Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:35 PM Jan 2012

Election Law Experts Say James O’Keefe Accomplices Could Face Charges Over Voter Fraud Stunt

"It was one of the few — if not the only — coordinated efforts to attempt in-person voter fraud, and it was pulled off by affiliates of conservative activist James O’Keefe at polling places in New Hampshire Tuesday night. All of it part of an attempt to prove the need for voter ID laws that voting rights experts say have a unfair impact on minority voters.

Now election law experts tell TPM that O’Keefe’s allies could face criminal charges on both the federal and state level for procuring ballots under false names, and that his undercover sting doesn’t demonstrate a need for voter ID laws at all."

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/election_law_experts_say_james_okeefe_accomplices_could_face_charges_over_voter_fraud_stunt.php?ref=fpb






May have already been posted, but I didn't see/find it.

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Election Law Experts Say James O’Keefe Accomplices Could Face Charges Over Voter Fraud Stunt (Original Post) LanternWaste Jan 2012 OP
Good. Richardo Jan 2012 #1
I've said it before and I'll say it again. TheWraith Jan 2012 #2
I was with you until you began attacking OWS protesters Hugabear Jan 2012 #5
agreed, hugabear roguevalley Jan 2012 #21
Got your back there nt hang a left Jan 2012 #41
No doubt! blackspade Jan 2012 #57
I guess this is why I'm not a member of UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2012 #62
massive hijack to slam OWS. Warren Stupidity Jan 2012 #7
First time I've ever heard Rosa Parks described as such... LanternWaste Jan 2012 #8
Well, when you're making stuff up gratuitous Jan 2012 #11
Boringly predictable, AND, chervilant Jan 2012 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2012 #63
Good for you! gratuitous Jan 2012 #66
Was it LAW that blacks sit in the back or just Policy? Bandit Jan 2012 #15
Local (city and county) statutes combined with Jim Crow LanternWaste Jan 2012 #16
You don't know that segregation was a set of laws that separated us racially? Warren Stupidity Jan 2012 #29
Yes, it was written law. That's why MLK was in Birmingham jail. Sometimes breaking the law is needed yardwork Jan 2012 #49
awesome reposte. awesome. roguevalley Jan 2012 #22
Lots of people probably felt that way about her at the time. They're on the wrong side of history. yardwork Jan 2012 #50
false-flag / dirty-tricks / well-poisoning / Rovian tactics are NOT civil disobedience. n/t yodermon Jan 2012 #10
I think you may be getting your terminologies confused blogslut Jan 2012 #13
does that include german jews who fought back in the 1930's? nt msongs Jan 2012 #19
TheWraith bravely ran away Kolesar Jan 2012 #25
I see that Hugabear Jan 2012 #26
Yes, but he has the courage to taunt us in UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2012 #64
Conflating the OWS movement with O'Keefe and his minions is a new low for you, dude. bullwinkle428 Jan 2012 #31
Which OWS people 'whined' about being arrested?? Didn't you know that before each act of sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #32
What was the point of lumping OWS into this? Zalatix Jan 2012 #34
To get everybody arguing about OWS and whether Occupiers are better or worse than Rosa Parks, klook Jan 2012 #60
Your post assumes the orders to leave were legal. jerseyjack Jan 2012 #40
What an asshat comment. Civilization2 Jan 2012 #44
You Win the Anti-Populist Idiot Effort Award fascisthunter Jan 2012 #47
Wow, tying OWS and O'keefe's actions as the same is ridiculous... Spazito Jan 2012 #54
I cut and pasted this so I could save it. UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2012 #65
This piece of shit actually has his own patsies? WTF??? Blue Owl Jan 2012 #3
Even shit has flies. n/t Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #56
RW Activitists breaking the law = "stunts and pranks" FSogol Jan 2012 #4
Former Dem Party official sentenced to jail earlier today - link Bozita Jan 2012 #6
Arrest him and his cohorts Kingofalldems Jan 2012 #9
Organization used to break laws.. denbot Jan 2012 #12
I wouldn't lose all that much sleep if he were declared an enemy combatant and thrown into GITMO. Erose999 Jan 2012 #45
I want Gitmo closed nxylas Jan 2012 #46
I'm just saying that if the house GOP is so intractible about keeping GITMO open they should have Erose999 Jan 2012 #48
Douches. Quantess Jan 2012 #14
K&R Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #17
Jail 'em. n/t Scuba Jan 2012 #18
Will Holder prosecute any of them? Or will this be another free-pass for Republicans? AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #20
Perfect Storm... IthinkThereforeIAM Jan 2012 #59
The first video has a screen grab of them obtaining a ballot for someone who died December 31, 2011 Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #23
Here is a good analogy to show just how stupid this is....... yellowcanine Jan 2012 #24
The repukes have found the TPM comments section Kolesar Jan 2012 #27
Kick this one right back to the top Kingofalldems Jan 2012 #28
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #30
I think the term is misprison of felony? hootinholler Jan 2012 #33
bin Laden The Wizard Jan 2012 #36
There are other terms, but the term misprison of a felony isn't applicable. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #39
Thanks! hootinholler Jan 2012 #53
Me to Mr. O'Keefe 47of74 Jan 2012 #35
from this paper's lips DonCoquixote Jan 2012 #37
Move along ejbr Jan 2012 #42
Frog March that smarmy weasil. jerseyjack Jan 2012 #43
Yeah. lonestarnot Jan 2012 #51
I think there's a big difference between civil disobedience (OWS, e.g.) and voter fraud (O'Keefe). Bake Jan 2012 #52
Let's not wory to much about them zeemike Jan 2012 #55
they lose the right to vote. pansypoo53219 Jan 2012 #58
We get it James. You like to smear people by lying to them & then blaming them for believing you. DirkGently Jan 2012 #61

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
2. I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:37 PM
Jan 2012

Anyone who thinks that "activism" is a license to break laws is an egotistical asshat. Whether they're O'Keefe or the OWS people who whined because they got arrested for trespassing after only being warned twice. No, your "cause" does not mean your shit doesn't stink.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
5. I was with you until you began attacking OWS protesters
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:40 PM
Jan 2012

"OWS people who whined because they got arrested for trespassing after only being warned twice"

Huge difference between violating federal and state election laws and exercising one's right to freedom of speech.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
8. First time I've ever heard Rosa Parks described as such...
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:44 PM
Jan 2012

"Anyone who thinks that "activism" is a license to break laws is an egotistical asshat..."

First time I've ever heard Rosa Parks described as such...

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
11. Well, when you're making stuff up
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:51 PM
Jan 2012

You might as well go all the way. I haven't heard any of the Occupy people complaining about being arrested; the ones I know are perfectly cognizant that they're breaking the law, and they're doing it for a reason. As such, they're willing to accept the consequences.

Now, that sort of commitment makes some people very uncomfortable. Those types like to assume certain positions in an attempt to portray themselves as contrarian or iconoclastic or something, but when push comes to shove, they reliably scurry back to the safest position. But the show isn't complete until they bad-mouth the folks who have the courage of the convictions they wish they had. As boringly predictable as the wetness quality of water.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
38. Boringly predictable, AND,
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:01 AM
Jan 2012

a stellar reason to utilize the ignore option. I think I should add "sanctimonious" to my list of reasons to add someone to my ignore list...

Response to gratuitous (Reply #11)

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
66. Good for you!
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:25 PM
Jan 2012

I've been under close, hostile surveillance by armed state and federal troops in Mexico while visiting Zapatista and displaced communities in Chiapas. And they weren't inclined to just "walk past."

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
15. Was it LAW that blacks sit in the back or just Policy?
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:02 PM
Jan 2012

I don't believe it was actually written LAW.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
16. Local (city and county) statutes combined with Jim Crow
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:07 PM
Jan 2012

Local (city and county) statutes and policy (written, by the way) combined with Jim Crow results in a distinction without a difference.

Irene Morgan in 1946, Sarah Louise Keys in 1955, and Claudette Colvin (on the very same bus system nine months before Parks) were placed in jail for doing precisely the same thing.

yardwork

(61,711 posts)
49. Yes, it was written law. That's why MLK was in Birmingham jail. Sometimes breaking the law is needed
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:48 AM
Jan 2012

Civil disobedience to get people to recognize unfair laws and change them has a long tradition in the U.S. The oppression of African American people in many parts of the U.S. was legal until about fifty years ago. Amazing, isn't it?

blogslut

(38,017 posts)
13. I think you may be getting your terminologies confused
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:58 PM
Jan 2012

Activism does not always equal civil disobedience, which, is most certainly the act of breaking laws in order to bring attention to a cause/message.

bullwinkle428

(20,631 posts)
31. Conflating the OWS movement with O'Keefe and his minions is a new low for you, dude.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 06:32 PM
Jan 2012

OWS-ers "whined" only after they were absolutely brutalized by the police.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
32. Which OWS people 'whined' about being arrested?? Didn't you know that before each act of
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 06:44 PM
Jan 2012

civil disobedience, OWS asks those who are willing to be arrested to let them know so they can be given the legal help they will need. Not one OWS activist has whined about being arrested that I know of. They have been trained on how to handle themselves when arrested, which they expect. They are courageous patriots who are willing to go to jail for what they believe.

What everyone has complained about is the brutality of the police, the near murder of two Iraq War vets who were peacefully protesting, the near killing of others by someone yet to be identified who drove a car into a crowd of protesters among other crimes committed by the Corporate POlice.

What O'Keefe does is sneaky, slimey, and has already been determined to be illegal after his little stunt in the Democratic Senator's office for which he is still on probation. And he skirted the law when he attempted to lure a female reporter into a 'sex trap' but thankfully the reporter was warned by one of his own 'colleagues'.

He did so again recently, his creepy obsession with women has led him twice now to coming right up against the laws on sexual harassment and close to abuse had someone not stopped him.

He is also funded, which OWS are not, by powerful donors and his goal is to destroy democrats.

I fail to see even a remote resemblance to what this piece of scum has done to decent people, and the OWS movement. Not even close.

He is being sued by several people, but one thing is for sure, someone is protecting the weasel and one day he is going to hurt someone as one of his friends already did.

If a democratic activist had done one tiny fraction of what this scum has done, they would be in jail. Which is why it is necessary to find out who he works for. My guess is Rove.

klook

(12,167 posts)
60. To get everybody arguing about OWS and whether Occupiers are better or worse than Rosa Parks,
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 09:18 PM
Jan 2012

or Nazis, or something, apparently -- instead of focusing on the OP, which is about how James O'Keefe's minions not only failed miserably to demonstrate the need for draconian anti-voter fraud measures, but in fact perpetrated voter fraud themselves, and therefore should be thrown UNDER the fucking jail.

 

jerseyjack

(1,361 posts)
40. Your post assumes the orders to leave were legal.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 08:10 AM
Jan 2012

Bloomburg found out his actions were illegal and the park was reopened.

 

Civilization2

(649 posts)
44. What an asshat comment.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 09:23 AM
Jan 2012

Unjust laws are to be willfully broken, (civil rights, etc) that is often the first step in changing them. OWS activists where arrested under BS police state lies and abuse of law-enforcement powers.

These right-wingnuts are not "activists", they are propagandists for degenerate corporatists.

Spazito

(50,481 posts)
54. Wow, tying OWS and O'keefe's actions as the same is ridiculous...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 12:05 PM
Jan 2012

perpetrating voter fraud vs protesting the inequities of the 1%, hmmmm, nope, not the same at all.

O'Keefe wants to keep people from having the right to vote, especially the poor, minorities, etc.

OWS wants fair treatment for everyone instead of for the chosen few.

 

UnrepentantLiberal

(11,700 posts)
65. I cut and pasted this so I could save it.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 04:03 AM
Jan 2012

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

Anyone who thinks that "activism" is a license to break laws is an egotistical asshat. Whether they're O'Keefe or the OWS people who whined because they got arrested for trespassing after only being warned twice. No, your "cause" does not mean your shit doesn't stink.

- TheWraith, Wed Jan 11, 2012

denbot

(9,901 posts)
12. Organization used to break laws..
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:54 PM
Jan 2012

A repug administration would use RICO statutes to go after these asshats.. I would not lose sleep if RICO charges were brought against O'keefe.

Erose999

(5,624 posts)
45. I wouldn't lose all that much sleep if he were declared an enemy combatant and thrown into GITMO.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 09:46 AM
Jan 2012

I mean eavesdropping on a Senator, and now attempted election fraud... are we sure he's not working for Al Qaeda?

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
46. I want Gitmo closed
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:18 AM
Jan 2012

But if he was sent to a regular prison, I wouldn't complain. I'm sure his fellow prisoners will be receptive to his excuse that he was only trying to illustrate the sorts of unscrupulous things that those sneaky black people would get up to if we don't keep an eye on them.

Erose999

(5,624 posts)
48. I'm just saying that if the house GOP is so intractible about keeping GITMO open they should have
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:27 AM
Jan 2012

to sacrifice a few of their own terrorist operatives to do it.
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
20. Will Holder prosecute any of them? Or will this be another free-pass for Republicans?
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:20 PM
Jan 2012

What's with the general immunity for Republicans? What do they have to do to get arrested and prosecuted?

Remember, one of the high-level Republicans even gave a televised interview in which he publicly admitted his role in being a war criminal and approving torture which was described as waterboarding. The result? No prosecution.

Remember the banksters who engaged in massive fraud? And still no prosecutions.

If James O’Keefe is not prosecuted at the federal level, he must be a made man.

IthinkThereforeIAM

(3,077 posts)
59. Perfect Storm...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 03:37 PM
Jan 2012

... that GOP operatives are in the headlines for obtusely violating election laws, state and local, no less! Can you imagine defending any person (hi, beetfart) that got busted in the act while committing election fraud!

Just looking at what this could turn into, if those of us in favor of honesty, can beat WTFox Noise to the punch on this one.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
23. The first video has a screen grab of them obtaining a ballot for someone who died December 31, 2011
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:38 PM
Jan 2012

How exactly is the district supposed to eliminate that registered voter so quickly?

Since the Republicans can't find any actual cases of voter fraud, it is necessary to invent them.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
24. Here is a good analogy to show just how stupid this is.......
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:45 PM
Jan 2012

Election law expert Rick Hasen, who writes the Election Law Blog, joked in an email to TPM that O’Keefe’s team should “next show how easy it is to rob a bank with a plastic gun.”

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
33. I think the term is misprison of felony?
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 08:27 PM
Jan 2012

DU lawyers, is that correct? When the O dude asked his people to break the law, doesn't he become the mastermind? Isn't this a conspiracy?

I hope the US Attorney in NH takes this seriously.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
39. There are other terms, but the term misprison of a felony isn't applicable.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 04:48 AM
Jan 2012

Under the common law of England, misprision of felony was a failure by a person other than an accomplice or co-conspirator to report knowledge of a felony. It was only punishable as a misdemeanor.

Federal law and state laws in some states criminally prohibit a unpriviledged knowing failure to report a felony. Such statues, for example, and not applicable to spouses, priests, and attorneys when there are conditions which have created a privileged relationship. Prosecutions under such statutes are rare. If a prosecutor can obtain a conviction, they usually want to base a conviction upon what a person actually did as opposed to what they did not do.

Under Federal law, 18 USC § 4 provides
"Misprision of felony -- Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

New Hampshire law, NH Rev. Stat. Ann. § 642:5 requires the receipt of a benefit or the anticipated receipt of a benefit for the somewhat related crime of compounding a felony while providing
"Compounding -- A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if he: I. Solicits, accepts, or agrees to accept any benefit as consideration for his refraining from initiating or aiding in a criminal prosecution; ...

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
37. from this paper's lips
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:07 AM
Jan 2012

to Hell's ears. This man has deserved jail for years, ever since he tried bugging Mary Landrieu.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
52. I think there's a big difference between civil disobedience (OWS, e.g.) and voter fraud (O'Keefe).
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:50 AM
Jan 2012

Civil disobedience has a long and honored history. Voter fraud, not so much.

Bake

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
55. Let's not wory to much about them
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 02:02 PM
Jan 2012

Republicans and their operatives never go to prison....they plead guilty to a lesser charge and the judge asks them nicely not to do it again....or next time it will be a sternly worded letter.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
61. We get it James. You like to smear people by lying to them & then blaming them for believing you.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 02:45 AM
Jan 2012

That's such an amazingly powerful propaganda technique that ... NO ONE'S BUYING IT.

Jesus. Kid's not super-bright.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Election Law Experts Say ...