= new reply since forum marked as read
Unless you get a look at their book collection or their car. 
So fussing about being connected as "not being green" just doesn't resonate with me.
One of the big debates post-Sandy was whether cell towers were now going to be considered "infrastructure" (which implies a whole nother level of federal subsidy than we currently assign wireless technology).
I inferred that would apply to all the other "wifi" connectivity we use.
In general, I believe her message is great for our "earth community" so there's the social value of helping her fellow human with this movement. So even if her ONLY social "good" was codifying this movement, okay. I'm good with that.
Specifically there's no indication of what she does towards taking care of other members of that society. Honestly, if she only takes care of her family, her parents and her neighbors - well, I'd still applaud even that effort - sometimes that's all the extra you have to give.
Personally, I think its a GREAT message and I try to implement as much of it as I can in my own life. That doesn't make me anti-social (although I have been accused of being a big curmudgeon! )
Great article closeupready. Don't laugh OR cry! This is a great way of life....
I'm also a weird conglomeration of self-sufficiency, "off the grid" productivity, and serendipitous rural good luck.
My life is strange. I will say I find it plausible that she's cobbled together her way of life without a trust fund. I/we did (my family). We're thriving - my husband and I have both come from poverty.
So your OP, and her message, kinda resonates with me but not in a bad way.
FWIW, I never go barefoot nor did I homeschool so there's that but I do cook like a fiend, garden, can and preserve so maybe I qualify as an extremist.... lol.
Change starts with YOU, not "I saw it on TV" or "Michael Phelps does it" or whatever. In other words, if her argument is that the social change you want to see happen can be precipitated with your help, even if you are the first one, then it's a good argument. 
I don't see a Randian undercurrent there, personally
...that could totally be me. Once we have a real house and not this crappy fucking apartment, that will certainly be me.
Yes, there are some of those radical homesteaders, homeschoolers and off-the-grid folks who live that lifestyle because they dearly want to shelter themselves and their children from the outside world. They believe being worldly is sinful and evil and no good will come of it. They believe the big bad gubment wants to control them and take everything away from them, so othey live as off the grid and off the radar as possible. So, yes, there are severely conservative and some Randian people who live like this for sure.
However, there are a hell of a lot of filthy liberal hippies who are like this. Many of us live this way because we believe it is way better to protect our planet and our children. We are not mass consumers, not because we don't want our country to prosper, but because we believe over consumption has done a lot to harm the planet's health and our health. I mean, 40 years ago, self storage places didn't exist. Now, there are over a billion locations where you can store all of your extra crap. It's done with the whole world in mind - we don't buy every new plastic and sparkly gadget because we don't want to contribute to the horrid conditions in factories overseas where Romney sends jobs. We believe that we need to move back to making things in America. We believe in investing in our local communities - that means avoiding all the big box stores if possible and shopping at local businesses, buying food from local farmers and planting our own gardens and/or raising our own livestock, bees, what have you. Many of us cook from scratch because it's way, way cheaper and much healthier. I mean, it costs me about $0.50 cents to make a loaf of bread - and that's organic and non-GMO. It has 4 ingredients, as opposed to the 15 ingredients in the so-called natural bread I used to buy. I don't buy many prepackaged things because food today is over-processed and full of crap that's not beneficial and all that packaging can't be good for the planet. I do my best to cook everything from scratch and it's saved our family a lot of money. It's a lost art. There is a certain amount of pride that comes with it. I'm learning to sew, knit and crochet because I think it's awesome to be able to make your own clothes, blankets and toys. We're definitely not the type to say, "Every many for himself." When you live this way, you form many relationships with local businesses and farmer. When you barter and trade, you HAVE to have good relationships. This is actually a way to become very strongly involved in your community. A lot of folks I know like this are more than willing to help out a neighbor or their community if need be. They are definitely the type who believe that we are ALL in this together and that we must take care of one another. We're trying to live a more sustainable life because it's healthier for this planet and it's healthier for our children. Like I said, we live in an apartment, but I'm trying my best. Once we get into a house in the next few years, I will have gardens and I will preserve what I grow...and give some away.
As for homeschooling - as I said, there are definitely people who homeschool in order to shelter their children from all the evil in this world, like gays and Obama. I know some people like that. However, there are a lot of homeschoolers who are just the opposite and who don't do it for religious reasons. Homeschooling gets a bad rap primarily because of the religious cults that use it, but it's not social isolation for the kids and they do, in fact, turn out to be very normal, very smart and very productive members of society.
This lady doesn't sound like an Ayn Rand disciple or like anyone who would think we all need to be on our own. I noticed that the article said she has a doctorate in community organizing. She's probably one of us. 
