Bachman Race as of 2:39am 11/7/2012

[Tigress DEM]

U.S. Representative District 6
280 precincts in contest. 254 of 280 precincts reported in District.

Candidate MICHELE BACHMANN Totals 154997 PCT 50.14%
Candidate JIM GRAVES .............Totals 153292 PCT 49.59%
Candidate WRITE-IN** .............Totals 856 PCT 0.28%

[Tigress DEM]

1. Numbers are switching.

Precincts Reporting in State: 91.43%
256 of 280 Last Updated: 11/07/12 2:58 AM Voters Registered at 7AM : 386597

U.S. Representative District 6
Party .............................. Candidate ...................Totals .........Pct
Republican .....................MICHELE BACHMANN ....155727 ...... 0.50%
Democratic-Farmer-Labor...JIM GRAVES .................154483 ...... 0.50%
Write-In ......................WRITE-IN** ................... 866 .......0.00%



Michelle, are you stealing from the "write in" candidate totals?

[Tigress DEM]

4. check

http://electionresults.sos.state.mn.us/ENR/Results/GetByOfficeId/1?officeid=8



Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Results Home « Previous Page
Precincts Reporting in State: 97.5% 273 of 280
Last Updated: 11/07/12 3:32 AM Voters Registered at 7AM : 386597

U.S. Representative District 6

Party Candidate Totals Pct Graph
Republican MICHELE BACHMANN 170797 0.50%
Democratic-Farmer-Labor JIM GRAVES 167124 0.49%
Write-In WRITE-IN** 925 0.00%

[pinboy3niner]

2. Bachmann now ahead by more than 2,100 with 93% in

Minnesota 06 Updated 3 minutes ago

Michele Bachmann 50%
158,779

Jim GravesVotes 50%

156,661

http://us.cnn.com/election/2012/results/state/MN

[joshcryer]

3. F**k.

[pinboy3niner]

5. Damn! Her lead is now more than 2,600 with 97% in. nt

[Tigress DEM]

6. Somehow they are using the "write in" percentage for Michele. I just know it.

AT ONE POINT:
THE WRITE IN*** is 0.28% then drops to 0.00%

U.S. Representative District 6
280 precincts in contest.
257 of 280 precincts reported in District.

Candidate Totals Pct Graph
MICHELE BACHMANN 155963 50.02%
JIM GRAVES 154971 49.70%
WRITE-IN** 869 for 0.28%


@ 3:09am Under the BY Candidate Section
Bachmann has 155963 showing "0.50%"
Jim Graves has 154971 showing "0.50%"
and the WRITE IN TOTAL is 869 for "0.00%"
PRECINCTS Reporting in State: 91.79% 257 of 280

9 minutes earlier:

@ 3:00am Under the BY Candidate Section
Bachmann has 155727 showing "0.50%"
Jim Graves has 154483 showing "0.50%"
and the WRITE IN TOTAL is 866 for "0.00%"
PRECINCTS Reporting in State: 91.43% 256 of 280


MOVING FOWARD to 3:32am
Under the BY Candidate Section
Bachmann has 170797 showing "0.50%"
Jim Graves has 167124 showing "0.49%"
and the WRITE IN TOTAL is 925 for "0.00%"
PRECINCTS Reporting in State: 97.5% 273 of 280



I don't know exactly HOW but Bachmann is manipulating this data

[Tigress DEM]

7. SO TIRED of this lying cheating cretin Bachmann

Precincts Reporting in State: 97.5% 273 of 280
Last Updated: 11/07/12 3:46 AM Voters Registered at 7AM : 386597

U.S. Representative District 6
Party Candidate Totals Pct Graph
Republican MICHELE BACHMANN 172513 0.50%
Democratic-Farmer-Labor JIM GRAVES 168521 0.49%
Write-In WRITE-IN** 930 for 0.00%


The WRITE-IN total continues to grow but the "percentage" remains at zero and Bachmann's totals are inflating.... possibly by some percent of the WRITE-IN which can obviously be altered later?

My brain is so tired, I can't do the math right now, but I've been taking screen shots as these change, cropping it in paint and dumping it in a WORD doc. Not perfectly scientific, but here in the middle of the night things are being manipulated and the numbers are NOT adding up.

The fact that the numbers changed on both candidates and were NOT equal, but both showed 50% is a COMPLETE mathematical impossibility.

For the WRITE IN to go from 0.28% to ZERO and STAY there while the numbers climb is ALSO NOT possible if these numbers were simply being reported and not rigged.

[Tigress DEM]

9. Right now, I'm just gathering the evidence.

Precincts Reporting in State: 97.86% 274 of 280
Last Updated: 11/07/12 4:02 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM : 386597


U.S. Representative District 6
Party Candidate Totals Pct Graph
Republican MICHELE BACHMANN 176284 0.50%
Democratic-Farmer-Labor JIM GRAVES 172553 0.49%
Write-In WRITE-IN** 958 for 0.00%


I'm certain there will be a way to correlate these, but I also need to find someone in Michele Bachmann's district that can issue a voter challenge and get a manual recount. With these imaginary numbers who knows when it started going into fantasy land???

[joshcryer]

11. No offense but the "write in" tally still doesn't stem the gap.

She's still winning by several thousand votes.

[pinboy3niner]

14. You're misinterpreting the change in the write-in percentage

For the WRITE IN to go from 0.28% to ZERO and STAY there while the numbers climb is ALSO NOT possible if these numbers were simply being reported and not rigged.

Yes, the number of write-ins increased, but the total votes increased by FAR more, so the higher number of write-ins decreased as a percentage of the total vote.

When the write-ins went up to 958 that percentage dropped to zero because the total votes also increased--a LOT--and at that point 958 was less than 3 1000ths of 1% of the total votes.

[Tigress DEM]

20. OK, here is where I first saw it

I can buy that the increase is quite a bit more and dwarfs the "write ins" past the 3rd decimal but how did it go to EXACTLY 50% and just hang there?

Bachman Race as of 2:39am 11/7/2012
U.S. Representative District 6
280 precincts in contest. 254 of 280 precincts reported in District.

Candidate MICHELE BACHMANN Totals 154997 PCT 50.14%
Candidate JIM GRAVES .............Totals 153292 PCT 49.59%
Candidate WRITE-IN** .............Totals 856 PCT 0.28%

**********************TOTAL from above 309145 aka 100%

Precincts Reporting in State: 91.43%
256 of 280 Last Updated: 11/07/12 2:58 AM Voters Registered at 7AM : 386597

U.S. Representative District 6
Party .............................. Candidate ...................Totals .........Pct
Republican .....................MICHELE BACHMANN ....155727 ...... 0.50% (730 added)
Democratic-Farmer-Labor...JIM GRAVES ..............154483 ...... 0.50% (1191 added)
Write-In ......................WRITE-IN** ................... 866 .......0.00% ( 10 added)
************************ TOTAL from above 311076 aka 100%

@ 3:00am Under the BY Candidate Section
Bachmann has 155727 showing "0.50%" ( +236 for 3:09am total of 155963 )
Jim Graves has 154483 showing "0.50%" ( + 488 for 3:09am total of 154971 )
and the WRITE IN TOTAL is 866 for "0.00%"
PRECINCTS Reporting in State: 91.43% 256 of 280
TOTAL from above 311076 aka 100%

@ 3:09am Under the BY Candidate Section
Bachmann has 155963 showing "0.50%"
Jim Graves has 154971 showing "0.50%"
and the WRITE IN TOTAL is 869 for "0.00%"
PRECINCTS Reporting in State: 91.79% 257 of 280
TOTAL from above 311803 aka 100%

[Tigress DEM]

22. Think I have my own answer. They changed to a less detailed % for accounting.

Candidate MICHELE BACHMANN Totals 154997 PCT 50.14%
Candidate JIM GRAVES .............Totals 153292 PCT 49.59%
Candidate WRITE-IN** .............Totals 856 PCT 0.28%

It WAS like a flip of a switch....

50.14% becomes 50% drop the .14
49.59% rounds up to 50% drop the .59
0.28% rounds down to 0.00% drop the .28


Thanks to 12+ years of stolen elections and constant attempts to lie to us, I no longer trust these people at all.

[doccraig67]

8. She'll win. Sadly!!

[Tigress DEM]

10. NO she won't. She's cheating and she's going to get called out on it.

TIRED of these punks stealing our elections.

[Tigress DEM]

13. I'm adding up the numbers separately. Very little sleep.

Precincts Reporting in State: 98.21% 275 of 280
Last Updated: 11/07/12 4:34 AM Voters Registered at 7AM : 386597

U.S. Representative District 6
Party Candidate Totals Pct Graph
Republican MICHELE BACHMANN 176723 0.50%
Democratic-Farmer-Labor JIM GRAVES 173467 0.49%
Write-In WRITE-IN** 965 for 0.00%

[UnrepentantLiberal]

12. It's not the worst thing that could happen.

She's a constant reminder of just how crazy the Republican base really is.

[Tigress DEM]

15. We got rid of Jesse Ventura - We're getting rid of Bachmann

Minnesota does not need a Do nothing Tea Party whiner who has to rig an election to get the needed votes.

HE was just annoying. She's a waste of space.

[UnrepentantLiberal]

16. True.

She's very bad for Minnesota.

[Tigress DEM]

17. Trying to work out the actual numbers. Sigh.

Precincts Reporting in State: 98.21% 275 of 280
Last Updated: 11/07/12 5:04 AM Voters Registered at 7AM : 386597

U.S. Representative District 6
Party Candidate Totals Pct Graph
Republican MICHELE BACHMANN 176723 0.50%
Democratic-Farmer-Labor JIM GRAVES 173467 0.49%
Write-In WRITE-IN** 965 for 0.00%

[renie408]

18. Doesn't accusing her of cheating and stealing the race kind of make us sound like them?

Maybe she just WON. She was projected to win all along, wasn't she? I am shocked it was even as close as it was.

[Tigress DEM]

21. Not if she did it. Anyway in MN it will probably produce a recount anyway.

We are still looking at 1% right now. Numbers are big, but percentage wise it's still as close as the Franken Coleman race.

Thing is DEMs do not HAVE the history of disenfranchising people. We bend over backwards to be fair. ALL I WANT to see is that the votes were fairly counted.

It's TRUE that I just want her GONE because she's VERY bad for Minnesota.

BUT if she truly won without cheating, fine. I'll deal with it.