Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe New Republic: Mitt the Jerk: a Woman’s View of the Debate
By Amy Sullivan
Mitt the Jerk: a Womans View of the Debate
At the risk of going all Maureen Dowd here, Id like to suggest that in the second presidential debate on Tuesday night, we met Mitt the Man. Hes always been there, surfacing briefly at the Republican National Convention to implausibly claim that he has always believed wife Anns job raising their sons was a lot more important than mineas if Romney sincerely believed that for decades he pursued a less important career path. For the most part, however, Mitt the Man had been under wraps until he emerged in full-force at Hofstra University. Just who is he?
Mitt the Man gets his way by talking over you and not stopping until you give in so he can make his point. Which he may have forgotten by then, because getting his way was the point.
Mitt the Man can go from charming to testy in two seconds flat because while he has tolerated you as a female colleague, he will not allow you to disrespect him and his authoritah!
Mitt the Man is not self-aware enough to realize that he can be easily goaded and that you are pushing his buttons.
Mitt the Man feels sorry for you as a single parent and your sure-to-be-screwed-up kids.
Mitt the Man cannot help but disappoint you because his chivalry is all about saying the right thing as opposed to doing the right thing.
http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/108711/mitt-the-jerk
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 834 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New Republic: Mitt the Jerk: a Woman’s View of the Debate (Original Post)
lunatica
Oct 2012
OP
I just saw a pro-Mitt ad on Melissa Harris Perry and in the ad he approves
justiceischeap
Oct 2012
#3
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)1. I amy be mistaken; but ...
didn't a DUer post a nearly identical, though somewhat shorter, OP?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)2. I don't know, thus explaining why I posted it
Let it sink then.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)3. I just saw a pro-Mitt ad on Melissa Harris Perry and in the ad he approves
the voice over at one point says:
"we need to take care of those who can't take care of themselves, like single mothers..."
He really doesn't "get" women... at all. Single mother's are not only taking care of themselves but their children as well. It's a condescending statement hoping to garner the votes of single mothers and women in general but it really just insults us.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)4. And yet even though he won't say if he supports the Lillie Leadbetter Act
in his case I would say that what he doesn't say speaks volumes.
The way he twisted his tongue into a pretzel avoiding answering whether he supported the Act or not just shows how insulting he is to women, by blaming single mothers for the crime in the US.