Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

defacto7

(13,485 posts) Mon Oct 22, 2012, 11:30 PM Oct 2012

6

For me, it all boiled down to

Obama = facts, specific points, delivered as a statesman

Romney = empty promises, empty words, pointless

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For me, it all boiled down to (Original Post) defacto7 Oct 2012 OP

Romney = parrot Avalux Oct 2012 #1

I kept hoping someone would ask Romney if he was running for king of Narnia. dimbear Oct 2012 #2

Romney is loaded with empty promises. His sweat filled answers were pathetic, lumpy Oct 2012 #3

Romney = word salad reusrename Oct 2012 #4

The only thing Lurch proved to me is that he could count to five. OffWithTheirHeads Oct 2012 #5

Avalux

(35,015 posts)

1. Romney = parrot

Reply to defacto7 (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 11:32 PM

Oct 2012

He repeated Obama because he knows NOTHING.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)

2. I kept hoping someone would ask Romney if he was running for king of Narnia.

Reply to defacto7 (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 11:33 PM

Oct 2012

wishins ain't gettins

lumpy

(13,704 posts)

3. Romney is loaded with empty promises. His sweat filled answers were pathetic,

Reply to defacto7 (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 11:35 PM

Oct 2012

that is when he evaded the questions,of course. The man is puffed up with a helluva' lot of empty rhetoric like a can full of marbles.

reusrename

(1,716 posts)

4. Romney = word salad

Reply to defacto7 (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 11:37 PM

Oct 2012

He sounded desperate. That'll be sure to turn off women voters. (I hope that doesn't sound too chauvenist.)

OffWithTheirHeads

(10,337 posts)

5. The only thing Lurch proved to me is that he could count to five.

Reply to defacto7 (Original post)

Mon Oct 22, 2012, 11:46 PM

Oct 2012

Point number one...
Point number two...
All the way to #5...over and over again.

It was the attempted re-hash of the first debate where he just spewed sooo much shit on the floor that answering him was not possible. Only this time it did'nt work.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For me, it all boiled dow...