General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNate Silver was not the most accurate Pundit
Josh Putnan was..... Slate has a bullseye graph on how the pundits scored... Nate came in 2nd.
Its an active graph so I can't post it.
Unskewed polls is on it too.
go to link.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/pundit_scorecard_checking_pundits_predictions_against_the_actual_results.html
Egnever
(21,506 posts)How embarrassing is that?
Also George will and Dick Moris were beaten by unskewed polls LOL
Just to much to laugh at there.
ConnorMarc
(653 posts)Too funny.
eyewall
(674 posts)I'm extremely grateful...
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)out on the airwaves and net.
I didn't follow Putnan at all.
Anyway its an interesting graph.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)He was perfect.
hlthe2b
(102,413 posts)Regardless, how do Nate Silver's detractors think they appear by trying so desperately to disparage him for being #2 rather than 100% perfect? He was accurate as hell, even if not perfect.
Really? How?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)the numbers speak for themselves.
BumRushDaShow
(129,645 posts)Lumping he and Sam Wang in the same category as Dick Morris or Karl Rove is just idiotic.
William Seger
(10,779 posts)... doesn't mean we can't find some Cheerios to piss in.