Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,205 posts)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 11:52 PM Nov 2012

Romney's pollster should be chased out of the industry.

No Republican candidate for major office should ever hire Neil Newhouse again. We had fun this year watching Rasmussen inflate the voter ID in his polls. We rolled our eyes listening about unskewed polls, but at the end of the day, their polls are nothing but entertainment value. On the other hand, internal presidential campaign polls determine how valuable time and millions of dollars are spent. Yet Newhouse decided, on no objective basis, that the Republican share of the vote would be the same as 2004 or 2010 and that Obama would not be able to generate the same level of enthusiasm as 2008. Good pollsters don't make assumptions, they research and measure. And if the numbers don't look good, they are what they are. At least Romney would not have been spending time in Pennsylvania during the last week of the campaign. And they might have saved themselves the embarrassment of buying that firework display.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
1. Why should Democrats care if a Republican Presidential
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:03 AM
Nov 2012

campaign wants to hire Newhouse? I'd rather see us refer Newhouse to a campaign than tell that campaign, "he's bad news, he's incompetent, don't hire Newhouse!"

RandySF

(59,205 posts)
4. I'm putting aide my partisan leanings for a moment
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:21 AM
Nov 2012

and pointing out the unprofessionalism of a pollster who just made a killing working for the Republican presidential nominee.

Tutonic

(2,522 posts)
2. Well that would be Richie Beeson who famously said:
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:12 AM
Nov 2012

"They (Obama for America) are underperforming what their 2008 numbers were and we are overperforming where we were in 2008," said Rich Beeson, Romney's political director. "We feel very good heading into the Tuesday election." He predicted 300+ electoral votes. Putz.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
3. can't help but wonder what the Romney and Ryan families are doing right now
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:16 AM
Nov 2012

marinated in misery, I hope. crying their rich eyes out.

I feel sorry for their staff and household help tho - can you imagine how snappy and mean the Queen and the Putz are these last few days.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
5. They based their numbers on 2004 white voter turnout models
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 12:24 AM
Nov 2012

without accounting for minority votes. Said that the "enthusiasm" wasn't there.

They were wrong.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney's pollster should ...