Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 08:22 AM Nov 2012

Broadwell moonlighted as gun model

Broadwell moonlighted as gun model
Details continue to emerge about Paula Broadwell, reported mistress of former CIA director David Petraeus.

(Kim Bhasin, Business Insider) -- Details continue to emerge about Paula Broadwell, the reported mistress of former CIA director David Petraeus.

In Michael D. Shear's profile of Broadwell in The New York Times, he mentions that she was "a model for a machine gun manufacturer."

Business Insider did a bit more digging and stumbled on a promotional video for KRISS which features Broadwell in her role as, according to her website, “female model / demonstrator."

She comes in at 1:26:


Read more: http://www.kfab.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104707&article=10565536#ixzz2C6YQVB2J

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
6. WARNING: Do not take the lid off the Dangerous Republican Diaper-sex subculture
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 09:33 AM
Nov 2012

Stinks bad enuf already.

The Republicans Senatorial Caucus actually gave a STANDING OVATION to the current Republican Senator who was outed for having loads of, um, "Diaper Sex" with a paid hooker.

I thought the whole "Republican Family Values" schtick bottomed out (smirk) with that travesty. But now it seems the Republicans decadent values are about to GO LOW LOW LOWER.

lapfog_1

(29,223 posts)
4. "a computer can't come up with a strategy of unity of effort"
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 08:38 AM
Nov 2012

"by that I mean forcing the State Department and the Department of Defense and other organizations.... to work together".

Seriously, does anyone actually talk this way?

I wonder how she "forces" the State Department to work together with the DOD? She makes the State Department sound like they are the enemy...



lapfog_1

(29,223 posts)
10. no... she was talking about computer technology and what it can and cannot do
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 09:42 AM
Nov 2012

nothing to do with firing guns...

And it's a direct quote from the video... forcing the State Department to work with the DoD was something she stated that computers could not do.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
14. No, she is referring to Patreaus' wish for State to be subordinate to Defense.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:15 AM
Nov 2012

He wanted State to do his bidding overseas when he was in theatre.

Bush gave him localized control over State.

That shit ended when Hillary took over.

Generals usually make for some lousy diplomats, they mostly fuck that side of things up badly.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
13. Lying cheaters lie, and cheating liars cheat
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:10 AM
Nov 2012

I don't care what they look like. A person stepping out on his or her spouse and family is a real turn-off for me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Broadwell moonlighted as ...