Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReuters: Mormon Feminists? Yes They Exist, and They're For Obama
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE89I05220121019Mormon feminists? Yes they exist, and they're for Obama
SAN FRANCISCO | Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:08pm EDT
By Peter Henderson
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - One group was not surprised to hear Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney's comments about "binders of women" at the presidential debate this week - Mormon feminists.
- snip -
Aimee Hickman, co-editor of the Mormon feminist magazine Exponent II, said Romney's remarks in which he said he looked at "binders full of women" while searching for staff as governor of Massachusetts suggested he was comfortable having powerful women around him, even if he put it awkwardly.
Yet when he then described setting up a flexible schedule for a senior aide so that she could go home and make dinner for her family, he was speaking in the church's paternalistic language that casts women ultimately as mothers, she said.
"The emphasis on them (women) being seen as leaders or them being seen as breadwinners is still really missing from our rhetoric," Hickman said. Romney's response put that "on full display," she added.
MORE
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1319 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reuters: Mormon Feminists? Yes They Exist, and They're For Obama (Original Post)
Hissyspit
Oct 2012
OP
Mormons don't suffer freethinkers lightly so if they come out publicly for Obama they will...
hrmjustin
Oct 2012
#1
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)1. Mormons don't suffer freethinkers lightly so if they come out publicly for Obama they will...
... punish them. It won't be right away, but it will happen.
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)2. I hope they are not using their real names
That paternalistic church hates women who think for themselves.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)5. They hate anyone who thinks for themselves. There was a frontline special on Mormonism...
... a couple of years back, and they showed how easily these people excommunicate their members who cross any line that they set for their members. i remember one of their elders said that intellectuals were not welcome, because they ask questions. Questions lead to doubt, and doubt leads to loss of faith. Not my cup of tea I will tell you.
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)6. Scary. And sad.
I can't imagine growing up in that sort of world. I pity their children.
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)3. A good VF article that touched on Mitt's brush with Mormon feminists here:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202
Scroll down to about 2/3 down page 2 - - -
<snip>
and then there's this:
So you see, Queen Ann gets irritated with liberal Mormons. Think about how she must feel about the rest of us.
The article goes on to tell how Romney came into the home of a church member to tell her he, as the leader of the church, had decided that she should give away her baby for adoption, even though she was not looking to do any thing of the kind and had no plans to relinquish her child.
Scroll down to about 2/3 down page 2 - - -
In the spring of 1993, Helen Claire Sievers performed a bit of shuttle diplomacy to resolve a thorny problem confronting church leaders in Boston: resentment among progressive Mormon women at their subservient status within the church.
<snip>
Romney wasnt sure about holding such a meeting, but he ultimately agreed to it. Sievers went back to the Exponent II group and said they should be realistic and not demand things Romney could never deliver, such as allowing women to hold the priesthood. On the day of the meeting, about 250 women filled the pews of the Belmont Chapel. After an opening song, prayer, and some housekeeping items, the floor was open. Women began proposing changes that would include them more in the life of the church. In the end, the group came up with some 70 suggestionsfrom letting women speak after men in church to putting changing tables in mens bathroomsas Romney and one of his counselors listened and took careful notes.
and then there's this:
(Ann Romney was not considered to be sympathetic to the agitation of liberal women within the stake. She was invited to social events sponsored by Exponent II but did not attend. She was, in the words of one member, understood to be not that kind of woman.)
So you see, Queen Ann gets irritated with liberal Mormons. Think about how she must feel about the rest of us.
The article goes on to tell how Romney came into the home of a church member to tell her he, as the leader of the church, had decided that she should give away her baby for adoption, even though she was not looking to do any thing of the kind and had no plans to relinquish her child.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)4. 2 Words: Sonia Johnson
Any discussion of Mormon feminists must include Sonia Johnson, who was excommunicated from the Mormon church: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Johnson