Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,079 posts)
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 03:59 PM Oct 2012

G.O.P. Split Over Whether to Emphasize Misogyny or Racism



October 26, 2012
G.O.P. Split Over Whether to Emphasize Misogyny or Racism


NEW HAMPSHIRE —With less than two weeks to go until Election Day, there is a deep divide among Republican leaders over whether to emphasize misogyny or racism as the campaign’s closing theme.

In one camp is the Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock, who says that his view that God is sometimes O.K. with rape is “gaining real traction with a key demographic: men who don’t like women very much.”

“I can’t tell you how many misogynists have come up to me at my rallies and said, ‘Thank you for saying what you said,’ ” he told reporters today. “I think they’re like, finally, someone’s taking a more nuanced position on rape.”

But in the other camp is the former New Hampshire governor John Sununu, who worries that the Republican Party’s emphasis on misogyny is threatening to drown out its “winning message of racism.”

“I understand the appeal of Mourdock’s anti-woman theme, but I worry that it’s going to overshadow our core value of racism, which is still our best shot at winning this thing,” he said. “In politics, you’ve got to dance with the one who brung you.”

Hoping to heal a possible rift with so little time left until Election Day, the R.N.C. chairman Reince Priebus said today that there is room for both views in today’s Republican Party: “Our ‘big tent’ message to voters should be this: come for the misogyny, stay for the racism.”

























http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2012/10/gop-split-over-whether-to-emphasize-misogyny-or-racism.html
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ruffburr

(1,190 posts)
4. This is_
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 04:21 PM
Oct 2012

Hilarious, You gotta know what with all the wingnut comments from old retired KKK members etc. ( i'm waiting for them to bring Jesse Helms back from the grave) They are showing FEAR FREAKING OUT and SCREAMING INCOHERENTLY Seems to me they know their LOSING!!! I must say the show and diatribe while humorous is getting quite stale!! They are so limited that they've run out of subjects ,

Johonny

(20,872 posts)
6. So we can look forward to them smearing Michelle Obama more
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 04:25 PM
Oct 2012

as it kills two birds with one hateful stone

Cha

(297,503 posts)
8. GOPers are doing a bang up Job of emphasizing both Racism
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 04:40 PM
Oct 2012

and misogyny. Look at their spokesmen.. Sununu, Mourdock, Akin, and all the other dipshits from the last century or is that the neanderthal era?

part man all 86

(367 posts)
11. So many voters to disenfranchised from President Obama and so little time to it.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 05:14 PM
Oct 2012

Don't you feel the love from the white privilege party.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
14. The sexual assault...aka rape card is the default. It's Politically Correct for RWCFs.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 11:04 PM
Oct 2012

Even the Dems/Left/Liberals miss it, IMHO. It's the Dog Whistle that is "Lookee Here, Y'all." No misogyny or race.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»G.O.P. Split Over Whether...