Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 07:58 PM Nov 2012

Romney the Great Manager? Not Nearly as Good as Obama, the Election Proved

In the days since the election we have learned that President Barack Obama‘s campaign had an amazingly advanced and disciplined ground game that knew just what precincts and even voters to target and how to target them, based on polling information that predicted how the vote was going with uncanny precision. Yet Mitt Romney was the man running as the experienced manager, the man whose years running a business uniquely qualified him to run the biggest, most complex organization on earth, the federal government. That was his main, most consistent claim to the office. Now it looks more as if, though he may have been very good at buying and selling companies and extracting profit from them, he wasn’t nearly as good at heading an effective complex organization as President Obama.

As a commenter on Andrew Sullivan’s blog summed it up,

Obama executed quantifiable long-term plans, adaptable short-term planning, an innovative GOTV initiative and plotted better ad strategies, while Romney had the ORCA trainwreck [see below], inaccurate internal polling, poorly informed managers and insufficient fiscal planning (e.g. coffers too low in July to react to the Obama ad blitz seems so minor league!). Not to mention its upper management was rewarded with bonuses in September, right after the languid convention and the embarrassing European trip.

The blogger Allahpundit has a very good post about the difference in the organizational success of the campaigns, in which he writes,

This was supposed to be Romney’s strength, the reason to prefer him to Gingrich, Santorum, etc. Even if he didn’t always seem so “severely conservative,” he could be trusted to hold his own against Team Hopenchange in a battle of the ground games. After all, that’s his brand — he’s a managerial genius. If anyone could build a company capable of capturing the presidency, he could.

<snip>

http://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickallen/2012/11/10/romney-the-great-manager-not-nearly-as-good-as-obama-the-election-proved/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney the Great Manager? Not Nearly as Good as Obama, the Election Proved (Original Post) cali Nov 2012 OP
Only thing rmoney's 'good' at managing is elleng Nov 2012 #1
He ran such a poor campaign I shudder to think how he would've run the country. We sure Raine Nov 2012 #2
Many bullets Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #3
It was all a con for the cash... TeamPooka Nov 2012 #4

elleng

(131,008 posts)
1. Only thing rmoney's 'good' at managing is
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 07:59 PM
Nov 2012

tax code vis-a-vis his tax obligations. THAT's what he does.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
2. He ran such a poor campaign I shudder to think how he would've run the country. We sure
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 08:08 PM
Nov 2012

dodged a bullet on that one, whew.

TeamPooka

(24,234 posts)
4. It was all a con for the cash...
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:03 PM
Nov 2012

from one of the articles linked in the link....
"Even with something as simple as buying airtime for ads, Romney reportedly used an unusual in-house system that made things more expensive than they needed to be."
So his crony's could bank more cash, I'm sure.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/08/how-romney-got-out-organized-by-obama/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney the Great Manager?...