Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 07:12 PM Oct 2012

Boston Globe: Romney vouched for low price on Staples stock

http://bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2012/10/25/mitt-romney-vouched-for-low-price-staples-stock-that-traded-times-higher-year-later/zO60zp3qcdviHqvHZ2pDpJ/story.html

CANTON, Mass. — Mitt Romney testified under oath in 1991 that the ex-wife of Staples founder Tom Stemberg got a fair deal in the couple’s 1988 divorce, even though the company shares Maureen Sullivan Stemberg received were valued at a tenth of Staples’ stock price on the day of its initial public offering only a year later.

At the time the Stembergs split, Romney suggested, there was little indication that Staples’ value would soon skyrocket.

(snip)

But on April 28, 1989, barely a year after Sullivan Stemberg sold more than half of her shares on the premise that they were worth less than $2.50 apiece, the company made its initial public offering at $19 per share and ended its first day at $22.50.

The closing price made Staples, which operated 23 stores at the time, worth more than $200 million. Stemberg, holding 567,000 shares, claimed $12.8 million in company stock.

Sullivan Stemberg’s 245,000 remaining shares were worth $5.5 million, but she had lost out on millions more by accepting low sale prices in 1988.

(end snip)

The article talks about the argument over the gag order. The judge only told her it would take a separate motion. She said she would file one. The RW noise machine took this to mean she was "shut down'. Au contraire, Faux Snooze.

Swiss Mitt described Staples as "dysfunctional at the time — a place with “surly” employees and slow checkout times"
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boston Globe: Romney vouched for low price on Staples stock (Original Post) deminks Oct 2012 OP
Quick tbennett76 Oct 2012 #1
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2012 #2
This might not put him in jail ItsTheMediaStupid Oct 2012 #3
So is this still considered perjury or has it moved into different territory? nc4bo Oct 2012 #4
With adequate evidence, I'd say both ItsTheMediaStupid Oct 2012 #5
bet he undervalued it JUST LIKE HE DID TO THE IRS elehhhhna Oct 2012 #6
k+r! TeamPooka Oct 2012 #7
K & R Wednesdays Oct 2012 #8
If she held on to that stock not only would she have had a hell of a lot more money, more avaistheone1 Oct 2012 #9
K&R amborin Oct 2012 #10
Bain Shorted the Wellstone ruled Oct 2012 #11
read pgs 74 & 75 mercuryblues Oct 2012 #12
Read pgs 74 & 75 of what? avaistheone1 Oct 2012 #13
the link in the OP. mercuryblues Oct 2012 #14
 

tbennett76

(223 posts)
1. Quick
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 07:23 PM
Oct 2012

who can get an investor prospectus showing Bain's opinion of Staples from that era? If it conflicts, it pretty much shows Romney invented a new class of transfer stock specifically to screw Maureen.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
4. So is this still considered perjury or has it moved into different territory?
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 07:28 PM
Oct 2012

Like fraud?

#MittLIES.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
6. bet he undervalued it JUST LIKE HE DID TO THE IRS
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 07:30 PM
Oct 2012

when he put the magically multiplying IRA contributions in there. That's how he has a 100 million dollar "IRA".

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
9. If she held on to that stock not only would she have had a hell of a lot more money, more
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 08:00 PM
Oct 2012

importantly as a major stock holder she could have influenced the direction of the Staples Corporation.

I think BOTH Mitt Romney and her husband wanted her to sell those shares ASAP so that she would have no or little control of Staples. AND I think that was not only helpful to her husband's own purposes, but to Mitt Romney's purposes as Mr. Stemberg is Mitt's friend, Mitt's business partner and Mitt's benefactor.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
11. Bain Shorted the
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 08:12 PM
Oct 2012

shit out of this stock. This is their MO,did the same damn thing to a company our family had a large holding in. This is perfectly legal,rig stock bidding on the ask and bid side. This crap is happening every day in America. Why do think SEC is interested in rig bids for companies. Watch the big suit in Boston,going on since 2007.

mercuryblues

(14,532 posts)
14. the link in the OP.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 01:36 PM
Oct 2012

There is a difference in the pricing of the shares.

Common shares were valued at 1.50 to 2.90. rMoney valued Tom's shares at 10 cents because rMoney said they were "restricted" which made them basically worthless - "no one would want to buy them"

As the article points out she sold her shares, but they do not say if they were Tom's restricted shares or if she recieved the common shares in the settlement. Either way she was embezzled because of his testimony. It is just a matter of how much.


oops sorry. I thought this was the thread with the link to the testimony. Here it is:

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/1025_romney_2.pdf

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boston Globe: Romney vou...