Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:06 AM Nov 2012

The Schmuk Nails It

More on Republican Sandy Worries
by Mark Halperin | November 1, 2012


7:55 a.m. E.T.

From “Morning Joe”:

"Here are the two reasons Republicans are really worried about this. Number one, politicians don’t like uncertainty. There’s a lot of uncertainty on the Republican side. How big a deal will this be? The coverage of the storm is going to carry all the way through the election in the national press and the President has hit every mark. On substance and on stage craft, he’s hit every mark. So, he’s going to blot out a lot of the effort of Republicans to message. The other thing is, what was Mitt Romney’s closing argument? I can work across the aisle. This President has a four year record of failure, doesn’t know how to work with the other side. The symbolism of, with Chris Christie, working across the aisle, getting things done, it goes right to the heart of how Mitt Romney wanted to close this election."


read/watch: http://thepage.time.com/2012/11/01/more-on-republican-sandy-worries/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
1. The President extended his hand over the past few years only to have obstructionists slap it away.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:12 AM
Nov 2012

Perhaps Christie has realized the folly and the danger of McConnell's dangerous political game. McConnell played chicken with history and lost. His day of reckoning will come.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
3. oh yeah, trumad
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:18 AM
Nov 2012

he is a fucking schumk

(I should have put in a disclaimer or something: 'The Schmuk Nails It')

winstars

(4,220 posts)
5. Hey, its one in a row for Halperin...
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:24 AM
Nov 2012

It is funny that he is famous, at least here on DU, for two things:

Calling our President a dick

and

saying "its a good day for John McCain"

Great body of work

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
4. Mark fucktard is only thinking about his journalistic a$$. He knows Mitt is toast and is beginning
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:22 AM
Nov 2012

the process of walking his shilling commentaries back to portray himself as ' objective '...yea, right!

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
6. With Chris Christie out there, working with Obama and getting things done,
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:33 AM
Nov 2012

hopefully others will see the error in their ways and start helping, instead of hindering the country.
Those that don't will be seen in the unemployment line. They have less than a week to get their act together.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
7. It doesn't go to the heart of how Rmoney wanted to close
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:52 AM
Nov 2012

It flies in the face of how Rmoney wanted to close. Also it wasn't that Obama wouldn't work across the aisle, it's that the other side accepted any concession given and then demanded more. Often holding things that the country absolutely needed hostage.

-LOKI -BAD FOR YA

(308 posts)
8. Mark Halperin is trying to make case of mitt losing because of sandy,
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 07:54 AM
Nov 2012

mark is an professional apologizer for the gop,the right uses the uncertainty principle as a lever to get their way,they claim if go into business for yourself,you succeeded inspite of uncertainty ,you can not have it both ways.common gop dissonance distortion .

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
9. And Halperin conveniently ignores the McConnell-Boehner wall of obstruction
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 07:56 AM
Nov 2012

that prevented more of such cooperation for the past four years.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
10. Why did Christie throw Mittens under the bus?
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 08:01 AM
Nov 2012

I'm surprised no one is talking more about this. Before Sandy, I think it was 2 weeks or so ago, Chris Christie was talking about how the President wasn't a leader, he wasn't getting the job done... really talking poorly about the President, following the Teabagger playbook. I think the storm shook Christie but I really think something happened that made him decide to stab Mittens in the back before throwing him under the bus. He could easily tell people that President Obama was doing his job without so much effusive praise.

I want to know what the heck RMoney did to his NJ BFF, for Christie to pretty much abandon his party (as it stands) and risk his chances of reelection, because the 'baggers will remember this.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
11. His constituency was under water, it was an emergency.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 08:04 AM
Nov 2012

Mitt has no authority or power to help the ravaged state. Obama is president.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
12. I think there's more to it than that.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 09:30 AM
Nov 2012

He's obviously playing politics with the President and not just to get the help that he would've gotten otherwise. There's, IMO, something more going on here. I think the Romney camp did something to piss him off in regards to the hurricane,

onethatcares

(16,168 posts)
13. maybe when the master plan was laid out
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 09:35 AM
Nov 2012

as to how the privatization would work no one ever forsaw New York/New Jersey of all places getting hit by a major storm catastrophe.

they might have been thinking about how to carve up the tax dollars among themselves and now Christie sees it just doesn't work that way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Schmuk Nails It