General Discussion

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts) Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:04 PM Oct 2012

Some friends and I had fun with this on Facebook . . .

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Some friends and I had fun with this on Facebook . . . (Original Post) markpkessinger Oct 2012 OP

Funny! n/t Fridays Child Oct 2012 #1

Your eyes must be a helluva ohheckyeah Oct 2012 #6

ha ha, I can't see it either. hollysmom Oct 2012 #7

I couldn't have seen that when I was 18. :-) ohheckyeah Oct 2012 #9

me, too, been wearing glasses for the last year when I noticed I was missing things others saw. hollysmom Oct 2012 #10

I've been wearing contacts or glasses since I was 13 ohheckyeah Oct 2012 #11

Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #2

No one ever claimed they were obsolete. Just that there are fewer of them in use today. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #5

Thanks for the info .99center Oct 2012 #8

Were in serious trouble .99center Oct 2012 #3

Very funny Dman292 Oct 2012 #4

ha! IVoteDFL Oct 2012 #12

Fridays Child

(23,998 posts)

1. Funny! n/t

Reply to markpkessinger (Original post)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:07 PM

Oct 2012

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)

6. Your eyes must be a helluva

Reply to Fridays Child (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:35 PM

Oct 2012

a lot better than mine.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)

7. ha ha, I can't see it either.

Reply to ohheckyeah (Reply #6)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:54 PM

Oct 2012

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)

9. I couldn't have seen that when I was 18. :-)

Reply to hollysmom (Reply #7)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:12 AM

Oct 2012

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)

10. me, too, been wearing glasses for the last year when I noticed I was missing things others saw.

Reply to ohheckyeah (Reply #9)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:49 AM

Oct 2012

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)

11. I've been wearing contacts or glasses since I was 13

Reply to hollysmom (Reply #10)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:56 AM

Oct 2012

for nearsightedness. Fortunately I don't need glasses for close up reading yet.

Response to markpkessinger (Original post)

Post removed

Indpndnt

(2,391 posts)

5. No one ever claimed they were obsolete. Just that there are fewer of them in use today.

Reply to Post removed (Reply #2)

Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:34 PM

Oct 2012

Especially for their original, critical purposes in 1916. And it was nuclear subs mentioned by the President, not just subs.

But I guess comprehension isn't high on your list, right? Enjoy your brief stay.

.99center

(1,237 posts)

8. Thanks for the info

Reply to Post removed (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 12:02 AM

Oct 2012

It reinforces President Obama's point about wasteful spending in the military. Why the hell do we need 195,334 bayonets for 20,000-30,000 deployed Marines? I don't recall him saying they're obsolete, I must of missed the fox version of the debate. My damn lying ears and brain, if I didn't have Fox I wouldn't know which voice in my head I should listen to.