably come up with SQUAT time after time, I concluded that the guy was utterly useless, and couldn't find his way around an investigation unless there was a stained blue dress and a Clinton involved.

Well, michael isikoff sure is back up and cranking today! He's got a juicy new sex scandal to sink his teeth into. Oh boy! I swear - he could hardly sit still. I'm surprised he didn't arrive on the set with a knife and fork.



But, with a hard-on like this, I'm sure he's probably gonna dig up some kinda dirt. This kind of story is REALLY his thing!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cantor lies about "w...