Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

shraby

(21,946 posts) Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:30 AM Nov 2012

ROMNEY!! ABOUT THOSE TAX RETURNS..EVER HEAR OF A PLACE WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE? PUT THEM THERE.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ROMNEY!! ABOUT THOSE TAX RETURNS..EVER HEAR OF A PLACE WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE? PUT THEM THERE. (Original Post) shraby Nov 2012 OP

I'd like to see him pull them out of where the sun don't shine. Raine1967 Nov 2012 #1

I thought Bloomberg showed he used the Mormon Church so he didn't have to pay? Barack_America Nov 2012 #2

I thought they were already in that location but who knows for sure. gordianot Nov 2012 #3

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)

1. I'd like to see him pull them out of where the sun don't shine.

Reply to shraby (Original post)

Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:40 AM

Nov 2012

Sunlight is a great disinfectant.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)

2. I thought Bloomberg showed he used the Mormon Church so he didn't have to pay?

Reply to shraby (Original post)

Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:45 AM

Nov 2012

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html

gordianot

(15,238 posts)

3. I thought they were already in that location but who knows for sure.

Reply to shraby (Original post)

Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:49 AM

Nov 2012

When this election is over and he has lost, I hope he and his wife are continually hounded every time they seek publicity. As I am sure the junior clones will try to carry on they need to be hounded for tax returns as well as the source of their wealth. After all they are not yet retired? Surely like Daddy Mitt they built that?

Reply to this discussion