Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMarco Rubio Helps Demonstrate that the GOP Simply Opposes Paying Women Fairly
...Rubio clearly believes women should be paid less than their male counterparts, at least if the boss wants to pay them less. How do I know this? Because he believes every avenue to fix the problem should be eliminated. This is apparently the standard position throughout the GOP: Cluck your tongue over the evils of discrimination, and turn around and defend it at every turn. They want to destroy collective bargaining rights. They oppose any government regulation that would help ensure equal pay. Oh yeah, and they dont think you should have the right to sue, either. If asking nicely worked, theyd probably find some bullshit reason to be against that, too.
Part of this is clearly just the larger Republican belief that employees should be considered the property of their employers. But its worth noting that they try to expand employer power over your life by attacking womens rights. Opposing equal pay gives them an excellent opportunity to build the case in the publics mind that theres some principle behind, oh, opposing the right of an employee to sue an employer. Opposing mandatory insurance coverage for contraception helps them establish the principle that an employer has a right to exert control over your private life, in this case by docking your compensation package to punish you for having sex they dont approve of. Using misogyny as the lever to pull in this situation is kind of brilliant. They cant win elections strictly by getting the votes of people who arent paid employees. But if their arguments about giving employers control over the lives of their employees are framed as a wink-wink-nudge-nudge attack on womens rightswhich they are!they can get people to vote away their rights by viewing it as an attack on that hated feminism. And yes, I said people deliberately, because unfortunately there are a lot of women who, for diverse reasons, oppose womens rights. Some live in conservative communities and feel that if theyre going to be treated like members of the servant class their whole lives, theyre going to make sure that every other woman in the country is, too. And some, like the female Republicans in Congress whose access to fair pay is guaranteed by their position, are just pulling up the ladder.
There is no reason to oppose Lilly Ledbetter unless you either believe women are inherently inferior or you believe employers should have absolute control over their employeesor some combination of the two. Its very simple legislation that expands the window of opportunity for a woman who discovers shes been discriminated against to sue, nothing more. Considering that the Republican opposition to trial lawyers somehow doesnt apply if theyre being hired to, oh, push forward a truly bullshit claim of being the victim of reverse racism, its clear that the only principles in action are a belief that women are inherently inferior and a belief that employers should be able to treat their employees however they wish.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/22/marco-rubio-helps-demonstrate-that-the-gop-simply-opposes-paying-women-fairly/
Part of this is clearly just the larger Republican belief that employees should be considered the property of their employers. But its worth noting that they try to expand employer power over your life by attacking womens rights. Opposing equal pay gives them an excellent opportunity to build the case in the publics mind that theres some principle behind, oh, opposing the right of an employee to sue an employer. Opposing mandatory insurance coverage for contraception helps them establish the principle that an employer has a right to exert control over your private life, in this case by docking your compensation package to punish you for having sex they dont approve of. Using misogyny as the lever to pull in this situation is kind of brilliant. They cant win elections strictly by getting the votes of people who arent paid employees. But if their arguments about giving employers control over the lives of their employees are framed as a wink-wink-nudge-nudge attack on womens rightswhich they are!they can get people to vote away their rights by viewing it as an attack on that hated feminism. And yes, I said people deliberately, because unfortunately there are a lot of women who, for diverse reasons, oppose womens rights. Some live in conservative communities and feel that if theyre going to be treated like members of the servant class their whole lives, theyre going to make sure that every other woman in the country is, too. And some, like the female Republicans in Congress whose access to fair pay is guaranteed by their position, are just pulling up the ladder.
There is no reason to oppose Lilly Ledbetter unless you either believe women are inherently inferior or you believe employers should have absolute control over their employeesor some combination of the two. Its very simple legislation that expands the window of opportunity for a woman who discovers shes been discriminated against to sue, nothing more. Considering that the Republican opposition to trial lawyers somehow doesnt apply if theyre being hired to, oh, push forward a truly bullshit claim of being the victim of reverse racism, its clear that the only principles in action are a belief that women are inherently inferior and a belief that employers should be able to treat their employees however they wish.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/22/marco-rubio-helps-demonstrate-that-the-gop-simply-opposes-paying-women-fairly/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 473 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post