Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

still_one

(92,257 posts)
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 12:33 AM Oct 2012

The president will be asked about why there was more security in the embassy. I have no doubt he

will provide an adequate response, but will romney be asked about his constant positions which reverse themselves every hour? I doubt it


10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The president will be asked about why there was more security in the embassy. I have no doubt he (Original Post) still_one Oct 2012 OP
I hope that he knocks it out of the park because this Libya thing is really bad. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #1
Before the next Presidential debate DURHAM D Oct 2012 #2
one would hope so still_one Oct 2012 #4
"So, Governor Romney, where do you stand on abortion today?" sadbear Oct 2012 #3
and almost every other issue also still_one Oct 2012 #6
More security at the embassy than the consulate? dkf Oct 2012 #5
It would not have made any difference. DollarBillHines Oct 2012 #7
Because a GOP House, goaded by Darrell Issa, voted AGAINST PROPERLY FUNDING IT. MADem Oct 2012 #8
That can't be repeated enough. LiberalAndProud Oct 2012 #9
Talk about fucked up priorities! That's sleazeball Issa for ya, though. nt MADem Oct 2012 #10

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
2. Before the next Presidential debate
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 12:35 AM
Oct 2012

our SOS will likely do some media to explain what happened. That should tamp down the interest.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
5. More security at the embassy than the consulate?
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 12:36 AM
Oct 2012

Or why there wasn't more security at the consulate?

DollarBillHines

(1,922 posts)
7. It would not have made any difference.
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 12:48 AM
Oct 2012

The outpost would have been over-run.

This wasn't some some Rambo-like wet dream.

Two or three additional guards would have only have been two or three more casualties.

Get real, 'pubs.
DBH

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. Because a GOP House, goaded by Darrell Issa, voted AGAINST PROPERLY FUNDING IT.
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 01:35 AM
Oct 2012

Simple questions have simple answers! Boom goes the dynamite, right here:

http://www.govexec.com/defense/2012/10/democrats-accuse-issa-extremely-partisan-libya-investigation/58669/?oref=river

A memo from Democratic staff to committee members obtained by the Alley blasts Issa for a litany of perceived improprieties, including: Failing to consult with Democratic members before issuing public letters with unverified allegations, concealing witnesses from Democratic staff, withholding documents obtained by the committee during the investigation, and effectively excluding Democratic committee members from joining a "poorly planned" congressional delegation to Libya.

The memo also illustrates how House Republicans voted to reduce security funding by roughly a half-billion dollars below the Obama administration's request, since gaining the majority of the chamber in 2011. "Commentators have noted the inconsistency of those who criticize embassy security after voting to cut funding for it," the memo states.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
9. That can't be repeated enough.
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 02:35 AM
Oct 2012

Security in the embassies was curtailed by Republicans in Congress who failed to provide proper funding, and they should be held accountable.

Thanks, MADem.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The president will be ask...