General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 5 Most Widely Believed WWII Facts (That Are Bullshit)
This will probably get me pounded from the WWII buffs, but here it is:
http://www.cracked.com/article_18389_the-5-most-widely-believed-wwii-facts-that-are-bullshit.html
The 5 Most Widely Believed WWII Facts (That Are Bullshit)
#5. America Won the War Single-Handedly
Claimed By:
Hollywood, WWII-shooters, Cold War politics and chauvinists.
Sixty years of World War II movies, and a decade of WWII video games, have made one thing clear: If it wasn't for America, you'd all be speaking German right now, baby! U-S-A! U-S-A!
Why it's Bullshit:
Because it's like thinking that while many X-Men contributed in their own special way, defeating Magneto really came down to Iceman.
...
MADem
(135,425 posts)Geoff R. Casavant
(2,381 posts). . . but if you check the article itself, you'll see link after link to other sources that support the arguments. I'm a regular reader of Cracked, and I can tell you the article in the link is not an anomaly; the Cracked writers are funny, but they do their homework.
MADem
(135,425 posts)the term "Allies," thinks that USA won the war single-handed, for example.
It's not horrible, it's just simplistic and cartoonish. You paint with a broad brush, you're not gonna get any decent detail.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)....well, except for number 1 maybe...I still think that FDR had an inkling however small...
fingrinn
(81 posts)That pearl harbor could have been warned if FDR didn't keep the Japanese ambassador waiting for several hours who was about to declare war on America.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I don't see how anyone can have even a sloppy, halfassed education in world history and believe the assertion in Number Five. Anyone who lives in, or has lived anywhere in Europe, in UK, Russia, Australia, NZ, etc., etc., would take immediate issue with the assertion that everyone shares these "opinions."
The article makes five "absolutist" statements with the assumption that "everyone" believes them and then proclaims them bullshit. They just don't connect the dots AFAIAC....
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)Varies a bit but a number of their freelance writers are very good at turning otherwise esoteric/dry information into something entertaining to read.
Really.
PB
MADem
(135,425 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I was hoping to learn something that I didn't already know.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)I for one did learn a thing or two
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)But not an expert by any stretch. I'm lucky to have heard many personal histories first-hand. Those people are dropping off at an alarming rate now.
I certainly never had any delusion that the USA won the war single handedly.
knitter4democracy
(14,350 posts)Stalin took on the entire Eastern Front, for crying out loud, and the Soviets lost millions in the war. We hardly mention them most of the time, and it ticks me off.
As for Pearl Harbor, my dad was there (his dad was stationed there, so the family lived there in Navy housing), and he well remembered his parents talking about expecting an attack by sea from the south. I'm not sure FDR knew, but everyone living in Hawaii knew they were a target at the time according to Dad. They just didn't expect it at that time, on a Sunday, and from the air.
caraher
(6,279 posts)Good luck getting ashore in Europe, for instance, without a little thing known as the Red Army bleeding the Nazis white for years on end. As Cracked pointed out... (though I think they're wrong about the Soviets being inevitable winners of the war - being big is no guarantee against a colossal screwup, it's just gives you a great capacity to recover from your blunders).
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)not any serious person.
denverbill
(11,489 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Even seen a few here, though not in awhile.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Quite the opposite - I have often heard people praise the Soviets, French, British, Dutch, Canadians, and many, many other people for their bravery and contributions to the victory.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Most of that particular type of chestthumping tends to get directed outwards; as I said, I've run into it many times. Plenty, indeed most, people down there recognize that the Allies were, well, a group of allies, but even on DU I've had people flip out at me with the "you'd be speaking German if it wasn't for us!" schtick upon seeing I'm Canadian.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)When it actually stopped the Soviet counterattack outside Moscow as it shut down the Siberian Railroad. Roughly 10 divisions of over 100 infantry divisions had arrived and were pushing the NAZIs back by themselves. If winter does not shut down the railroad, those other 90 divisions would have made mincemeat of the NAZIs.
Winter gave Germany time to retool. Blitzkrieg is an all-or-nothing strategy. Germany had no reserves prepared and would have been hard pressed to stop the advancing Soviets if winter hadn't shutdown so much.
Risen Demon
(199 posts)And I love how they point out the machismo of games like Duke Nukem, and today the Call of Duty franchise. Call of Duty 2, however, was more accurate. You played 3 separate key campaigns: Soviet, British, and USA. Each one puts you in control of one of their military point-men, and each campaign tells about a contribution each allied force made.
After that, it went the direction of American machismo, and unfortunately, these games are being used by recruiters nationwide. Sad, really.
drm604
(16,230 posts)Still, it was an interesting read.
Kindly Refrain
(423 posts)theKed
(1,235 posts)the article...is any of the 5 that Paul Ryan beat Hitler in fisticuffs? Cause that shit's for real.
I mean, look at those pipes.
American Hero, right there.
Get that man a goddamn medal.