General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalifornia city bans smoking in duplexes and other multi-family homes
California city bans smoking in duplexes and other multi-family homes
SAN RAFAEL, Calif. - A San Francisco suburb on Monday banned smoking in duplexes, condominiums and other multi-family homes, with city leaders saying they hoped to lead a wave of such regulations across California and ultimately the country.
The City Council in San Rafael, a community of 57,000 people about 15 miles north of San Francisco, voted unanimously for the ban, following a handful of other California municipalities that have outlawed smoking in buildings with as few as two units.
"We are happy to blaze a trail," Mayor Gary Phillips said before the vote. "We're most happy to be in the forefront of the issue because we think it will greatly benefit our residents and those visiting San Rafael, and we think it will set the tone for other cities as well."
Tobacco-control experts predicted that the tough smoking ordinance in San Rafael could touch off a larger movement in other states and cities.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/16/14480203-california-city-bans-smoking-in-duplexes-and-other-multi-family-homes
The wealthy won't need to worry about this.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)It's been months, way long overdue!!!!
You're right, it has been awhile.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)People LOVE to make it about smoking, like saying abortion is about population control....when it is about a person's right to choose.
But carry on and miss the point about liberties, your body, your choice etc....but if they choose to ban abortion here in Ohio don't expect me to vote against the ban because what I have learned is that choice is something we want the government to control and people should be forced to live and act like our rulers tell us to.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)...because of my chain-smoking neighbor.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)They probably pollute more than the smoking guy.
Seriously, I'm not trying to pooh-pooh your child's condition, but there are a lot worse things in our environment than cigarette smoking.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Smoking is an addiction.
The only way to combat it is healthcare.
And it's extensive. Most smokers go from smoking to obesity.
Please, get off your high horse... um.. your dancing horse and realize that you're punishing the wrong people.
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)It really makes your case, so well!
.
.
.
.
.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)And cigarette smoking is the hardest addiction to beat.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And, even if you're correct, what accounts for the high levels of cancer in areas near polluting manufacturing plants and homes near electrical towers?
I'm not saying that the poster's concerns aren't real and that her child does not suffer from asthma. What I'm saying is that cigarette smoke, alone, isn't as big of a deal as many other pollutants in our air. To focus on only one small, usually passing (not so much in this case), cause of irritants is absurd.
And, as you've pointed out, smoking is an addiction in most cases and these people should have SOMEWHERE safe to smoke.
Thegonagle
(806 posts)But California was on the forefront of fixing that, too.
Now, I do see the point that it should be up to the landlord to decide, but I also see limiting the stinky things in multi-family housing. Smokers, go outside, please!
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Occulus
(20,599 posts)Nonsmokers told everyone that this would never ever happen.
Surprise, they lied.
Knock me over with a feather.
abumbyanyothername
(2,711 posts)These regulations pass because of second hand smoke.
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And don't tell me they should quit. If they're too poor to own their own home, chances are they don't have medical coverage that will cover that addiction.
Hell, most insurance won't cover it now, anyway, despite your plan.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Not all of the wealthy live in Rmoney mansions.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)if you don't think this will hurt the middle class and poor the most. The wealthy can move anywhere - and certainly into a one family home. Just another slam against those with the least. As far as I'm concerned, it's just another reason to not live in nanny state California.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Big tobacco hurts them the most.
Health-wise and pocketbook-wise.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Seriously? I can only imagine what cigarettes cost in CA since their around $14 a pack here in NYC - if that hasn't made them quit, neither will this.
REP
(21,691 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)But most poor people don't even live in that.
raccoon
(31,119 posts)would be hard to enforce.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)through thick clouds to get anywhere.
If multifamily construction didn't have gaping holes throughout (from plumbing etc) that allowed smoke to flow between units this wouldn't be an issue. I have a downstairs neighbor and every time they light up (only about 30 times a day) the smoke makes its way through the holes in the walls and I get a huge dose of secondhand. I have tried to plug what holes I can under the sink but it doesn't do much. Oh, and they love to hang out by the front porch when it's warm and I have my front door cracked, so the smoke flows right in again.
In a perfect world nobody would smoke tobacco at all. Heck, it wouldn't even exist. It gives me an instant migraine.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)It's a 20 foot by 20 foot area, and is the only place they are allowed to smoke.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Just don't let them annoy others with it.
I smoke a tiny bit of cannabis, but that smoke has NEVER annoyed me the way tobacco always has. I don't know why. This goes way back to before I ever smoked it.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)You won't hear me praise it. Ever.
Oh, and namecalling is a TOS violation. Do use caution.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)to hoof it in the weather?
Look, your freedom doesn't limit theirs.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)rights take a back seat.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)and essential oil diffusers? Some of that stuff makes me gag, though not the stuff I burn
Bake
(21,977 posts)There. Thanks.
Bake
Dr. Strange
(25,923 posts)Right now!
Bake
(21,977 posts)Sometimes I just crack myself up!!
Bake
Dr. Strange
(25,923 posts)I'm alerting on this.
Bake
(21,977 posts)Were there no pics of Geddy available?
Oh, and alert away! I already alerted on your first post anyway. I'll happily be judged by a jury of my peers!
Bake
Dr. Strange
(25,923 posts)Maybe I'll start a thread on that! I want a Geddy Lee avatar!
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)It will make someone kill someone.
IT'S AN ADDICTION!
Whovian
(2,866 posts)Well, I fired up some tobacco in my apartment and couldn't pay the fine.
What a great idea! We need to find other reasons to put more people behind bars for no real reason at all.
Bigredhunk
(1,351 posts)...was awful. The guy who lived below us was a heavy smoker/heavy cougher. Our apartment smelled because of him. Our clothes smelled because of him. It was disgusting. I tried to talk to the landlord about it. She suggested I get a glade thing for the place.