General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is the Gallup Poll so at odds with other polls??
The latest Gallup poll says Romney is ahead by 5 points in a nationwide poll of "Likely Voters" - something like 50% to 45%. How do they get those numbers?
Do they poll cell phones? Do they poll door to door? Do they call people that haven't yet voted? Or is it at random?
Either way, I have my doubts about their process. At one time, they were a well-respected polling organization. If they are off this much from everyone else, they could lose all credibility, if they are wrong?
From what I have seen and read, President Obama has been leading in almost all the early voting. In some cases, by large margins. This is a great start if we can get people to the polls a week from this Tuesday?
My suggestion is that we ignore these polls. All of them. We should simply focus on getting out the vote, right up until and including election day. We should stay positive and smile every time you pass a Republican. It will drive them crazy.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)That's all you need to know.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)BlueState
(642 posts)He demonstrates that in the past they have been inaccurate.
His conclusion is that it is their methodology. Specifically the likely cause is their methodology in determine who is likely to vote.
It's a good read for anyone (probably alot of us here) who have become addicted to polls. It might be wise to
avoid them until the election as you recommend but I doubt I will be able to.
It would seem Gallup and Rasmussen were close on forecasting turnout in previous elections, and for this election the numbers don't look good for Obama.
I do take this with a grain of salt, considering they have both been leading shamelessly to the right in their polling.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Even when they've been called on it. They refuse to change it
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)and have, apparently, never seen this topic discussed here. I've seen at least ten posts like this in the last week.
kentuck
(111,107 posts)I haven't been able to spend as much time as I normally do.
timlot
(456 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)2008 marked a watershed because during that election cellphones were becoming popular. Cellphones are even more prevalent today morphed into smartphones that email and surf the web. The groups supporting Obama do most of their computing and communication over smartphones, Gallop is not reaching that demographic.
tritsofme
(17,394 posts)nevergiveup
(4,763 posts)24 hours before the polls open. They are a major player in the "horse-race" hype that is permeating the press.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)in seeing Romney elected and are doing their part to help him steal the election. Just look who owns Gallup and what they do.
http://sri-2000.com/company.html
Selection Research International, Inc. (SRI)
Selection Research International, Inc. (SRI) specializes in evaluating employees and their families for international assignments and building global talent development systems.
<snip>
For maximum effectiveness, assessing employees and their families for international assignment should be integrated into a larger global talent development system. SRI begins all new engagements with a one-day working session, structured to integrate SRI tools and processes into existing and planned talent management programs of the corporation.
Bet Romney already supplies them with a ton of business.
Bucky
(54,041 posts)And give the Anti-Concern Troll Counterterrorism squad something to kvetch about.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)You have my unflagging admiration.
Seriously, and you know what I'm talking about. You should really receive an award. What you've managed over ten plus years is an astounding achievement.
InsultComicDog
(1,209 posts)kentuck
(111,107 posts)What does it mean??
InsultComicDog
(1,209 posts)the amount of points off of the average, on average, that each pollster is, ordered from most pro-Obama to most pro-Romney.
0rganism
(23,962 posts)it's not like there's a pure reservoir of "likely voters" for Gallup to poll. rather, they're mixed in with the registered voters, and the pollsters have to figure out "likely" from self-reported demographic and historical information. If a certain set of criteria are satisfied, the respondent is ranked as a "likely voter". Frequent deviations from the rest of the polls probably stem from differences in this set of criteria, plus whatever other weighting factors the nice folks at Gallup saw fit to apply to the responses.