Romney Vetoed Flood Coverage In Mass Even After A Flood; Then Was Absent During The Next One
From Alan Colmes' website: http://www.alan.com/2012/10/30/romney-vetoed-flood-coverage-in-mass-even-after-a-flood-then-was-absent-during-the-next-one/
Romney vetoed funds for flood preparations in 2004. In the spring of 2004, Peabody, Mass., got drenched with rain, which flooded the downtown area. After the storm, then-Gov. Mitt Romney asked President George W. Bush to declare Essex, Middlesex and Suffolk Counties federal disaster areas, according to the Boston Globe. That fall, the state legislature proposed spending $5.7 million on a flood prevention project to protect against future floods. Those funds would be matched by $22 million in federal money. Romney vetoed it. This week, Romney has come under fire for suggesting that the federal government get out of the business of disaster relief. But his record in Massachusetts doesn’t lend much support to the suggestion that states can handle it alone.
Esquire remembers what the right-leaning Lowell Sun reported after another flood in 2006? We find it inconceivable that Gov. Mitt Romney claims the state can do nothing to help those residents still struggling to rebuild homes and businesses after the May flood. Massachusetts is sitting on millions in unspent emergency funds from Hurricane Katrina and more than $1 billion in cash reserves, yet Romney has failed to even respond to the Lowell delegation’s requests to discuss additional aid for victims.
= new reply since forum marked as read
sadly.
