Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver was not the most accurate Pundit (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Nov 2012 OP
Weee Coulter predicted beter than Rove! Egnever Nov 2012 #1
ROTFLMBAO!! ConnorMarc Nov 2012 #4
Nate Silver made the last two weeks bearable for me. eyewall Nov 2012 #2
I'm so glad the NYTs hired him so he got Ichingcarpenter Nov 2012 #5
Nate Silver's blue/red map on the right side of his page - he got all the states the correct colors Tx4obama Nov 2012 #3
I Agree Egnever Nov 2012 #6
Does this include Florida? hlthe2b Nov 2012 #7
He's not a pundit. He's a statistician. Big difference. He doesn't opine. He does numbers & lets Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #8
Exactly BumRushDaShow Nov 2012 #9
Yeah, just because we're feeling good this morning... William Seger Nov 2012 #10
 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
1. Weee Coulter predicted beter than Rove!
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 05:25 AM
Nov 2012

How embarrassing is that?

Also George will and Dick Moris were beaten by unskewed polls LOL

Just to much to laugh at there.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
5. I'm so glad the NYTs hired him so he got
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 05:37 AM
Nov 2012

out on the airwaves and net.

I didn't follow Putnan at all.


Anyway its an interesting graph.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
3. Nate Silver's blue/red map on the right side of his page - he got all the states the correct colors
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 05:34 AM
Nov 2012

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

In my opinion Nate got it 100% right

hlthe2b

(102,413 posts)
7. Does this include Florida?
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:22 AM
Nov 2012

Regardless, how do Nate Silver's detractors think they appear by trying so desperately to disparage him for being #2 rather than 100% perfect? He was accurate as hell, even if not perfect.

Really? How?

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. He's not a pundit. He's a statistician. Big difference. He doesn't opine. He does numbers & lets
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 08:29 AM
Nov 2012

the numbers speak for themselves.

William Seger

(10,779 posts)
10. Yeah, just because we're feeling good this morning...
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 09:08 AM
Nov 2012

... doesn't mean we can't find some Cheerios to piss in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nate Silver was not the m...