Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Bean rights" -...
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Bean rights" - by Matt Bors (Original Post) kpete Oct 2012 OP
Perfect! beac Oct 2012 #1
Well, that would be fine except that we all start out female. The fifth panel SHOULD have... HopeHoops Oct 2012 #2
I believe the point is adult female humans capable of reproduction Care Acutely Oct 2012 #3
Well, I got the point, but the geek in me had to offer a rebuttal. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #4
Yeah but that's why it said *woman* shaped. Babies are not shaped like women. Care Acutely Oct 2012 #5
"rebutt your butt" HopeHoops Oct 2012 #6
 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
2. Well, that would be fine except that we all start out female. The fifth panel SHOULD have...
Reply to kpete (Original post)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 11:15 AM
Oct 2012

... read "Unless they become male shaped humans".

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Care Acutely

(1,370 posts)
3. I believe the point is adult female humans capable of reproduction
Reply to HopeHoops (Reply #2)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 12:00 PM
Oct 2012

ETA: That's why it says "woman" shaped, not female shaped.

Then, not so much rights.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post
 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
4. Well, I got the point, but the geek in me had to offer a rebuttal.
Reply to Care Acutely (Reply #3)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 03:02 PM
Oct 2012

And all babies are about the same shape at birth. Our midwife even said "son" with our first daughter, despite the fact that it was CLEARLY not the case. She was tired. With all that blood and stuff, I can see the confusion.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Care Acutely

(1,370 posts)
5. Yeah but that's why it said *woman* shaped. Babies are not shaped like women.
Reply to HopeHoops (Reply #4)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 09:27 PM
Oct 2012

I just think you did a very quick misread, and the geek in me had to rebutt your butt.

Peace out, fellow geek!

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post
Reply to this discussion
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Bean rights" -...
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.