Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PA Democrat

(13,225 posts)
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:08 AM Oct 2012

Granting requests for additional security in Libya would not have prevented the Benghazi attack

that killed Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans. Why? The requests for additional security in Libya were for the Tripoli compound NOT the Benghazi compound where the attack occurred.

WASHINGTON -- In the weeks leading up to the attack last month on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, diplomats on the ground sounded increasingly urgent alarms.

In a stream of diplomatic cables, embassy security officers warned their State Department superiors of a worsening threat from Islamic extremists, and requested that the teams of military personnel and State Department security guards who were already on duty be kept in service.

The requests were denied, but they were largely focused on extending the tours of security guards at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli -- not at the diplomatic compound in Benghazi, 400 miles away.

And State Department officials testified this week during a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing that extending the tour of additional guards -- a 16-member military security team -- through mid-September would not have changed the bloody outcome because it was based in Tripoli, not Benghazi.



Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/news/world/libya-security-flap-debated-657392/#ixzz29BhFnDqS
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Granting requests for additional security in Libya would not have prevented the Benghazi attack (Original Post) PA Democrat Oct 2012 OP
Article also details another Paul Ryan LIE SmileyRose Oct 2012 #1
kick PA Democrat Oct 2012 #2

SmileyRose

(4,854 posts)
1. Article also details another Paul Ryan LIE
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 10:17 AM
Oct 2012

At U.S. diplomatic facilities overseas, the host nation is primarily responsible for providing security outside the compound's walls. Inside the compound, the State Department is in charge, relying on a mix of diplomatic security officers, local contract guards and Marines. The Marines are responsible for guarding classified documents, which they are instructed to destroy if there is a breach of the compound. Senior diplomats are protected by diplomatic security officers, not a detachment of Marines, as Mr. Ryan asserted in Thursday night's debate

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/news/world/libya-security-flap-debated-657392/#ixzz29Bku0r4m

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Granting requests for add...