Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maxsolomon

(33,400 posts)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 06:23 PM Oct 2012

Note: Mourdock's Democratic opponent is also Anti-Choice

Jim Donnelly: "I believe human life is sacred and I value it in all its forms. That is why I oppose abortion and believe that government policies should encourage life and make it easier for parents to adopt children."

Don't get too excited about flipping Lugar's seat.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Note: Mourdock's Democratic opponent is also Anti-Choice (Original Post) maxsolomon Oct 2012 OP
That's too bad, but it's better than a republican teabagger. demosincebirth Oct 2012 #1
Not if there are no exceptions for rape or incest. They would then be equally bad, and how could still_one Oct 2012 #4
The question is to what degree? For rape and incest and life of the mother? If it is exactly the still_one Oct 2012 #2
Yeah, but does he believe that rape is ordained by God? Zen Democrat Oct 2012 #3
Donnelly is fighting uphill in a very red state. aaaaaa5a Oct 2012 #5
A lot of "democrats" think women's rights are negotiable. LeftyMom Oct 2012 #6
Numbers are all that matter RomneyLies Oct 2012 #7
sorry, not if he has an identical position, then his opponent is a POS also. still_one Oct 2012 #8
Bullshit RomneyLies Oct 2012 #9
moot issue, his Democratic opponent is for the exceptions. still_one Oct 2012 #11
Donnelly also opposes abortion rights but favors exceptions for rape, Contrary1 Oct 2012 #10
Then that is a major difference. Thank-you. Even though I may disagree with his choice position, still_one Oct 2012 #12
Well, all you single issue folks, enjoy. nt Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2012 #13
In this case Donnely believes in exceptions for rape and incest. However, if he didn't it is not still_one Oct 2012 #16
But he doesn't think that having a rapist's baby is a "gift from god." LisaL Oct 2012 #14
Biden says he's against abortion for religious reasons, but won't impose those on others. porphyrian Oct 2012 #15

still_one

(92,403 posts)
4. Not if there are no exceptions for rape or incest. They would then be equally bad, and how could
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 06:36 PM
Oct 2012

Anyone in good conscious support someone who believes a woman who was raped must carry to term? I do not care if they have a D after there name, that,is garbage

If those are both candidates position without exceptions they are both anti- women

A Democrat must stand for at the very minimum exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the Mother, or they can go to hell to in my book

still_one

(92,403 posts)
2. The question is to what degree? For rape and incest and life of the mother? If it is exactly the
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 06:32 PM
Oct 2012

Same then in my view both believe women are inferior, and in good conscience if I lived in that state I would not vote for either candidate.

However, if he at least holds those exceptions, while not ideal, do differentiate him enough that the Democrat should be voted for

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
5. Donnelly is fighting uphill in a very red state.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 06:37 PM
Oct 2012

I say let him do what he has to do to get elected. The alternative is much worse.


Remember he will caucus with Dems. That keeps Mitch McConnell from being majority leader. That's a good enough reason to support him to me!



We need a big tent if we want to be a majority party.



Believe me, seeing Dick Lugar's old seat potentially go to a Dem is a big deal. Its like when Brown stole Kennedy's seat in 2010, only this time we have the advantage.


Lugar was untouchable here for nearly all of my life.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
6. A lot of "democrats" think women's rights are negotiable.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 06:39 PM
Oct 2012

Some of them will post on this thread. *sigh*

still_one

(92,403 posts)
12. Then that is a major difference. Thank-you. Even though I may disagree with his choice position,
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:06 PM
Oct 2012

at least I could accept those exceptions.


Anyone who would force a women who has been raped to carry to term is not part of a civilized society

still_one

(92,403 posts)
16. In this case Donnely believes in exceptions for rape and incest. However, if he didn't it is not
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:11 PM
Oct 2012

just a single issue. It is as abhorent as racism. To force a women who has been raped to carry to term is contemptible on many levels

 

porphyrian

(18,530 posts)
15. Biden says he's against abortion for religious reasons, but won't impose those on others.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:09 PM
Oct 2012

Saying that "government policies should encourage life and make it easier to adopt children" is not the same as saying "make abortion illegal."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Note: Mourdock's Democrat...