General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs this a real photo of Ann Romney or has it been photoshopped?
Nothing wrong with wrinkled skin but this she looks so much older here than in other photos. What gives?
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)A FB friend posted a flattering pic of her, the best one I've seen - I was going to say it wasn't her, but decided to avoid politics on FB.
She is over 60, isn't she? Is she much younger than her mitwit spouse?
avebury
(10,952 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Especially light from the side, it emphasizes wrinkles. The chicken skin is due to her skin type, dry, and time spent in the sun. I don't know her age but she looks great really, except for her neck. That's usually hereditary.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)That's the other reason that the neck looks so much worse, physicians haven't really come up with a "neck lift"
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)I grant she has great hair but the discrpency between the deeply damaged skin and the treated skin looks odd.
Iris
(15,657 posts)She has MS. That's hard on the body.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)That can do it.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Off with their heads!!
PD Turk
(1,289 posts)Somebody airbrushed out the fangs.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)hogwyld
(3,436 posts)So she's earned a few wrinkles here and there. She's still an evil, batshit crazy, entitled, throne seeking bitch though.
oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)about wrinkles and imperfect skin? she isn't 22 and we shouldn't judge her by her appearance.
we can, however, judge her by that nasty snarl on her face.
buckyblue
(24 posts)I know- women are supposed to look fuckable until the casket is closed. (sarcasmo)
I thought we were the content of character type people...not the oh look at the 'old' lady type?
loves_dulcinea
(417 posts)11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)and I am 73 and have never had plastic surgery.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)Rather than look just skin-deep, check out her ideas and character. Those are way uglier than a few wrinkles.
Focusing on appearances is a poor excuse for not thinking.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)The discrepancy between this photo and her speaking at the RNC convention is jaw dropping. Mormons aren't allowed to have plastic surgery so the question as to which image is real is justified.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)It was about her wrinkles. There are substantive issues to discuss about. Your post was about her appearance.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)enough
(13,259 posts)This just happens to be an unusually candid shot.
BigDemVoter
(4,150 posts)She's rich as hell, and I'm certain she's had the best cosmetic surgery $$ can buy. Poor thing.
OkieGranny
(73 posts)Maybe that's why she's snarling.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)dynasaw
(998 posts)Wrinkles and aging don't matter. I've known lovely people with wrinkles, bags etc. It's the expression that betrays a mean personality, and that's ugly. I am a great believer in that you can't really be beautify outside if you are not beautiful inside.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)If someone has the idea that beauty can only be associated with youth and/or youthful appearance, I suggest they are missing out on quite a bit that this world has to offer.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)It must be hard for the upper crust to get good help these days.
panader0
(25,816 posts)kidding....
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)Sun damage, low collagen from menopause -- looks right for a woman of her age and lifestyle.
mstinamotorcity2
(1,451 posts)Not before I've had my dinner
BigDemVoter
(4,150 posts)BUT. . . Big difference-- Cookie is cute even when she's angry, whereas Anne Romney. . . oh never mind, I better not go there!
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Grammy23
(5,810 posts)It looks a little bit like this was done to this photo, thus making her skin have a harsher tone and the wrinkles more apparent. Looks like there are freckles on her forehead, too. Or age spots. With make-up those things would be minimized but with the increased saturation would still be visible.
For her age, she looks OK, especially for a woman who has probably spent some time in the sun on their boats and other outdoor equipment. She and I are close to the same age and back when we were teens, we used things like Coppertone Suntan Lotion. It had an SPF factor of about 4 (not kidding). So, like me, she probably had some fairly significant sunburns and is paying for that now. We didn't know nearly as much about the effects of sun on the skin as we do now.
As for her expression, if you snap pictures of anyone talking, you can get some pretty odd pictures since you freeze the mouth in mid-sentence. Some of the pictures of Chris Christie at the Convention during his speech were horrible and it was because of the emphatic way he was speaking and the photos stopped the movement in mid-snarl. Had he known in just a few short months he was going to be the President's BFF, he might not have been so harsh.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)I've been doing retouching lately and it's amazing how much you can improve or wreck someone's looks
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)convention. Can saturation alone make such a dramatic change?
PATXgirl
(192 posts)...a girl's best friend when photoshop or surgery is not an option.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and to me, that's all that matters.
Women have a right to age, and frankly they age more gracefully if they stop trying to look 20 by dressing like, say, biker chic.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Everything else looks normal. She's also not wearing makeup so her skin tone looks different from a lot of her official wife-of-the-candidate appearance photos.
LiberalFighter
(50,928 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,799 posts)Geeze . . . . she's 63. Why are you concerned about her looks?
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)She appears to be in the shade with the light coming from behind her. As such I would not expect her wrinkles to be so clearly defined. However the highlights in her eyes seem to indicate that the light on her face is coming from below which is generally unflattering. For example, they use a lot of bottom lighting in the show Dexter to make him appear more frightening.
If I were to guess, I'd say it appears as if some manipulation to contrast was done in post processing. The vast majority of digital photos are post processed in one way or another, even if the image comes straight out of the camera.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)The difference between this image and her image at the RNC convention is staggering.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)People who are made up for the camera often appear to have way too much make-up on if you see them in person. You can get away with a lot more if the person is to be seen from a distance.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)I think when we see her on interviews and tv the lighting and makeup and all that goop makes her look a lot younger.
Her wrinkles don't bother me at all - but her stone cold heart does.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)The photo is largely backlit, and digital cameras don't do well under those conditions. Plus the pure evil and hatred is coming through; did someone tell her what her husband is?
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Women don't look 20 forever, and that's OK.