Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums“Prebuttal” mania is hurting America
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/prebuttal_mania_is_hurting_america/Prebuttal mania is hurting America
Narratives around political events are increasingly pre-set and substance-free
By David Sirota
In the last few weeks, I, like so many other journalists, have received myriad invitations to attend prebuttals that is, events that respond to official events, before the events actually take place. Now a standard practice in all forms of modern campaigning, whether local or national, the prebuttal, whether from candidates or activist groups, almost perfectly summarizes whats so horribly, horribly wrong with American politics.
To highlight that point, consider this mornings predictable invitation from the Obama campaign to listen in to a vice presidential debate prebuttal one that features Democratic Party officials telling reporters that what Republican Paul Ryan will say is wrong even though, of course, Ryan hasnt said anything at the debate yet. Yes, thats right, even though the debate features one half of the Obama ticket, and even though the debate will give that one half of the ticket adequate in-event time to respond to the other side, the campaign still feels the need to preemptively respond, before theres anything to respond to, in hopes that reporters will bake their spin into news coverage.
snip//
And so, again, consider tonights vice presidential debate. For all the hype to the contrary, it hardly matters what the two candidates say. Both sides are already prebuttal-ing each other, effectively guaranteeing that the event will be reprocessed as a competition between prefabricated talking points. Sure, the event itself might be feature genuine moments of debate ie. two people actually talking to each in an actual conversation the maw of the Media-Campaign Complex is already chewing it up and preparing to spit it out as yet another substance-free, Manichean all-or-nothing clash between two competing sports teams (sidenote: this manipulative process is why theres more of a civic imperative than ever to actually watch the full debates and ignore the pre- and post-event spin from the media). We saw this with the medias presidential debate focus on winners and losers rather than on what policy areas the candidates surprisingly agreed on. And we will undoubtedly see it again tonight.
Of course, its certainly true that in many elections, we already know where the candidates stand on issues, thanks to voting records, campaign platforms and past statements. But that doesnt mean political events and especially debates have no value, and should have the substance wrung out of them by the prebuttal impulse. After all, in a country that seems intractably divided along ideological, partisan and demographic lines to the point where different sides seem absolutely unable to converse with one another, debates and the coverage surrounding of them could offer an example of civil, if pointed, discourse the kind of give and take we desperately need if we are going to find consensus on anything.
This is the point forgotten or, more likely, deliberately ignored in our modern election campaigns. For all the potential for transpartisan coalitions and unity to bridge the ideological differences tearing apart America, we will never be able to find any modicum of consensus on anything if we embrace a politics of the prebuttal a politics that says we should never listen to one another, never engage in any kind of discussion, and instead always try to aggressively respond to words that havent yet been spoken.
In this, our political parties and media outlets see an obvious financial upside. In constantly encouraging us to presume bad faith from those with whom we disagree, they generate campaign contributions and ratings, respectively. But in the process, the prebuttal-ization of our politics prevents any possibility of finding common ground. Simply put, responding before theres anything to respond to and then baking those responses into the overall narrative shuts down the prospect of discourse, perpetuating the political war of attrition without regard for trying to solve the moments imminent crises.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 670 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Prebuttal” mania is hurting America (Original Post)
babylonsister
Oct 2012
OP
spanone
(135,855 posts)1. it's absurd. the media is making money hand over fist and presenting capitalism as journalism
Whisp
(24,096 posts)2. Here's hoping Biden gives Ryan a full frontal buttalomy
undeterred
(34,658 posts)3. Will that procedure be covered under Obamacare?
babylonsister
(171,076 posts)4. Hahahaha!!!