General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor Fuck's Sake: "Obama Had A Super-Majority In Congress For 2 Years" Meme Reappears
I am hearing this shit from my RW friends. It's their way of saying that President Obama won't get anything done, because "he couldn't get anything done his first two years when he had a filibuster-proof Senate and a huge majority in the House."
Well, that's a LIE, of course.
First off, Obama's first two years in office encompass the period of Jan 2009 - Jan 2011. From Jan 2009 - July 2009, Norm Coleman sat in Al Franken's Senate seat. That's the first 6-plus months of Obama's first term. No super majority there.
Ted Kennedy died in Aug, 2009. Scott Brown won his Senate seat and took office in Feb 2010. Hey, there goes the entire second year in Obama's first term! You know, the year that ran from Jan 2010-Jan 2011. Brown taking office in Feb 2010 ended the D's super majority in the Senate, both technically and realistically.
So the best one can say is that the Ds had a supermajority in the Senate from the time Al Franken was seated until the time Scott Brown took office, ie: a 7.5 month period.
But that supermajority was only a technicality, because Teddy Kennedy cast his last Senate vote in April, 2009 and never returned. The actual viable supermajority didn't exist until Paul Kirk was sworn in as Teddy's replacement in September, 2009. But the Senate went home for the holidays in October, so no effective supermajority there, either.
In fact, the Ds had an effective supermajority in the Senate for a total of 24 days between the time Paul Kirk was sworn in and the time that Scott Brown was sworn in as Kirk's replacement. That's it. A mere three-plus weeks of legislative days, NOT two years. Not even one year. Not even 7 months.
How does a meme like that keep going to where Rmoney felt comfortable using that as a talking point during the campaign? How does it happen that the talking heads on TV repeat that LIE repeatedly and never get called on it?
And this fact doesn't even address their lie that Obama didn't get anything done in his first two years. That's a whole 'nother rant.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)EC
(12,287 posts)of everything he did get accomplished it was during those two years. Of course that's why they don't like the stimulus or saving the auto industry or Lilly Leadbetter.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Who insist Obama had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate for two years. These memes persist. And it seems, alas, that no amount of explaining Franken, Kennedy, et al. helps.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)The 60th vote was Joe LIEberman.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Cirque du So-What
(25,951 posts)whom the repugs could rely upon to vote against any remotely progressive legislation.