Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just Think Of The Consequences If Disaster Relief Were All "Faith Based" And Funds Were Block --- (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Oct 2012 OP
This OffWithTheirHeads Oct 2012 #1
boxes of expired mac & cheese and cans of 5 year old cranberry sauce for all! corkhead Oct 2012 #2
Does that mean AsahinaKimi Oct 2012 #4
You know, some people actually LIKE fruitcake .. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2012 #11
Only those who tithed would get help from the church to which they gave. liberal N proud Oct 2012 #3
Been to numerous disaster areas and have never seen this pipoman Oct 2012 #8
My husband tithes - and his church is old and $30k in debt. They couldn't help anybody. People patricia92243 Oct 2012 #13
I just heard the NEW York Red Cross CEO saying that there is no way malaise Oct 2012 #5
They need the governments AND pipoman Oct 2012 #10
Bibles when you lose your house get the red out Oct 2012 #6
They'd decide whom they thought was worthy of help and who wasn't gollygee Oct 2012 #7
Guess you've never been to a disaster zone pipoman Oct 2012 #9
I know how the Salvation Army operates gollygee Oct 2012 #12
Ditto malaise Oct 2012 #14
"Nothing to stop" and actually denying aid are 2 different things.. pipoman Oct 2012 #15

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
4. Does that mean
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 07:23 AM
Oct 2012

People would have to eat those 100 year old fruit cakes that get sent around every Christmas, that never get eaten? ( I truly think
those will be the very items that start the zombie apocalypse.)

liberal N proud

(60,346 posts)
3. Only those who tithed would get help from the church to which they gave.
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 07:22 AM
Oct 2012

And it would be proportional.

The real failure to that system comes when the churches suffer loss as well. Lose the church, lose the assistance.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
8. Been to numerous disaster areas and have never seen this
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 08:02 AM
Oct 2012

I have seen Mennonite Relief and Baptists right next to each other working together to provide help to disaster victims. Catholics working with Methodists without ever knowing the religious beliefs of anyone they are helping. Most of these denominational relief orgs have people who are from all over the country who converge on disaster areas wherever they arise. During NOLA IIRC faith based aid accounted for over half of the immediate disaster relief...people love to hate religious groups in these parts, doubt the outspoken would turn down hot food, drinking water and warm clothes regardless the source if they themselves were disaster victims..

patricia92243

(12,604 posts)
13. My husband tithes - and his church is old and $30k in debt. They couldn't help anybody. People
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 08:26 AM
Oct 2012

just don't go to church anymore - like they did in the time of Romney - the 1800's.

malaise

(269,201 posts)
5. I just heard the NEW York Red Cross CEO saying that there is no way
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 07:29 AM
Oct 2012

they could provide what's needed after a disaster of this magnitude and that they need the governments - federal, state and local.

Fuck everyone who thinks otherwise - greedy fucking assholes.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
10. They need the governments AND
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 08:07 AM
Oct 2012

the armies of faith based aid services who are already there and coming.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
7. They'd decide whom they thought was worthy of help and who wasn't
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 07:45 AM
Oct 2012

and I'm sure we can all guess whom they would feel was worthy and what groups wouldn't get any help, and would be called moochers anyway.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
9. Guess you've never been to a disaster zone
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 08:05 AM
Oct 2012

and seen the disaster relief groups helping the victims...just easier to allow your prejudices to run away with your imagination, eh?

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
12. I know how the Salvation Army operates
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 08:14 AM
Oct 2012

and that they deny aid to groups they don't like, and there's nothing to stop any faith-based group from doing the same. Obviously, not all groups deny help, but I don't want people to wonder if the group that shows up to help them is going to help them or not.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
15. "Nothing to stop" and actually denying aid are 2 different things..
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 09:28 AM
Oct 2012

The idea in the OP will never happen...with that in mind, you can choose who you give to. " I don't want people to wonder if the group that shows up to help them is going to help them or not." It isn't like government aid is without strings. They record the personal information of those who receive aid. If you happen to owe back taxes, no aid. If you receive government aid, expect a form 1099 (or the equivalent) for the dollar value you received...wouldn't want anyone to escape paying taxes on their enrichment.

No, in disaster zones people don't have ID and they aren't asked by most of the faith based aid services (any that I have ever seen who are supplying basic, immediate needs). Often the workers scarcely have time to look up to see the face of the person they are helping. People in disaster zones certainly aren't obligated to accept aid or assistance from these groups...in my experience few turn it down when offered regardless the org offering the aid.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just Think Of The Consequ...