General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBig update from Jim Messina
Jim Messina ?@Messina2012
FACT: In CO, FL, IA, NC, and NV, 1.4 million non-midterm Dems have voted already, compared with just 840,000 non-midterm Republicans.
https://twitter.com/Messina2012
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)erik satie
(81 posts)LisaL
(44,974 posts)DarthDem
(5,256 posts). . . in the midterms. The ones that didn't go so well for us. Different story this time around. In fact, there may never be a midterm election like that one again in terms of the low ebb of Democratic enthusiasm.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)And let the tea party take over.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Nancy Waterman
(6,407 posts)because they didn't vote last time
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)I could kill him but he's mine and I can't.
barnabas63
(1,214 posts)...it's hard to understand what they really mean.
Wounded Bear
(58,713 posts)Not saying it decides anything, because Repubs tend to outvote Dems on election day, but I'd rather be leading than not.
ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)The numbers will change. Question is, by how much.
vdogg
(1,384 posts)Is that polling firms relying on 2010 turnout models to determine likely voters are screwed.
dsc
(52,166 posts)while they are getting out their usual voters. In other words, our early voters likely wouldn't have shown up on election day while theirs likely would have.
I know everyone's been working hard!
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)On election day, you just can't waste any time with reluctant voters.
That's a pretty big spread, but I wish I knew the state breakdown. I don't blame Messina for keeping that close to the vest.
This directly addresses the GOP claim that the Dem advantage in early voting was because were were just getting our Election Day voters to come out early. Clearly that is not the case. Messina has said all along that we are targeting the more reluctant voters for early voting, and this is evidence that he was telling the truth.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)He's daring Gallup to retain the same for their November 5 poll. The Gallup model takes into account whether somebody voted in the latest midterm, and gives that variable a weight. It also weights Democrat or Republican based on historical data that Republican registered voters are more likely to vote. Together, those two variables have been largely responsible for Gallup's big Romney lead. Messina is saying, "So, check this out, Gallup. We are fielding huge numbers of registered Democrats who didn't vote in the latest midterm. So, you wanna stick with your model, or do you want to be right?"
ItsTheMediaStupid
(2,800 posts)nt
BumRushDaShow
(129,513 posts)U.S. Voter Turnout Will Likely Fall Short of 2004, 2008
Fewer voters this year say they are thinking about election, will definitely vote
by Jeffrey M. Jones
PRINCETON, NJ -- Key Gallup indicators of voter turnout, collected prior to superstorm Sandy, suggest voter turnout will fall short of what it was in 2004 and 2008. U.S. registered voters report giving less thought to the election, and are less likely to rate their chance of voting as a "10" on a 10-point scale, than in 2004 and 2008, two higher-turnout elections. However, the 2012 figures are higher than in 1996 and 2000, two lower-turnout elections.
More: http://www.gallup.com/poll/158435/voter-turnout-likely-fall-short-2004-2008.aspx
wishlist
(2,795 posts)Obama leads among registered voters more than among likely voters in most polls. Pollsters consider likely voters to be those who did vote in midterms and are more likely to vote now. Therefore this is a good sign that Dems who are registered but didn't vote in 2010 (when Repubs came out more) are coming out this time more than Repubs who also didn't vote in 2010
chieftain
(3,222 posts)Non mid term Dems fit that category. The idea of getting sporadic voters to the polls early is not just to bank votes but to expand the electorate with Obama voters who don't always get to the polls on E Day.