Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 05:34 PM Nov 2012

Duh! Well I just read something that makes me feel really stupid...


I cannot believe that I did not know how the number of electoral votes each state is determined until I just read the bolded text in the excerpt a few minutes ago...


-snip-

Silver infuriated conservatives with his model, which uses a number of measurements and calculations, including attention to state polls.

Regardless of the national surveys, Obama maintained a steady lead in most of the swing states in the last month, most notably Ohio, without which a Republican has never won the presidency.

U.S. elections are won in the Electoral College, where each state receives votes equaling the total of their two U.S. senators and their number of House representatives. The aggregate data from Real Clear Politics and Pollster.com also showed an Obama advantage in all of the swing states except North Carolina.

-snip-
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/uselection/article/1284100--u-s-election-nate-silver-and-two-university-profs-go-50-0-in-predictions



I am amazed that I did not know that!
It never dawned on me in the past to go look to see how the states ended up with the number of EVs that they have

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Duh! Well I just read something that makes me feel really stupid... (Original Post) Tx4obama Nov 2012 OP
Don't feel too bad. I knew it was related to state population... arcane1 Nov 2012 #1
I didn't know either! AzDar Nov 2012 #2
If they based it on population, Wyoming would get ONE! MADem Nov 2012 #3
it's ok i didn't know either JanT Nov 2012 #4
I would venture to guess Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #5
Its all arithmetic!! Historic NY Nov 2012 #6
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
1. Don't feel too bad. I knew it was related to state population...
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 05:37 PM
Nov 2012

but until just now I didn't know it was specifically the formula in your OP.

We're still both smarter and more politically astute than the best of the teabaggers

MADem

(135,425 posts)
3. If they based it on population, Wyoming would get ONE!
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 05:38 PM
Nov 2012

Nothing there but steers and Dick Cheney's soulless heart.

JanT

(229 posts)
4. it's ok i didn't know either
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 05:43 PM
Nov 2012

until i started to do some research. i have learned a lot of information lately about the "process". Maybe i had civics class in school, but i am afraid i graduated in 1969 and i have slept since then so much of what i learned has not been retained. there is a wealth of information on various Gov web sites and right here on DU i have learned a lot. I believe that if there was a campaign to educate the public more about the political process, that educated people would then make more educated choices and we wouldn't see another campaign as we just went through. There are so many uneducated people out there! It's amazing how much crap was flung around and people really believed it. so sad.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Duh! Well I just read som...